| Posted: 08 July 2012 at 9:19am | IP Logged | 7
|
|
|
Bill Everett created The Sub-Mariner for Motion Picture Funnies Weekly. So someone correct me if i'm remembering wrong but his first appearance in Marvel comics #1 is a reprint. Now I think had he wanted to make an case out of it Everett could have but he didn't. I would argue that he is one of the men who was a corner stone of what built Marvel. A lot of how it worked in the "Golden Age" had to do with the Absolute Power wielded by the Publishers. If you wanted to work in comics -- or, perhaps more correctly, if you wanted to make a living wage working in comics, there were very few options. Will Eisner objected to the situation as it existed, and walked away. He found his own avenues and followed (and even built) them. Jack Kirby played the game -- to the extent that he operated by the same rules when he became a publisher himself It is also important to remember that comics, despite the presence of some truly spectacular talent, were very much the bottom of the barrel. This was where people ended up who were unable to make it into the strips. It would be a long time before comics became somewhere that could be considered a first choice. (Remember, that even top talent like Neal Adams, Joe Kubert, Gil Kane, etc, still worked in the strips when they could.) So much has changed in such a relatively short time, it's difficult for some to remember what conditions were like BEFORE the changes. Wolfman's lawsuit against Marvel seemed largely predicated on this, in fact. He seemed genuinely surprised when people turned up in court to say "No, that's not how it was." People like Jim Shooter, Tom Palmer, Gene Colan.* * Historic accuracy: Palmer and Colan did not testify in court. They gave depositions that became part of the record.
|