Fists, Guns, and Goggles (All Golden Age/ Pulp Hero News Thread)
Printed From: The John Byrne Forum
Forum Name: The John Byrne Forum
Forum Discription: Everything to do with comic book writer/artist John Byrne
URL: https://www.byrnerobotics.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=19733
Printed Date: 10 June 2026 at 12:48pm
Topic: Fists, Guns, and Goggles (All Golden Age/ Pulp Hero News Thread)
Posted By: Chad Carter
Subject: Fists, Guns, and Goggles (All Golden Age/ Pulp Hero News Thread)
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 6:44pm
|
Whenever Golden Age heroes are used, I get intrigued. Maybe just me and Roy Thomas, and JB has an affinity obviously.
According to Newsrama http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=121397 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=121397 , the new series by Alex Ross (art) is SUPERPOWERS.

For some reason (assuming as I am that these character portraits are by Ross), these particular figures don't feel so "real" to me, as with most of Ross' recent work. As in, men in costumes instead of superheroes in costumes.
Maybe it's just the nature of the characters. By the way, some of these I've never heard about at all. Any info? See more at the link.



|
Replies:
Posted By: David Barker
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 7:01pm
|
I think most of those are from Nedor/Standard publishing. The original America's Best and Exciting Comics. I think "The Devil" Is the original Daredevil. which is lev gleason comics.
|
Posted By: Thomas Moudry
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 7:01pm
Devil is, of course, the original Daredevil from Lev Gleason; I guess they
can't use the original name for obvious reasons. The Black Terror looks
pretty cool, but I don't recognize the Crusaders.
-------------
|
Posted By: David Barker
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 7:03pm
|
There was a Crusader in the Black Terror comic...I'm guessing it is related.
|
Posted By: Thomas Moudry
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 7:04pm
The Green Lama is on the roster, too.
-------------
|
Posted By: David Barker
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 7:07pm
|
That will make many people happy. I'm not familiar myself, but doesn't he have a cult following ( Mac Raboy art maybe)?
|
Posted By: Ray Brady
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 7:08pm
I think the guys in the lower left and right corners are the Flame and the
Arrow, respectively.
|
Posted By: Joe Zhang
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 7:12pm
Posted By: Thomas Moudry
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 7:16pm
I recognized the Flame from Richard O'Brien's The Golden Age of Comic
Books, an art book of Golden Age comic book covers I bought when I was a
kid.
This looks really good.
-------------
|
Posted By: Nathan Greno
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 7:16pm
Neat to see the return of the original Daredevil!

|
Posted By: Nathan Greno
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 7:18pm
Posted By: Eric Smearman
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 7:25pm
|
IIRC, versions of many of these characters were used in Alan Moore's ABC books. First in Tom Strong and later in two mini-series called Terra Obscura.
|
Posted By: Daniel Kendrick
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 7:31pm
|
Black Terror was, so was the Green Lama. I'd have to pull out the issues to check and see who else was.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 8:44pm
Characters in the promo art by original names: The Claw, Green Lama, the Face, the Owl (in revised costume), Black Terror, the Flame, Daredevil, the Moth (? some speculation says Blue Beetle but that would be begging for lawsuit), Pyroman, Miss Masque, the Arrow, and Samson.
According to the story, the Crusaders are legacies of the American Crusader, a Nedor character.
The Green Lama wasn't part of TOM STRONG or TERRA OBSCURA, he was never
published by Nedor/Standard/Better. You're probably thinking of the
Green Ghost.
I'm torn as some of the comments make it sound like it's going to be less what made JUSTICE fun but more like the typical stuff we've been seeing out of the companies these days. Modern "realistic" takes on the characters, more about the conflicts between the heroes, some dying and others going bad instead of just a grand adventure
-------------
|
Posted By: James Hanson
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 9:15pm
Hey, an Alex Ross project I might actually buy.
-------------
|
Posted By: Kor Watkins
Date Posted: 18 July 2007 at 9:53pm
Makes me wonder if he's been reading FemForce and other AC Comics, where these characters have been in use for over a decade! Check them out! AC does a great job of telling good, fun stories!
------------- www.korokstudios.com
http://korokaceo.blogspot.com
|
Posted By: John Peter Britton
Date Posted: 19 July 2007 at 8:38am
|
How come he never hurts himself with that belt of his?
|
Posted By: Jeff Ross
Date Posted: 19 July 2007 at 9:07am
|
This looks great. What's the streetdate for this?
|
Posted By: Bert Roberson
Date Posted: 19 July 2007 at 9:16am
|
How come they can use the exact character design but not the name?
|
Posted By: Bruce Buchanan
Date Posted: 19 July 2007 at 9:24am
|
Not sure how good the stories will be, but I love the idea of resurrecting these long-forgotten Golden Age heroes. Heck, I'm glad to see an independent publisher doing superhero stories and I hope it starts a trend.
There's a lot of potential here. Whether it will pay off is the big question.
|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 19 July 2007 at 9:25am
|
Bert, do you mean on the Daredevil design? Presumably because they would get sued by Marvel for publishing a superhero called Daredevil, just as DC has to call a comic featuring Captain Marvel "Shazam."
Anyway, the art looks great. They look like comic book characters, unlike some of Ross's other recent art.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 19 July 2007 at 9:37am
Trademarks only apply to the covers and promotional material though.
It's why DC can still call Captain Marvel by name inside the book. So, it is
a bit confusing as to why they'd change the names. Whereas posting a pic
promoting the series with a clear rendition of MLJ's Shield is surely both a
trademark and copyright violation.
-------------
|
Posted By: Bruce Buchanan
Date Posted: 19 July 2007 at 9:39am
|
Anyway, the art looks great. They look like comic book characters
*************
I was thinking the same thing. Looking at these character sketches makes me want to read about these characters.
I think I'm going to have to give this book a shot.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 19 July 2007 at 9:44am
|
I think the name issue is just CYA; the characters are in the public domain, and I recall just recently asking about the Quality Comics characters, and Freedom Fighters, and whether they're in the public domain. It was indicated you could tell stories about them, but in order to stay clear of some potential legal entanglement, it's better to change the name or not use the name at all? Maybe I misunderstood.
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 19 July 2007 at 7:17pm
In the case of the Quality Comics and Fawcett characters, I think the
original stories are now in public domain, but the characters
themselves are currently the property of DC comics. This is why AC
Comics, for example, can put out black and white reprints of Bulletman,
or whoever, without fear of reprisal.
All the characters in this new series are supposedly in public domain,
so anyone can use them. Theoretically, DC can put out another Terra
Obscura miniseries at the same time as Superpowers, and use the exact
same characters from the Nedor/Standard stable, so long as they don't
duplicate the concepts or character events therein. So you can have a
zombie Black Terror in one series and the human version in another.
They can both spring from the original creation, but they go in
different creative directions. Very interesting.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 19 July 2007 at 7:31pm
|
I'm hoping it's not another WATCHMEN situation. At the same time I loved GOLDEN AGE which pretty much did a WATCHMEN thing, even more visceral considering it was "Elseworlds" and heroes in long-standing deteriorated mentally and died horribly. The important thing to note, for me, was that James Robinson gave everyone a chance. At one point or another, every character had a choice; once made, they were locked into their respective fates.
Considering the absolute atrocity of DC's treatment of the JSA up until GOLDEN AGE, it was probably the best send-off the JSA "never had". If this SUPERPOWERS work wishes to go that route, I won't begrudge it necessarily. As long as the characters are given a chance to logically follow their fates, I can enjoy the treatment. If the characters are completely changed and twisted to suit some WATCHMENesque story, then that'll be a shame on Ross and Kruger. These old forgotten character deserve a shot at some popularity, not blatant infamy from bad story-telling.
|
Posted By: James Hanson
Date Posted: 19 July 2007 at 7:35pm
And just to note to Black Terror fans-- Alan Moore used him in the Tom
Strong book. He's featured prominently in Vol. 2 of the TPB collections.
-------------
|
Posted By: Kor Watkins
Date Posted: 20 July 2007 at 7:52am
Black Terror has been used quite a bit in FemForce, tho I think they eventually altered his name. AC Comics also produced a Mego-esque Black Terror action figure! They have done an amazing job of reviving forgotten golden age heroes and heroines, and have been doing so for a long, long time. They also have a great line of GA reprints, again with material that would otherwise be forgotten. (Okay, some of it should be forgotten, but still...it's great to see.)
------------- www.korokstudios.com
http://korokaceo.blogspot.com
|
Posted By: David Ferguson
Date Posted: 20 July 2007 at 8:13am
I loved GOLDEN AGE. If this is anything like that, I'll have to pick it up.
Not trying to upset people but JMS is doing a Golden Age Project.
http://www.newsarama.com/NewJoeFridays/greenfridays.html - Newsarama
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 20 July 2007 at 8:35am
I gave up on AC's Fem Force a while back though I do regularly get their
bw reprints. But, even with the reprints, there are shenanigans such as
replacing Captain Marvel Jr with Mr. Scarlet in the Crime Crusaders Club
story or another golden-age story that had the hero substituted with their
version of the Fighting Yank in a Fighting American inspired costume.
When reading reprints of golden-age stories I expect a little more fidelity
to the source material. When they do things like that, it makes it hard to
trust the stories when other oddities appear such as a recent Captain
Midnight where the character was promoted and referred to as "Major
Midnight". Did that really happen or is it another of Black's changes?
I like GOLDEN AGE fine as an Elseworlds. The Tarantula as an alcoholic
and abuser? Robotman as a murdering psychopath (when the reality of his
stories at this point in time had become more light hearted)? Johnny
Thunder as unlikeable? And the one scene of the GA Hawkman as being
barbaric in battle and Hourman as an action addict have become
predominant traits of their mainstream versions, to their detriment I feel.
The art by Paul Smith looked spot on though.
There's also in the works a project at Marvel with the Timely heroes by
JMS and Chris Weston, art can be found searching his blog
http://chrisweston.blogspot.com/2006/10/spill-beans.htm l - http://chrisweston.blogspot.com/2006/10/spill-beans.html
From what has been released about it, a bunch of Timely heroes find
themselves in the MU today, Some adjust, some don't. Personally, I don't
care much for Weston's art as he relies too much on models, making his
figures too stiff and posed in addition to focusing too much on the
mundane of the human figure when superheroes should look more
Romanticised unless your point is deconstructing the genre. Again.
Why can't someone just give us good superhero stories with the classic
guys?]
-------------
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 20 July 2007 at 8:36am
Beat me to the punch David.
-------------
|
Posted By: Eric Lund
Date Posted: 20 July 2007 at 8:57am
|
I would love to see Alex Ross do the Archie Heroes... The Shield, The Web, The Fox, Jaguar, The Fly, The Hangman... that would be awesome!
|
Posted By: Juan Jose Colin Arciniega
Date Posted: 20 July 2007 at 9:20am
This is the first time that i see those characters...with the exception of the "Terror" (is it the same terror that appeared on ABComics by Moore?)
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 20 July 2007 at 9:38am
|
but JMS is doing a Golden Age Project.
I'm missing it in the article, unless they're talking about AGENTS OF ATLAS 2 or whatever it is. I hate JMS/Bendis/Q having anything to do with any comic book character, much less the GA characters.
|
Posted By: David Ferguson
Date Posted: 20 July 2007 at 9:56am
|
It's just a quick line and two pics. I don't recognise the character but I think he was in The Golden Age storyline in Daredevil.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 20 July 2007 at 10:01am
Yeah, Juan. Or rather, it's based on the same character that Moore based
his on. The characters of Terra Obscura from the two mini's and that
guest-starred in Moore's TOM STRONG were all based on the comic book
golden-age characters from the publisher known as Better, Standard,
Thrilling, and Nedor at various points. The comics often boasted some
great covers by Alex Schomburg, probably a big reason why there are
fans today, from looking through Overstreet. The insides usually were a
bit sub-par when compared to DC, Quality, and Fawcett except for a brief
time when Mort Meskin and Jerry Robbins worked on the Black Terror and
the Fighting Yank and some of the Jungle Girl titles. You can find some
golden-age Fighting Yank stories as well as Princess Pantha by that
company at my website:
http://www.geocities.com/cash_gorman/comics/comics.index
Some of the "major" characters from the company: Captain Future (both a
pulp and comic superhero version), Doc Strange, Miss Masque, Fighting
Yank, Pyroman, American Crusader, American Eagle, Wonderman, Black
Terror, Grim Reaper
-------------
|
Posted By: David Ferguson
Date Posted: 20 July 2007 at 10:01am
|
I think he was called "The Defender" so JMS might be messing with a Bendis character and not a real GA character.
|
Posted By: Juan Jose Colin Arciniega
Date Posted: 20 July 2007 at 10:03am
Thanks Ed for the info!
-------------
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 20 July 2007 at 10:13am
The Defender was a real GA Timely character.

-------------
|
Posted By: David Ferguson
Date Posted: 20 July 2007 at 10:23am
My GA knowledge is limited at best. Dunno for sure if it's that character that JMS is on though.
Thanks for the info Ed.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 25 July 2007 at 4:15pm
|
I wanted to post the latest images from SUPERPOWERS from a newsrama link, http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=122270 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=122270
I love the little bitches already complaining about how the same kind of series could be done with more well-know characters. I hate the slavering love for popular characters, or "hot" characters, as if that's all that superhero comics consists of and no project should be undertaken unless Batman and Wolverine is prominently involved.
LOVE the Face. Actually, they're ALL really nice looking.



|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 25 July 2007 at 4:16pm
Posted By: Mike Norris
Date Posted: 25 July 2007 at 4:23pm
Anyone getting an "It's a man baby!" vibe from Masquerade?
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 25 July 2007 at 4:31pm
Posted By: Mark Matthewman
Date Posted: 25 July 2007 at 9:47pm
|
I am buyuing this.
Say what you will, but I have always loved ross's work.
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 26 July 2007 at 12:41am
Anyone getting an "It's a man baby!" vibe from Masquerade?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Only if they combined Miss Masque with Madam Fatal, who was a guy dressed as an old woman.
Myself, I think the design is pretty good, except for the hat.
As said before, AC Comics has used a lot of the old characters. I'm aware that they used Miss Masque in Femforce and printed some new Daredevil stories with the characted renamed Red Devil.
-------------
|
Posted By: Eric Smearman
Date Posted: 26 July 2007 at 2:32am
|
Looks pretty good. I'm definitely giving this a shot.
|
Posted By: Kevin Hagerman
Date Posted: 26 July 2007 at 2:44am
|
One thing's for sure - I don't see any fear of colorful garb with this project. Excelsior!
|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 26 July 2007 at 4:41am
|
These images feel a bit like his work on MARVELS.
|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 26 July 2007 at 7:52am
|
These images feel a bit like his work on MARVELS.
***
Good. MARVELS was fine. Some of his later work looks realistic to the point where they no longer look like superheroes.
|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 26 July 2007 at 9:17am
Some of his later work looks realistic to the point where they no longer look like superheroes.
---
Agreed. I prefer it when he doesn't draw every little fold, crease and flap. He's a talented guy.
|
Posted By: Ronald Pegram
Date Posted: 26 July 2007 at 9:34am
I've come to a conclusion about Ross' work and I'm interested in what you all think.
I think many comic readers of today need 'detail' in their art, whether
the detail is superfluous or not. When I think of an artist like Curt
Swan, there was a certain economy of line in his work that makes it
timeless but I don't think it would be popular today.
The approach many have taken to add this desired 'detail' is to grossly
overemphasize the anatomy of the characters. I've seen illustrations in
which the muscles in the neck of a character are visible through a
mask! Most fit people don't look ripped in clothes unless they have a
big chest and/or shoulders. I know certain boxers who look like
monsters in their trunks but look 'small' in clothing.
It seems Ross makes up for this desired detail by adding texture,
folds, creases and other things we don't like. Since I've had this
epiphany, I'm actually appreciating his work more. Take a look at 'The
Owl' for instance. That character isn't heavily muscled at all. Now
pose him next to most popular depictions of Bat-Man, abdominal muscles
showing through the shirt and all, and tell me what you like. For me,
The Owl is what Bat-Man is supposed to be.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 26 July 2007 at 11:13am
Of course the Owl looked like this in earlier incarnations:

-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 02 August 2007 at 3:25pm
|
There's coverage of who is involved in the (gag!) JMS/Chris Weston THE TWELVE series by newsrama, so instead of starting a new thread we can consider THE TWELVE to be the Anti-SUPERPOWERS. Still, I'm all for great Golden Age character treated well...won't happen by JMS, but maybe again I can be wrong and admit it and enjoy a nice series with characters who may be...slightly what they were meant to be in the 1940s.
First ones, http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=123542 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=123542 and http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=123693 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=123693 , THE WITNESS and THE BLACK WIDOW...


|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 02 August 2007 at 3:43pm
|
Actually more intriguing is another project involving Golden Age heroes/characters, but with Erik Larsen behind it. Hadn't heard about it at all, but am ready to check it out. Releasing in December from Image...
http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=11230 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=11230
Two by Eric Larsen, and then a particularly sweet cover with The Clock and Captain Triumph by Mike Allred.



|
Posted By: Andy Mokler
Date Posted: 02 August 2007 at 3:49pm
|
Does anyone have a scan of the Scarab as he originally looked? He seems out of place compared to how Ross is doing the rest of the characters. He's very over-muscled and doesn't look as fluid and natural as the other drawings. I am looking forward to the project though.
|
Posted By: Darrin Wiltshire
Date Posted: 02 August 2007 at 4:21pm
|
Here you go Andy!

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 02 August 2007 at 4:26pm
|
I'm thinking this Scarab is different, though the one above is from the Golden Age, Nedor Comics.
I've been trying to find the SUPERPOWERS' particular Scarab. Is he the Silver Scarab?
|
Posted By: Darrin Wiltshire
Date Posted: 02 August 2007 at 4:39pm
|
He is the only Scarab from the golden age. I know for a fact that there would be no character from the golden age who would look anything like Ross's Scarab.
Darrin
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 02 August 2007 at 5:24pm
I figured that the Alex Ross Scarab design, being similar to the
Kingdom Come Blue Beetle design, was Ross's version of the Golden Age
Blue Beetle.
Since the character has been published by a variety of comic book
companies, and the chainmail/Dan Garret version has actually popped up
in some DC Comics (Secret Origins, Blue Beetle, JLA Year One) maybe he
felt a redesign was in order so as not to make waves?
This would probably be a case similar to the reason for not calling the original Daredevil by name.
|
Posted By: Darrin Wiltshire
Date Posted: 02 August 2007 at 5:38pm
|
I honestly don't know why Ross went in this direction, he seems out of place with the other heroes like Andy mentioned. Still, I can't wait to see this when it comes out along with the other retro comics.
Darrin
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 02 August 2007 at 6:41pm
|
No character who looks like Scarab in the Golden Age...
I hadn't thought of it that way, but you're right, Darrin. For the most part. I mean, this Ross Scarab might exist in a much less...articulated fashion?
I mean, all the other characters in SUPERPOWERS are pretty much extant according to their original conception, near as I can tell.
|
Posted By: Darrin Wiltshire
Date Posted: 02 August 2007 at 7:13pm
|
On a side note, Richard Boucher and myself will be starting a new golden age website in the very near future. Basically a who's who of the golden age, which to date is around 1100 characters. Details are tentative right now, but an issue of our old website is still up on the net somewhere - The Good Guys & Gals of the Golden Age. If all things go according to plan, we should be up and running by end of the year.
Best,
Darrin
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 04 August 2007 at 10:03am
|
Continuing THE TWELVE coverage http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=123751 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=123751

BLUE BLADE...you'll note the artist mentioning "Could be the break-out character of the series...if he survives!"
I wish superhero comic books weren't so anal expulsive about death...adventure and dynamism and grandeur ought to be paramount, and death should mean sacrifice, the ultimate sacrifice, particular in superhero fiction.
Now death means merely "climax". Whatever happened to the mystery of maybe, I don't know, having a character merely vanish...or have some kind of cliffhanger where you don't know if the character is alive or dead? Wouldn't that give readers a chance to, like, make a decision if they'd enjoy seeing the Blue Blade again for instance? Wasn't that the way it used to be done?
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 04 August 2007 at 12:48pm
The fact so many people confuse or are associating the Scarab with the Blue Beetle design Ross did for DC would be enough grounds for DC to pursue via trademark violation. That's the very thing that trademarks protect against. Especially when they use it with promotional artwork.
I've also done some profiles of the various characters from the SUPERPOWERS and the Image project at http://www.comicboards.com/gsmb/
Not a fan of Weston's art. Relies too heavily on models to the point that it robs the artwork of all sense of life or movement, but all seems deliberately posed. Compare it to the samples on the Buscema thread where each panel was about storytelling and emotion. Weston's is very detailed and realistic, but the emotion is flat and tends to focus on the mundane, how silly and ugly the human form can be instead of its beauty.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 04 August 2007 at 2:10pm
|
I'd agree about Weston. Something seems slightly off. I wouldn't bother posting the images as they seem markedly lacking in dynamism compared to the Ross stuff, but these Golden Age projects are all kind of running in conjunction, and I'm also hoping that one of them, either Ross', Larsen's, and (no chance) JMS' elevates some of these wonderful concepts from a time, as Larsen mentions, when none of the Golden Age creators had a model to work against, there were NO costumed characters previous, no superheroes especially, so the innovation of their work is particularly special.
|
Posted By: Emery Calame
Date Posted: 05 August 2007 at 12:44am
For some reason I really enjoyed "the Fin".
-------------
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 05 August 2007 at 1:02am
I think that the Golden Age Blue Beetle is in public domain, but his
Charlton incarnation (prior to Ted Kord) is not. DC's claim to
ownership of the character is probably based on the Charlton material
as it pertains to Kord's story. Hence, their claim to ownership might
be murky, at best. I think the Superpowers Scarab design is a subtle
enough "nod" to the Blue Beetle so that longtime readers know the
reference without actually having to spell it out. Plus, why would DC
want to piss off Ross, one of their premiere talents by siccing the
legal hounds on him? Especially when the similarity is to a character
design that he, himself created for them?
Superficially, his two designs bear some resemblance, especially with
the Scarab emblem, the blue coloration, goggle-lenses and wings, but
the Kingdom Come version is more of a traditional knight's armor,
whereas this version is far sleeker. I'm willing to bet that Ross is
canny enough to reference the source without stepping on any toes.
|
Posted By: Robert Bradley
Date Posted: 05 August 2007 at 1:06am
|
I was really impressed with Weston's Fantastic Four: First Family. And Ross is an amazing talent, but sometimes his storytelling isn't up too the level of his artistic technique.
And that Blue Blade illustration is just something else. What, I'm not sure.....
-------------
|
Posted By: Ted Pugliese
Date Posted: 05 August 2007 at 6:52am
|
I was at the King Tut exhibit in Philly, Friday, and got to see the "real" Blue Beetle Scarab from his tomb.
Kaji Da!
-------------
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 05 August 2007 at 6:59am
It's not a matter of pissing Ross off. Trademark law is you defend it or you lose it. Plain and simple. DC owns the Kord version. It doesn't matter if the golden-age Blue Beetle is public domain because it doesn't look anything like him and it's not supposed to be him. What the Scarab re-design does look like is the redesign Ross did for DC's
Blue Beetle. That version of the character is a trademark and copyright
for DC. When this artwork was first released, every board I went to
assumed it was the Blue Beetle first and foremost. And that's the very thing that trademarks are supposed to protect against. One of the reasons I don't care for the design is that it plays up the "name" of the hero but there aren't any elements of his original design. And that's part of the reason why it leads to confusion.
As far as Weston, all the promo art for this project I've seen on his site seems along the lines of the Blue Blade. There's one piece he did that really illustrates what I find wrong with his art, where he recreates his version of a 1970's Captain America cover originally done by Sal Buscema. Sure, Weston's color has the more fine line detail and subtler colors and realism. But it has all the dynamism and drama of a row of cars on car lot. Whereas Buscema's cover is full of excitement and movement, a split second of action in full steam. And clearly could not have been done using models.
-------------
|
Posted By: Robert Bradley
Date Posted: 05 August 2007 at 10:03am
|
I like Weston reimagining of Captain America #131, but I can certainly agree with your point that it doesn't have the same energy as the original one.
I think we can attribute this to a shift in tastes in comic art though - more towards the Alex Ross/John Cassaday/Gary Frank/Bryan Hitch/Chris Weston 'realism' over the Jack Kirby/Steve Ditko/Gil Kane/John Romita/John Buscema 1960s 'energetic storytelling'.
Personally, I prefer the general style of the 60s, but with decompressed storytelling like it is, the 'realism' is one of the few things that can make a comic of talking heads somewhat attractive.


-------------
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 05 August 2007 at 4:34pm
|
Darrin, would you be willing to email scans of the entire Scarab story from where you got that splash?
I'd love to read the whole thing, as I haven't found any Scarab stories on the web before.
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: Thom Price
Date Posted: 05 August 2007 at 4:55pm
Captain American's costume is hideous when drawn that literally.
Edit: I don't even understand how the costume works in that first picture. The chain mail is on top of the tunic? What's the white star, a cutout? Pasted on top of the chainmail?
|
Posted By: Charles Jones
Date Posted: 05 August 2007 at 5:07pm
Captain American's costume is hideous when drawn that literally. *** I agree it looks like feathers or something, that drawing is over-rendered.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 05 August 2007 at 5:41pm
|
Maybe Cap absorbed the Falcon, like some twins do en utero when the "stronger" of the two basically eats the other, and the feathers are Cap's version of a "third arm" or some kind of tumorous outgrowth of this melding. Eh?
|
Posted By: Robert Bradley
Date Posted: 05 August 2007 at 5:46pm
|
We can blame Kevin Maguire or John Cassaday for the 'feathers'
Maguire is the one who first drew all the detail of the chainmail, Cassady made it popular. Other artists since have made them look like feathers.



-------------
|
Posted By: Michael Thompson
Date Posted: 05 August 2007 at 7:57pm
Well he does have the bird wings, and Bachalo drew him with a beak. So why not feathers? The transformation is now complete. (Just kidding.)
-------------
|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 05 August 2007 at 9:10pm
|
I do not like the "feathers" on Cap. A hint of the texture is all that is needed to get the point across.
|
Posted By: Brian Hague
Date Posted: 05 August 2007 at 9:18pm
|
Friends who are involved in various mideval recreation events have told me that the modern Cap is wearing "scale mail" rather than chain mail. Apparently, scale mail provides somewhat better protection, and the indications of texture on his costume over the years have hinted that he's always worn scale rather than chain mail, regardless of how the text may read.
Nevertheless, the new stuff doesn't look good to them either, and we've discussed how much noisier he appears nowadays. Maguire did a very nice job on the art of that mini-series, but I've read an interview with Adam Hughes where he says that he was up for that as well, and felt in some respects that he'd lost out on the project of a lifetime not getting it. A WWII Cap project by Hughes would be something to see...
|
Posted By: Peter Svensson
Date Posted: 05 August 2007 at 9:57pm
|
As someone on this board said, Captain America's outfit makes more sense if you imagine it as cloth worn OVER mail.
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 06 August 2007 at 2:16pm
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 06 August 2007 at 2:19pm
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 06 August 2007 at 2:20pm
The conclusion:


|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 06 August 2007 at 3:21pm
I love how the guy chosen to impersonate the Scarab in this tale has no
powers, a big pointy mustache and talks with a French accent. Art and
story is fairly indicative of comics from Standard/Better/Nedor in the early
40's.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 06 August 2007 at 6:42pm
|
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=123753 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=123753
Continuing the covering of the TWELVE, using Golden Age heroes owned by Marvel:

No joke, I dig the hairy legs.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 07 August 2007 at 7:23am
To me, that's a prime example of what I don't like about Weston's work
on superheroes, where his sensibilities don't match up with the genre.
He's taking an aspect of the costume that he finds silly and then
accentuates that to an extreme point making it seem even more ludicrous
in the context of being more realistic. He's actually mocking the character
and concept, holding it up for ridicule. One can only imagine if he was
drawing the teen-age Robin, we'd see hairy arms and legs, pubes and
under-arm hair peaking out from under the costume and the weak
shadow of a teen-ager's mustache. Or Wonder Woman and Paradise
Island, they are warrior women, highly unlikely to shave their legs and
under-arms or pluck eyebrows or have tooth-brushes. If he truly can't
wrap his mind around a man running around in a super hero costume
fighting crime but has bare legs or is bare chested, then do a subtle re-
design of the costume so it does work or maybe realize that
straightforward superhero fiction isn't the right genre to be working in.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 07 August 2007 at 7:57am
|
That's true, Ed. I like the hairy legs only because I'm kind of a hairy dude and in a world of hairless Ken doll chests and limbs as depicted in our current culture, I welcome the hair. Not the pubes though, that I can do without.
The argument about hair kind of reminds me of some of those "Ren and Stimpy" shorts from years ago, where they'd show a superhero with hair coming out of his ears or other inappropriate places.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 07 August 2007 at 8:44am
True. I always liked Puck being a hairy little fellow. And bald with a beard.
But, there it's part of the character's original design and concept. Always
wanted to see more mustached and bearded heroes.
As long as they are men.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 07 August 2007 at 8:56am
Ron, you're the man! I really appreciate the scans.
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 07 August 2007 at 9:11am
|
Ed, Chris Weston's artwork was incredible on Enemy Ace: War in Heaven over at DC a few years back, and I was surprised to see him doing superhero fare at Marvel recently.
Some of his designs for this project, such as those for the Witness, Blue Blade and Dynamic Man, work really well for me. They're about the only thing shown of "The Twelve" project that has me somewhat hopeful for the series. I love Babylon 5, but JMS has been a cluster -.... of a comic book writer, with little regard for the established characters that he's worked on.
When I saw Weston's Capt. Wonder yesterday, I was a bit put off by the hairy legs thing myself, and pretty much took it the same way that you did. I really have to "wonder" if this character isn't earmarked for a coffin during this series as he doesn't seem to have received as much love as some of the other returning golden agers that we've seen so far.
I do remain curious about who else is set to return in the Twelve. Looks like Elektro has the nod from Newsarama for tomorrow's debut and based on comments in the promo pieces, we can possibly expect to see Fiery Mask, Laughing Mask and Master Mind Excello at some point.
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 07 August 2007 at 9:30am
The only one that looks halfway good to me so far is Dynamic Man, the
art released today. In his efforts to make the characters realistic looking,
the Witness and Captain Wonder look ugly and brutish while the Black
Widow and the Blue Blade look like they belong on the street turning
tricks for their next fix. Black Widow doesn't look fem fatale or sexy to me
as much as she does harsh and hard. It's just something about his
artwork, it brings out more of the ugliness, mundane and earthy nature of
the human figure instead of its beauty.
-------------
|
Posted By: Joe Zhang
Date Posted: 07 August 2007 at 9:40am
|
Meh. Looks like another Watchmen-wannabee series.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 07 August 2007 at 10:25am
|
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=124292 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=124292
Dynamic Man

Lightning bolts on costumes is always money, I must admit. If I was a superhero, I'd have lightning bolts somewhere, even if I was just a strong guy. Worked for Doc Samson.
|
Posted By: Mark Haslett
Date Posted: 07 August 2007 at 10:36am
It's just something about his
artwork, it brings out more of the ugliness, mundane and earthy nature of
the human figure instead of its beauty. *** ...with a Vengeance!
Based on these posts (esp. that Captain America reinterpretation), this guy is determined to suck the fun out of comics like a vacuum cleaner. It looks like Gibbons if Gibbons were only allowed to use department store dummies.
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 07 August 2007 at 10:51am
One thing someone pointed out at Newsarama: The Blue Blade clearly wore a shirt in his one and only Golden Age appearance, but for some reason the colorist screwed up.
Here's a reasoning for the costume Weston gave him: He stabs his opponents while they're busy laughing themselves to death after seeing him.
Personally, I think Weston's art is a fairly good fit for the project: from what I've seen from these designs, his style (and I don't know if this is his usual style or not, as I've never heard of him before) looks like a throwback to some of the Golden Age artists that worked for lesser known companies. But I won't be reading The Twelve due to who the writer is.
-------------
|
Posted By: Armindo Macieira
Date Posted: 07 August 2007 at 10:54am
I wouldn't fight crime in my underwear showing my hairy legs, that's for sure!!
-------------
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 07 August 2007 at 11:33am
|
I understand where you're coming from, Ed. Weston said that he went for a James Cagney kinda thing with the Witness and I think that actually came across. The uncolored character sketch in the first press release was also quite good - in my opinion.
I don't want to get too down on the book before I've actually seen it, and despite my reticence over JMS involvement - so I'll just keep my fingers crossed between now and then.
I do however, agree with you on the appearance of the * Black Widow and to a certain extent the Blue Blade as well. I had high hopes for Capt. Wonder over the weekend, but was definitely let down by the image that was shown on Monday.
* Ed, it occurs to me that the description that you gave for the Black Widow actually may work, based on her golden age origin as an agent for Satan.
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: Stan Lomisceau
Date Posted: 07 August 2007 at 3:41pm
if they have wanted to make another watchmen series than maybe they should think again.
-------------
|
Posted By: Andrew Kneath
Date Posted: 07 August 2007 at 5:29pm
|
Chris Weston is an excellent artist. (I loved his work on Ministry of Space for example)
That said I am not sure if that makes him an excellent superhero artist? I tend to think not.
His style and most obvious influences are very old school British. Nothing wrong with that at all, but if you try to draw American style comics in that realistic way it can end up looking very stiff and undynamic.
http://www.chrisweston.co.uk/ - http://www.chrisweston.co.uk/
JB, do you have any thoughts you would like to share in the difference between the British and American styles? How do you think Hampson, Bellamy, Lawrence etc would have fared had they worked for DC/Marvel?
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 08 August 2007 at 1:33pm
|
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=124457 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=124457
ELECTRO

Something about this bothers me...it's like, supposed to be a preview to give some indication of what to expect from Weston, but we get a 3D animation instead. Maybe this is standard for artists, as he suggests...how difficult is it to keep the size of the character consistent with stuff around it? I notice artists these days draw the Hulk in various sizes more than Spider-Man's strength level fluctuates...one minute the Hulk is King Kong size, the next he's barely bigger than Ben Grimm.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 10 August 2007 at 9:58am
|
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=124602 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=124602

I love the name FIERY MASK...I mean, that's a cool superhero moniker.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 10 August 2007 at 10:03am
|
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=124744 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=124744

Again, that Golden Age creepy-cool...actually looks even better in the original comic.
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 10 August 2007 at 10:15am
|
I'm wondering if this thread ought to be renamed: Superpowers and/or The Twelve.
These characters do look good, for the most part, and now Mastermind Excello has been selected for next Monday's debut. That leaves only three "reveals" to go. Wonder who they'll be?
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 10 August 2007 at 11:26am
Love the Fiery Mask design. The Laughing Mask, however....not so much. I wish they had gone with the Purple Mask identity.
-------------
|
Posted By: Joe Zhang
Date Posted: 10 August 2007 at 2:35pm
Fiery Mask is pretty cool.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 11 August 2007 at 1:09pm
|
I was thinking the thread evolved into encompassing all the "Golden Age" projects in the pipeline, including Erik Larsen's and any others that pop up.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 12 August 2007 at 7:28pm
|
You've got to admit, if the Laughing Mask was creeping up on you, that would scare the living heartworms out of you.
|
Posted By: Andy Mokler
Date Posted: 12 August 2007 at 7:51pm
|
Something about this bothers me...it's like, supposed to be a preview to give some indication of what to expect from Weston, but we get a 3D animation instead.
When I was browsing around on his site he's used 3-D models as reference on other books he's worked on. Why they chose to use the model instead of the artwork is curious but I don't think the character will look like that in the comic.
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 13 August 2007 at 5:25am
|
Even more irritating that the computer model used to represent Elektro in the 12 revealing days of "The Twelve", is that todays Mastermind Excello is presented in black & white.
This artwork was shown in the earliest preview on Newsarama, so there's nothing new here. Minor quibble, but I would have liked to see this guy in color - like all the rest have been.
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 13 August 2007 at 4:37pm
|
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=125096 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=125096
MASTERMIND EXCELLO

You know, I actually think lack of color makes Weston's work seem less...stiff.
I wonder if anyone has introduced a character into a color comic who lacked color, not merely being "black and white" but without color due to belonging to some other dimension where color does not exist.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 13 August 2007 at 4:38pm
|
Another update on SUPERPOWERS, interview with Alex Ross:
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=125175 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=125175
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 14 August 2007 at 5:42pm
|
I'm going to add this into this thread, which probably should be called GOLDEN AGE RETURNS or something...
The Invaders of the 1940s are going to be crossing over with the Avengers, in a time travel story by Alex Ross...with the 1940s Invaders traveling forward in time. Ross wants to go right back to the original ALL-WINNERS SQUAD, as that was the Invaders' name before Roy Thomas' retcon.
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=125258 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=125258
Personally, I'd like the idea more if it wasn't in current Marvel continuity...Skrulls, Civil War, Hulk blah blah blah...boring. But, Ross seems intent on "having fun" as he put it, so we'll have to see.
Checks in its favor: Stephen Sadowski is on the art, Jim Kruger is co-plotting with Ross and another Kruger. I mean, that's quality dudes involved...
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 14 August 2007 at 5:45pm
|
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=125240 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=125240
MISTER E

I'm all over any character in a hat and double .45s.
|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 14 August 2007 at 5:53pm
|
Hmmm... The more characters I see, the more interested I become...
|
Posted By: Mike Murray
Date Posted: 14 August 2007 at 5:53pm
Re: Avengers/Invaders...
Ordinarily if a current creator expressed a desire to have "fun" with the return appearance of older characters, I'd be worried about the laughs being at the expense of those character's dignity... but I don't think that'll be a problem with Ross.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 14 August 2007 at 6:40pm
|
I did like that Ross feels he's past trying to justify superheroes...now he's more interested in the characters and the fun and the stories.
That justifying was probably the reason Ross "lost it" as he grew more and more obsessed with realizing comics characters as "real" and losing the basic appeal of comics art and presentation of these characters. His sketches seem to suggest he's no longer concerned with figuring out "how" to make the Flash legit...he just is.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 15 August 2007 at 10:09am
|
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=125392 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=125392
PHANTOM REPORTER

Well, if Weston had to reverse the colors in order to distinguish PR from Mr. E, why not find another character to place in the series...seems kind of doofy to put two visually identical characters in the same story.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 15 August 2007 at 10:41am
Its always a shame when people get tarred with such broad generalizations. I know Alex has somehow gained a rep for being egomaniacal or thinking his ideas are absolute, but honestly that reminds me of several OTHER creators who just know what they know as truth, no? Ive had several 2hr+ phone call conversations with Alex about The Invaders . He is incredibly reverential about everything he does..Invaders/Avengers is no different. He wants nothing more than to make them as fun as they deserve to be. I hope the Alex Ross haters will give the book a chance based on its own merits, and seperate the creators from the story. All we can do is our best, and we intend to put our ALL into it!
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 15 August 2007 at 12:09pm
|
J. Michael Straczynski selected the characters that were to be utilized in "The Twelve."
Weston visually interpreted them based on their classic golden age appearances.
If we disallow characters within the same team because of similar costume appearance, then we've got alot of cutting to do at every comics company out there.
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 15 August 2007 at 3:30pm
|
If we disallow characters within the same team because of similar costume appearance...
Weston himself did a color inversion of the two characters in order to distinugish them...that to me is a fundamental problem. It's like having a team with two blondes in fishnets, two men made of steel, two black Green Lanterns, and so on. I'd think for the sake of balance (unless either Mr. E or the Phantom Reporter is not a direct part of the main storyline but serves as only narrator) that you use some other character to fill out the 12.
Plus, I don't trust JMS like I trust Alex Ross to pull off at the very least a comic story that maintains these characters' integrities. There might actually be a reason for the similarity of the characters in JMS' work here. EDIT I don't want to completely be negative, but JMS plus "realism" in the art sends more red flags than a Chinese New Year Parade.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 15 August 2007 at 3:39pm
|
hope the Alex Ross haters will give the book a chance based on its own merits, and seperate the creators from the story. All we can do is our best, and we intend to put our ALL into it!
When Alex Ross is having fun, everyone who loves superheroes has fun, especially here. And again, Ross' good taste in co-creators remains top notch with yourself, Mr. Sadowski. Good luck.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 15 August 2007 at 6:09pm
Thanks, Chad!
'Steve' is good, as well..;)
|
Posted By: Paul Greer
Date Posted: 15 August 2007 at 6:18pm
|
I'm with Wallace. The more I see, the more I become interested in these projects.
-------------
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 15 August 2007 at 6:44pm
Unfortunately, for the INVADERS/AVENGERS I don't really care for the current Marvel continuity, I don't care for the current Avengers, and I don't like Bru's retcons concerning Bucky. So, while I have enjoyed the few Ross projects I've sampled, there's not enough here to warrant me trying it out. If it was the Invaders and golden-agers vs super-nazis, I'd get it. That said, I'm sure it will be a success for Marvel and it's how they should have done the Invaders launch a couple of years back, big name and proven popular creators with a draw of their own.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 15 August 2007 at 8:22pm
|
I wonder how INVADERS/AVENGERS meshes with THE TWELVE...both feature Golden Agers transported to modern times.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 16 August 2007 at 8:52am
|
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=125573 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=125573
ROCKMAN

Okay, you gotta love a guy called Rockman. The more I learn about the Golden Age the more I start to understand where Stan Lee got a lot of his genius...he's like the Quintin Tarantino of his day, recycling bits of information into new forms that became icons...
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 17 August 2007 at 3:19pm
|

Okay, going back to this image...this is a preview for the TWELVE, and we've seen all the members covered. So why is Cap, Sgt. Fury, and the Destroyer prominently displayed while the Twelve are background.
Also, who is the faceless guy in the Nemesis-looking uniform with the stylized Y or V symbol on his chest on Sgt. Fury's right?
|
Posted By: Peter Svensson
Date Posted: 17 August 2007 at 3:23pm
|
I think it's supposed to get across the idea that these aren't the Invaders, they aren't the big name golden age heroes, but that they did exist in the 40s.
|
Posted By: Andrew Kneath
Date Posted: 17 August 2007 at 3:40pm
|
Also, who is the faceless guy in the Nemesis-looking uniform with the stylized Y or V symbol on his chest on Sgt. Fury's right?
That's Night Raven a 1930's pulp type character who originally appeared in Marvel UK's Hulk weekly back in 1979. (I remember getting the first issue.)
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 17 August 2007 at 3:41pm
The guy next to Fury is a British hero named Night Raven. Don't know if any of his adventures have ever been published in the U.S., though; I only know about him from a few websites I've visited that had info on him.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 17 August 2007 at 4:06pm
|
Shoot...I knew I'd seen him somewhere before. Here's an exhaustive history http://marvunapp.com/Appendix/nhtraven.htm - http://marvunapp.com/Appendix/nhtraven.htm
Pretty damned cool character actually. I'd come across Night Raven recently and forgot about it.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 17 August 2007 at 4:13pm
Apart from not looking very dynamic, another thing that bothers me about the piece is there doesn't seem to be much thought as to any strategy being used by the heroes ie at front and center are 3 fairly normal men (Sgt Fury, Captain America, and the Destroyer) whereas your guys that are either bulletproof, superstrong, or not even living are BEHIND them in the middle of a bunch of normal soldiers and such whereas logic would dictate the opposite, that the most invulnerable would take point.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 17 August 2007 at 4:16pm
|
It's true...the piece is stagy at best. Not really poor; looks more like the Invaders and Friends are on a photo shoot, not actually storming Berlin.
|
Posted By: Andrew Kneath
Date Posted: 18 August 2007 at 1:52pm
|
Apart from not looking very dynamic, another thing that bothers me about the piece is there doesn't seem to be much thought as to any strategy being used by the heroes.
With respect I think the strategy thing is nit-picking a bit, but I also mentioned the lack of dynamics in Westons art a few pages back. I really like his art which incidentally IMO looks much, much better in black and white however I don't think Weston is an ideal super hero artist.
His characters are so realistically drawn they lack that larger than life element that was so well described in Lee and Buscema's "How to Draw Comics the Marvel way!" Perhaps he would be better as a finisher when it comes to this kind of book?
The sad truth is that Weston was born to draw the kind of comics that they they stopped publishing in Britain 30+ years ago.
The guys a real talent though, I'd really like to see his work on a more appropriate vehicle. As his work on DC's "War Story : Johann's Tiger" shows he is an excellent choice for a realistic WWII book...
http://www.chrisweston.co.uk/warstory.html - http://www.chrisweston.co.uk/warstory.html
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 22 August 2007 at 2:41pm
|
Interesting article speaking to the Public Domain issue, especially where it concerns the Nedor Publishing superheroes being employed by SUPERPOWERS, AC Comics, Larsen's project, or JB's usage if he was so inclined.
http://www.newsarama.com/dynamitenew/Superpowers/PublicDomai nHeroes.html - http://www.newsarama.com/dynamitenew/Superpowers/PublicDomai nHeroes.html
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 09 September 2007 at 2:17pm
|
A fella handed off to me something I didn't know existed.
TSR, a role-playing entertainment source primarily associated with AD & D, issued a couple of Agent 13 "graphic novels" which then went into a more generic "Double Agent" novels, perhaps called 13: ASSASSIN?
Supposedly they were "tie-ins" to the role-playing games TSR had been producing that was NOT AD&D.
The PulpNet lists these books as such:
Agent 13 – This series by Frank Dille and David Marconi was about a man fighting a world-wide secret society in the 1930s. The third book was published with "Web of Danger," by Aaron Allston, in the first of the Double Agent series. There were more Double agent books, but no more Agent 13 stories. There was also an Agent 13 comic book and role-playing game.
- "The Midnight Avenger"
- "Serpentine Assassins"
- "Acolytes of Darkness"
Again, the information missing here about the graphic novel I was shown is that the great Dan Spiegle is on the art chores. A man who has penciled just about every iconic character in the world and those besides, Spiegle's input only made me more excited to discover this Agent 13 adventure.

Beautiful cover by Jeff Butler, who also tackled the Green Hornet in STING OF THE GREEN HORNET from Now Comics.
For those, like me, who hadn't stumbled across this Agent 13 work, I highly, enthusiastically recommend it. The work is excellent, a smart comic with little background, a compelling central character who brands his victims with a golden ring on his fist, Phantom style, scarring them in death with the number "13". Agent 13 is also a master of disguise, Avenger/Unknown Soldier/Nemesis/Human Target precursor, and a completely uncompromised immoral character who is all about "the mission".
At one point, apprehended for questioning, the disguised Agent 13 is being driven to the police station by three just-doing-their jobs street cops. Agent 13 muses, "If only they had believed my story, there would be three less widows by tomorrow morning. There are nine different ways to kill them. I need only choose the least painful."
That is wonderful writing. Just beautiful. I've never heard of Dille or Marconi, but they write a nice, simple piece of pulp fiction with a thoroughly surprising amount of innovation and GUTS. The creators aren't afraid to have Agent 13 kill an SS officer while disguised as Jesus Christ on a cross, his chosen weapon ONE OF THE NAILS holding "Jesus" on the cross. That's on page two. The rest of the book is just as awesome.
Anyone have any more information on the series? Or even heard of them?
|
Posted By: Dan Burke
Date Posted: 09 September 2007 at 2:21pm
|
This may be written in plain english and I am just missing it, but is Ross doing interiors on this or only plots/covers?
|
Posted By: Sam Karns
Date Posted: 09 September 2007 at 2:22pm
|
I saw Ross' piece on Captain America, I thought he should have made a one shot project with the good captain.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 09 September 2007 at 2:36pm
|
I don't know if the series artist has been announced on SUPERPOWERS.
Ross is consulting, designing, and covers.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 09 September 2007 at 3:58pm
|
Erm..<I> am doing the interiors of the #0 issue of SUPERPOWERS. The regular interior Artist hasnt been announced yet.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 09 September 2007 at 4:16pm
|
Sorry, Stephen. I got my series mixed. I knew you were involved on one of them.
Any lowdowns you can offer?
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 09 September 2007 at 5:47pm
No problem Chad.. Actually, just to clarify..Directly after I finish SUPERPOWERS I move on to the Avengers/Invaders series..;) Easily confused, they were both announced the same week. As far as Art 'lowdown' goes..Alex is doing a few of the interior pages in the issue. I don't know whether that will continue in the ongoing, but I've seen some of the work for the issue I'm doing, and they are just beautiful. If you like his work, at least.
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 10 September 2007 at 5:51am
Sadowski's involvement in the series (even briefly) is a real plus and the heads up on Ross producing a few interior pages is also welcome news.
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 10 September 2007 at 8:20pm
Thanks Chuck!
BTW, the first cover of Avengers/Invaders is up at Newsarama..within the Bendis 'Secret Invasion' thread..check it out!!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 10 September 2007 at 9:11pm
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 10 September 2007 at 9:17pm
HEY!! Nice, you posted it!!
This has been my Desktop for some time now. I think its just beautiful, personally.
SO NICE to see Alex doing current mainstream Marvel characters.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 10 September 2007 at 9:34pm
|
Once I saw Bucky with the machine gun, I had to post it. I'll promote anything and everything Golden Age until the characters get the respect they deserve. Which I'm sure is etched in tattoo ink on Roy Thomas' bicep as well.
|
Posted By: Joe Zhang
Date Posted: 10 September 2007 at 10:05pm
|
I think the figures of the Golden Age heroes is clipped from Ross' Marvels. The figures of the New Avengers doesn't look like Ross' work.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 10 September 2007 at 11:00pm
No. You are thinking of the last page fromMarvels #1 with the Invaders dropping in.
TOTALLY different shot. This is an all new piece by Alex.He sent me the preliminary painting himself.
<note: In the original painting Spider-Man had the black costume, thats how long this has been in the works...>
|
Posted By: Sam Karns
Date Posted: 10 September 2007 at 11:49pm
|
Could someone upload the Captain America piece Ross did? Red, white, and blue
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 11 September 2007 at 5:34am
|
I've always liked Luke Cage, whether as a Hero for Hire or as Power Man,
but .. (and as that painting reveals),
Marvel's insistence on having Cage dress in ordinary street clothes instead of a superhero union suit, really makes him appear to be nothing other than a token black.
Cage's yellow and blue costume was okay with me. If that seems dated to some folks, at least give the guys his chops and put him in something cooler than a t-shirt and jeans. And please don't give me that "street cred" horseshit as justification for his current appearance.
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: David Ferguson
Date Posted: 11 September 2007 at 5:44am
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 23 September 2007 at 11:42am
|
I wanted to toss this onto the "Golden Age" thread for a couple of reasons.


First of all, this character is a Mike Mignola hunk of brilliance, a loving tribute to Agent 13, the Phantom, The Shadow, the Spider, the Sandman; an extrapolation of the Pulp genus.
Second of all, the above single comic is the first actual comic, not trade, nor borrowed from my artist pal (just to keep up with Trends), that I've bought straight up "off the rack" since maybe 1989.
There was just no way I was waiting for the trade.
Primarily what I wanted to point out, moreso than the Mignola script and cover, the wonderful character of Lobster Johnson ("Here is the Claw!" I almost wept from joy), is the artwork of Jason Armstrong.
This cat is like equal parts Kirby, Darwyn Cooke, and Mignola himself. It's solid and thrilling while being evocative and cool. The ish is mainly set-up but that's to be understood and forgiven, with the sweet action and bits of nice character intros. There's also another fabulous Mignola creation featured in the book and on the cover, a suit of grey experimental military armor that the Nazis are after. A big fat nod and an exciting bit of business.
Five issues of this stuff. Please buy this book so we can get more of the Claw.
|
Posted By: Victor Rodgers
Date Posted: 23 September 2007 at 12:08pm
|
Cage's yellow and blue costume was okay with me. If that seems dated to some folks, at least give the guys his chops and put him in something cooler than a t-shirt and jeans. And please don't give me that "street cred" horseshit as justification for his current appearance.
*****
I liked the blue and white one from the 99 Heroes For Hire series.
-------------
|
Posted By: Eric Lund
Date Posted: 23 September 2007 at 1:35pm
|
Luke Cage's costume was a nod to Doc Savage and in my mind is how he should look. The current "Gang Banger" look I think is more insulting and stereotyping then his original outfit ever was
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 26 September 2007 at 7:06pm
|
Because it deserves to be whored and I hope all of you guys check it out so, like BPRD, we might get more great Lobster Johnson stuff:
Issue 2

And the proposed issue 3:

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 13 October 2007 at 3:45pm
|
http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12083 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12083
I missed this interview with Jim Krueger, who is writing SUPERPOWERS with Alex Ross.
It's annoying to hear the words "grow" and "change" in relation to comic book characters, but the difference is that these characters are in the public domain, essentially forgotten. This is Ross/Krueger's version of these characters, as Alan Moore put forth the same characters in TOM STRONG, and AC Comics has their versions, and First Comics had theirs, and Erik Larsen's Image project will have theirs.
|
Posted By: George Peter Gatsis
Date Posted: 13 October 2007 at 4:17pm
all these characters... public domain!??
I avoided this thread, cause it didn't appeal to me... when I took a peek... oh
boy!!!
This is very interesting...
I thought the stuff in Tom Strong were original, not re-imaged...
is there a list of what comics and what characters are in the public domain?
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 13 October 2007 at 9:55pm
|
Almost every character that's part of the "Terra Obscura" storyline is a public domain character (I think). I haven't read the TOM STRONG stuff, but I recently read the TERRA OBSCURA trades, which have the surviving characters.
Again, there are at least four different versions of the Black Terror I'm aware of, one an original series by Dan Brereton at some point. Another series I've yet to lay hands on, with Chuck Dixon and Beau Smith as writers.

|
Posted By: Michael Huber
Date Posted: 14 October 2007 at 9:11am
|
Okay, let me say right up front, i haven't read more than maybe 10 comic books in the last 7 years, ( marriage, kids, etc...) but...
The guy in the back is Luke Cage? I thought it was some version of Black Goliath! And that's the current line-up of the Avengers? Spider-man and Wolverine? Maybe this is blasphemy but I'm absolutely sick of Wolverine. A contributing factor to not really reading much anymore. And it's not that I hate the character, it's that the saturation level is plain overwhelming. One day it'll be Wolverine comics, not Marvel.
------------- 'The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'-Ronald Reagan
|
Posted By: David Ferguson
Date Posted: 14 October 2007 at 10:51am
Maybe this is blasphemy but I'm absolutely sick of Wolverine
*******
Not blasphemy in my eyes or for others on the JBF.
See the "when did you lose interest in Wolverine" thread
-------------
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 14 October 2007 at 4:47pm
I'm not aware of any list. My own research has indicated that the works from the following companies are public domain: 1) Standard/Nedor/Better - Fighting Yank, Captain Future, Grim Reaper, Wonderman, Doc Strange, American Eagle, American Crusader, Black Terror, the Scarab, Miss Masque, Woman in Red, among others. Sole exception is some of their Phantom Detective pulps.
2) Fiction House - Mostly genre titles and characters in comics and pulps. Sole exception that I have found was Sheena.
3) Centaur - Amazing Man, Mighty Man, the Shark, the Eye, Masked Marvel. Notice a lot of their heroes' names got recycled over the years by other companies. Marvel owns the Malibu version of these characters.
There are some with SUPERPOWERS as well as the Image project that are a bit questionable. The Owl was seen at Dell, we know some Fox properties ended up with Charlton even if all they made big use of was Blue Beetle, and Image is also using Captain Freedom, Shock Gibson and Pat Parker who were published by Harvey.
While Krueger's version isn't the only version of the characters, it doesn't mean I have to care for his take. From his interviews, he likes the type of superhero stuff like CIVIL WAR and this will allow him that kind of freedom where JUSTICE didn't. Yet JUSTICE seemed to be a big success from what I've seen, more critically acclaimed than the main League title, a big part of it was that it was the classic iconic characters acting like themselves and free of the last 20 years of revisions. I'd rather see something with the heroes as heroes fighting classic villains, alien invasions, giant robots, etc. You know, fun. I don't need another title with heroes going bad, cynicism, etc. Heck, we got that with some of these characters in TERRA OBSCURA. In that sense, it'll be similar to Marvel's THE TWELVE with their golden-age characters.
Afraid I didn't care for the Eclipse BLACK TERROR. It looked good, but had nothing to do with the character beyond borrowing the costume. It could have just as easily been any name and costume.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 15 October 2007 at 3:20pm
|
Yah, I don't get that SUPERPOWERS is going to do much to be "fun". Which is a shame, since it would be nice to see a diversity among the characters, as there is in ASTRO CITY...some characters have a "fun" edge, some are bizarre supernatural, some are evocative, and so on.
I loved GOLDEN AGE by James Robinson, which this SUPERPOWERS project sounds like. But the strength of GOLDEN AGE was in the old JSAers and Golden Age characters struggling with irrevelancy. These characters in S-POWERS lack even revelancy, unless you're a comics historian. It might be nice to see what the characters of S-POWERS were, before we see what they're become. As we know, the media does tend to exaggerate, so comics would follow suit and distort a character who is truly competent and brave into more of a caricature of superheroics, and so on.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 18 October 2007 at 6:29pm
|
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=133403 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=133403
A little more information about the series, SUPERPOWERS, coming in late December apparently.
Visitor Stephen Sadowski gets some face-time (I feel like they're down-playing you, dude! About time you got your two cents in!).
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 18 October 2007 at 6:34pm
|
Uh, there is one OMFG moment, when Ross mentions Michael Turner is involved somehow in "incentive covers". I threw up in my mouth a little. Ugh. Jesus.
|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 18 October 2007 at 7:00pm
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 18 October 2007 at 7:27pm
Guys, I gotta say..the issue turned out very well..EASILY my best work to date.I dont want to say too much more about it, because I know there are 'self promotion' rules here. The script was home run to me..and I guess depending on what KIND of comics you enjoy, will have a lot of bearing on whether you dig it or not. Personally, I like serious takes on my Superhero comics. There are NO 'tongue in cheek' nods to a goofier time. Its really treated with a lot of respect.
The intro issue ( #0) is very MUCH about who these guys ( specifically Fighting Yank) are/were during their heyday, and where exactly they all 'disappeared'. Its definitely NOT completely 'grim n gritty' nor is it slapstick. I think its a really great well balanced take on these guys. As I was drawing it, I could envision any number of these guys getting solo books. Maybe if it does well enough they might! I hope you guys will at least give it a peek at the shop in Dec.
And hey, for $1.00 ..how could you NOT!?
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 18 October 2007 at 7:50pm
|
Stephen, I can only hope that someone in the Dynamite offices is going to realize that your involvement is something to herald as well.
Damn good pencilers don't exactly grow on trees nowadays.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 19 October 2007 at 8:08am
Have to admit, I love Ross' take on the Fighting Yank here.
-------------
|
Posted By: Martin Redmond
Date Posted: 19 October 2007 at 8:31am
|
QUOTE:
| Uh, there is one OMFG moment, when Ross mentions Michael Turner is involved somehow in "incentive covers". I threw up in my mouth a little. Ugh. Jesus. |
|
|
Why keep it in your mouth when Turner's covers provide you with a clear target?
|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 19 October 2007 at 10:32am
|
Uh, there is one OMFG moment, when Ross mentions Michael Turner is involved somehow in "incentive covers".
***
Because we know all Golden Age heroines were part silicone.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 22 October 2007 at 3:32pm
|
All right. According to newsrama, the cover for SUPERPOWERS ish 1.
But what the hell is this about "After the super-selling #0, Dynamite launches Alex Ross’ Superpowers #1"? How can something that hasn't come out yet be "super-selling"?

|
Posted By: Eric Smearman
Date Posted: 22 October 2007 at 11:25pm
|
Stephen- I'm a big fan of your work on JSA and am really looking forward to seeing your pencils in both of these projects.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 23 October 2007 at 1:34am
Thanks, Eric..I hope it lives up to your expectations..Ive been knee deep in Nazis for several weeks now!! Theres definitely something rewarding about drawing Superheroes fighting Nazis .I always wanted the JSA to fight Nazis ( just seemed RIGHT somehow <shrug>), but never got Geoff to do it while I was on watch..Nice to finally get this outta my system..AND HOW!!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 30 October 2007 at 10:14pm
|
I wanted to post the latest preview covers, by Mignola, to the concluding parts of LOBSTER JOHNSON: THE IRON PROMETHEUS, parts four and five, releasing in Dec, Jan.
Again, in case anyone is curious, Lobster Johnson is a Pulp-inspired character, on a Golden Age thread by virtue of his illiciting the wonderful style of those very creative times. A truly great homage by Mignola.


|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 01 November 2007 at 7:04pm
|
http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12252 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12252
An interview with JMS about THE TWELVE, using the Golden Age Timely characters.
Scanned pages of Chris Weston's work, in black and white, and color.

I'm not a fan of JMS' work. Weston's art looks a little stiff or something. Definitely an artist who needs color.
On the other hand, his art style does kind of evoke the stiffness of a lot of comics from the 1940s. Only thing is, it's 1940s characters transplanted to modern times. Basically JMS taking Cap's "time travel" and multiplying by 12. Just seems uninspired.
I can't fault JMS for being enthused, and he seems to geniunely like the characters. I'd love the series to work if only because the possibility, however slim, that some characters might garner their own solo series (fat chance). And then maybe some other talent like Paul Pelletier or Dan Slott or Phil Hester could jump on and really DO something.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 01 November 2007 at 7:12pm
Hey Chad, Since you seem to championtheGolden Age thread, did you see the recent Newsarama thread with the Art preview on SUPERPOWERS? Since you are pretty much the exact demographic, love to hear what you think!
|
Posted By: Thomas Moudry
Date Posted: 01 November 2007 at 8:45pm
The Stephen Sadowski art in the Superpowers preview material on
Newsarama was amazing stuff.
-------------
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 01 November 2007 at 10:05pm
Heh, Well, thanks, Thomas!
|
Posted By: Thomas Moudry
Date Posted: 01 November 2007 at 10:33pm
You're welcome, Stephen. I loved your work on JSA, and I'm ready for more!
I'm really eager for Superpowers to start, and I must tell you I'd really like to
see you on a title like Nightwing at some point.
-------------
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 01 November 2007 at 10:37pm
Nightwing is my favorite comic book character of all time..One day, I hope I get chance to draw him! I wonder, has JB ever drawn the Invaders, other than in commissions? Anyone?
|
Posted By: Nathan Greno
Date Posted: 01 November 2007 at 11:08pm
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 12:30am
Huh.
Neat. Steve Epting drew the interiors? I'll have to check that out!
|
Posted By: Lars Johansson
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 4:35am
Who is the publisher of Super-Powers? Is Stephen on that book? Is it out now?
-------------
|
Posted By: Gerry Turnbull
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 5:13am
|
Stephen,

-------------
|
Posted By: Gerry Turnbull
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 5:14am

-------------
|
Posted By: Gerry Turnbull
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 5:15am

-------------
|
Posted By: Gerry Turnbull
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 5:15am
if theres no objections,i was thinking of the Cap run for the next reading club . . .
-------------
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 5:33am
SUPERPOWERS: I thought the preview art was great. Could recognize all the heroes that I could see clearly which is always a plus. Thought having the Green Giant, Phantasmo (?), and a third giant hero (too generic from the back to make out, Vapo Man possibly) taking on the Claw was wonderful. And, the Blue Beetle! Although I have to wonder, is he really public domain? We know he ended up at Charlton, did they not renew the copyrights on the old stories? And the Flame also ended up at another company after Fox. Just the direction the series takes after all of that is what has me on the fence from unequivocally looking forward to it. The funeral in it, I notice a few major heroes from the lines shown so far we've not seen: Doc Strange from Nedor, the Green Mask from Fox (we've now seen Samson, Blue Beetle, and the Flame).
THE TWELVE: Not a fan of Weston's art. So realistic it becomes lifeless and undynamic. And again, it's a series built around making the characters "realistic" and deaths.
THE MARVEL UNIVERSE: I really enjoyed that title with Stern exploring different eras of Marvel history. A series tailor made for me. No surprise it didn't last. The Invaders story was top notch.
BYRNE'S CAP RUN: I have no objections for it to be the next reading club. I love these looking back at the past series.
-------------
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 12:50pm
Wow, Ed, you're good!
Phantasmo, it was! The third Giant was the Boy Kings Giant. He didn't have a name, at least on the ref sheets I was given. There were literally dozens of characters that will be incorporated eventually. If the series does well, I assume they will all make an appearance.
Do you have a favorite from the era?
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 1:49pm
Stephen, I'm a big golden-age fan. Got a website devoted to mostly the
villains but some of the heroes as well at www.geocities.com/
cash_gorman
I saw Boy King, an issue of CLUE COMICS was the first real golden-age
comic I owned, got from a flea market. Otherwise, Fighting Yank, the Owl,
the Black Owl, Nightmare & Sleepy, Zippo are all faves from the non
current DC, Archie & Marvel staples.
It'd be easier to mention ones I never cared much for such as I never
really warmed to the Daredevil stories though I love his costume. There is
such a primal creativity about even the worst of these, back when the
rules weren't set in stone, possibilities just jump off the pages. But I see a
lot of characters that I've longed to see in action again in these pages. I'm
looking forward to the first issue at the very least.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 6:39pm
|
Holy crap. I totally missed this. Link to Sadowski art...I'm as bad as the guys hyping this book, ignoring Mr. Sadowski's involvement (seemingly)!
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=134623&highl ight=superpowers - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=134623&highl ight=superpowers


Nothing like the Black Terror clotheslining a couple of Nazis to get the blood pumping!
Sorry I missed this, Stephen.
|
Posted By: Eric Smearman
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 6:43pm
|
Them are some reeel purty pitchers there, Stephen.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 6:57pm
Its ok, I just wanted to make sure that fans of the Golden Age characters were aware of it..not so much about plugging my involvement ( although glad you like it!)
Weird that those are posted in two pieces, I thought they were joined on that site?
By the way, those are Japanese soldiers, not Nazis.
Can you name ALL the characters???
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 7:38pm
|
I broke the piece into two, so as to not have to shrink it to fit.
I can't name them all, for sure, off hand. LOVE Cat Man smack in the middle. Obvious ones I guess are Black Terror, Samson, Crusader, Daredevil, Green Lama...
Grim Ghost is in there I think. Is that Captain Flag with the star symbol on his chest?
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 8:07pm
American Crusader is the one with the star on his chest.
First panel: Green Giant, the Claw, Airman, Green Lama, Captain Battle, American Crusader, Tim & the Black Terror, American Eagle, Catman.
2nd Panel: Phantasmo, the Owl, Boy King & Giant, unknown delivering the sucker punch to the Claw, Magno, American Crusader, Captain Future, Man of War, Samson, Amazing Man, Fearless Flint (or possibly Man of Metal, both were drawn by Wonder Woman artist H. G. Peters), Hydroman, and Daredevil.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 8:09pm
|
Amazing Man is rolling in the front. Captain Future is in there, I believe.
Is that the Blue Blaze in back?
I can't figure out who the badass is in front without a shirt and in jodpurs. Bronze Man? The original Commander Steel? Doc Strange? Jeez, hard to tell without color.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 8:14pm
|
Fearless Flint...nice pull, Ed. I hope it is.

|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 02 November 2007 at 11:45pm
Yup, Fearless Flint! The giant boy giving the 'kidney shot' is Golden Lad.
Ed, thats VERY impressive!
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 03 November 2007 at 2:43am
Golden Lad! Ah ha. I think I've read a grand total of one of his adventures online. Have to love the Jerry Robinson/Mort Meskin combination. Elements of their combined style reminds me a lot of early Steve Ditko. With what looked like smoke, that character was the one I thought might be Vapo Man as he could grow at least in his origin story. To your credit, I was doubtful about my guess because even from the back, something suggested the character to be younger. And it's great seeing the characters completely faithful to their golden-age and super-heroic appearances, no gun belts, hairy legs, or other realistic additions.
I can honestly say, I never expected to see Boy King in any new comic book adventures. The concept of him and his robot/golemn Giant is so purely golden-age but are great stories. If you want to get some GA comics that aren't too expensive, but with stories and art that are above average, good bets are his home Clue Comics and the Prize Comics, brief home of the Black Owl, some by Simon & Kirby, early pulp-style Green Lama and Dick Briefer's Frankenstein. The Black Owl may also be familiar to some, as the original decided to go to war, he passed his identity on to his best friend who made use of an Owl-ship that is not only very similar to Blue Beetle Ted Kord's Bug, but also THE WATCHMEN's Nite Owl II's ship. I have two Prize Comics and by pure luck they happen to be both the first and last adventures of the second Black Owl
This preview art looks so much like some fan fic I did for my Apa being actually drawn it's scary. Down to the group being lead by the Fighting Yank with the Green Lama being part of the group of command (he was part advisor as well as being leader of the "Secret 6", the group that did more intelligence gathering and internal affairs with the other members always changing, but my GL was more the pulp hero detective). I even used Fearless Flint quite a bit because having a guy whose powers was pretty much some super strength and being bullet proof was handy.
The others that made up my inner circle of command was Don Winslow (figured the military would want someone who was officially military to be there), Thunder Jim Wade (a Doc Savage style pulp adventurer), and Captain Battle (veteran from previous War and thus oversaw their basic combat training).
-------------
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 03 November 2007 at 5:02am
WELL!! The zero issue is TAILOR made for YOU then! Alex provided sketches of literally DOZENS and DOZENS of these characters..I'm sure ONE day they will be collected into the trade or hardcover..as a fan of the Golden Age guys, I think you would LOVE to see them. I didnt even know MOST of them, and I thought they were very cool. I think theres definitely SOMETHING in the air, in regards to these classic heroes that are being resurrected everywhere.
I hope you enjoy it!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 03 November 2007 at 11:31am
|
It still amazes me the depth and breadth of the Golden Age characters...you can feel the enthusiasm of the creators as they come up with some unique superhero/pulp hybrids unlike anything current creators are consistently able to produce. And what's really amazing is that the creators of these characters had no background or precedent for that sort of thing...they were literally flying blind, with no Stan Lee or Kirby, no Justice League, nothing but the basic idea that the publishers were looking for the next Shadow, Doc Savage, Tarazan or the upstart Superman who was changing everything. This time period fascinates me as creators are by and large getting in there and CREATING something. Good times.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 04 November 2007 at 1:31pm
|
For anyone interested in the artist behind LOBSTER JOHNSON, Jason Armstrong: http://www.silverbulletcomicbooks.com/features/1193288043310 09.htm - http://www.silverbulletcomicbooks.com/features/1193288043310 09.htm
Nice little interview, also talking about FERRO CITY, which I haven't read.
This guy impresses me with his art more every time. If we don't have Darwyn Cooke, Armstrong may step in as a reasonable replacement in the comics world.

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 06 November 2007 at 4:40pm
|
Well, the first Michael Turner variant cover for SUPERPOWERS 1...can't figure why it's necessary, but there you go. He brings nothing to the Black Terror, but it does nothing to offend either.
More Stephen Sadowski artwork interiors, for those interested.
http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12327 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12327
You get shots of some extra characters, like the Silver Streak 
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 06 November 2007 at 4:45pm
Chad, I gotta say, I love how you are championing these GA books..Bravo!
I hadnt seen the Turner cover, and I gotta say, thats one of the best of his Ive seen.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 06 November 2007 at 10:03pm
|
Well, I've been dying to get into some kind of discussion on these Golden Age/Pulp characters, as my knowledge is not encyclopedic. Frankly, I had, like many, ignored the period of comics in particular post-Pulp through the first blur of the Silver Age Flash on the page. It's a rough time, particularly because of the lack of information on the people behind those comics and what their thoughts were. Which is why "Alter Ego" by Roy Thomas is a national treasure!
Anyway, I feel I missed the boat on a lot of these wonderful creations. And I'm also dying to see if the public domain ones can be brought back, because I'd love to write some of them. It's a shame to see such good ideas go to waste, like a beautiful spinster on some Maine island who never comes out of the old dark house.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 07 November 2007 at 8:11am
I'm loving to see this art with the original characters, all done up right. Especially the Fighting Yank. I just spotted the Arrow at the funeral scene. Very cool! I'm guessing these preview pages are actually hinting at the deaths of 2 heroes. One, in the urn that Yank retrieves and which he still has after the funeral. The second, if reading the scenes correctly probably dies during that mission.
-------------
|
Posted By: Mike Farley
Date Posted: 07 November 2007 at 10:18am
That Michael Turner cover wasn't bad, and I usually HATE Michael Turner covers.
But if there are going to be two covers (to ANY book) I think that the interior artist should get a chance at one of them. Would love to see some Stephen Sadowski covers.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 07 November 2007 at 1:06pm
Hey Ed!
The mystery of that 'Urn' plays a HUGE part in the story of The SUPERPOWERS, as you will hopefully see in the zero issue. There is a 'death' in the issue, but as you should know reading comics..."if there aint no body...." ;)
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 07 November 2007 at 9:29pm
|
Is Bomber Burns in this thing? 
From http://www.dpccomics.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/theamericanco micshop/index.php?file=gad - http://www.dpccomics.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/theamericancomicsh op/index.php?file=gad
Jack 'Bomber' Burns is a US stunt flyer, who with his co-pilot is attacked by Germans. The Germans kill his co-pilot Dave, and try to kill him also. He lands, steals a Lockheed XP-38 fighter ("The fastest plane in the world") modifies it with special superchargers, twelve browning machine guns, an oerlikon cannon, and a flame thrower from a Australian armoured car; fills it full of incendiary bullets and names it The Firebrand. He then gets himsels a snazzy costume and swears revenge.
Stephen, JB...tell me you don't want to draw that Lockheed and that character. Now that's a two-fisted war-time hero there!
EDIT, by the way, GREAT website "The Golden Age Hero Directory". Just gill-chokingly full of succinct, interesting summations and neat micro-hero representations. Good job by the dudes running that.
|
Posted By: Andy Mokler
Date Posted: 08 November 2007 at 12:33am
|
Hey, that Sadowski guy's pretty good! I might have to expand my comic's buying from 1 book a month to 2!
|
Posted By: John Webb
Date Posted: 08 November 2007 at 1:38am
|
I am pumped by all these golden age books (yes even the JSM one) The art looks top notch on all of them. Stephen passes my good artist test by being able to draw a guy holding a gun correctly. The number of artists that seem to put pistol grips on rifles to make the job of drawing the hand easier depresses me no end.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 08 November 2007 at 1:30pm
Thanks, John! Reference reference reference!!!
Andy, awesome..Now I can say I DOUBLED someones reading!
Chad, alas, there was NO 'Bomber Burns' amongst MY reference..but, never say never!
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 08 November 2007 at 1:40pm
Ok, it ocurred to me that a scavenger hunt of some sort to these guys might be fun for the few following this thread (and are interested)..This probably isnt as difficult as it sounds, in this day and age of the internet..but..
So. Here's a few of my favorite characters that were in Alex's sketches..and a few of these appear in SUPERPOWERS #0. See if you can find images of these guys online, and post 'em!
The Eagle and Buddy Rainbow Boy Man O' Metal V-Man and the V-Boys U.S. Jones Yank and Doodle The Dart and Ace ( ambiguous much?) The Super-American Dynamic Man and Dynamic Boy
Start looking! I dont think those 'mini-mates' thing should be allowable.
|
Posted By: Andy Mokler
Date Posted: 08 November 2007 at 3:38pm
|
Now I can say I DOUBLED someones reading!
----------------------------------------------
Yeah, I'm going to be in real trouble soon. With JB's JSA and FX coming out in the near future I could be quadrupling my spending!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 08 November 2007 at 7:12pm
|
Okay. In order:
The Eagle and Buddy 
Rainbow Boy 
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 08 November 2007 at 7:31pm
|
Man O'Metal (LOVE THIS GUY! Great stuff!) Read a whole issue here http://members.fortunecity.com/srca1941/AAC10-3-1.html - http://members.fortunecity.com/srca1941/AAC10-3-1.html as well as some of these others.

V-Man (no Boys though so far) 
U.S. Jones

Yank and Doodle

The Dart and Ace


Dynamic Man?

Dynamic Boy

|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 09 November 2007 at 6:16pm
|
Any plans for Magno and Davey or the Target and his Targeteers? Those guys are some of my favorite Golden Age lesser lights?
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 11 November 2007 at 12:03pm
|
It doesn't look like Alex Ross is pussyfooting around in his determination to make Daredevil or The Devil into a comic book icon, judging by the released cover art for ish 2 of SUPERPOWERS:
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=135756 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=135756

|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 12 November 2007 at 9:20am
I just recently read the Eagle story the pic above was taken from. It's from
early in his career. This look and the villain in this story was re-used later
for the Fox character, the Lynx (who was also supposedly a re-tooling of
the Moth/Mothman on threat from DC over being too similar to Batman).
A few issues later, the Eagle sport a very different and much better
costume.
If you're talking "Dynamic Man and Dynamic Boy", Dynamic Boy was the
younger brother & sidekick to Dynamic Man. He sported an identical
costume and powers as his older brother (this was never explained as
how it jibed with Dynamic Man's origin as an android). The Dynamic Boy
in the red was an unrelated character and a solo hero.
Other trivia: V-Man went by the name the Puppeteer after the war though
still a patriotically garbed hero. Yank & Doodle are the sons of the second
Black Owl who took over that hero's identity in part to look over his sons.
Edited to add: Hey POST 1000!!! Cannot believe I had that much to say!
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 12 November 2007 at 7:00pm
|
Ed, I appreciate your posts and you contribute greatly to keeping this thread alive with your knowledge. Thanks again.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 13 November 2007 at 8:55am
My pleasure Chad (suddenly I feel like I'm in a cellular phone commercial).
Of related interest, there are two different Green Lama products in the
offering by other companies. SUPERPOWERS is supposed to use the Green
Lama in a big way. AC Comics has made some minor use of the Green
Lama in the past as part of their vault of heroes and even reprinted a few
of his adventures. Like SUPERPOWERS, their version of the character in the
present day is as a magician type hero when that's not really true to any
of his incarnations. A while back they had solicited a mini-series and it's
been done for about a year I believe but only now just being solicited as
well as a "0" issue that's an "elseworlds" version in regards to their main
continuity universe. It will feature other characters from Spark
Publications (such as Golden Lad). As I provided the writer with
background info on the villain Stopwach (from GL's last appearance in
PRIZE COMICS), I have a little vested interest in it.
Dark Horse meanwhile is releasing a 2 volume hardback archive set of
Spark Publication's 8 issue Green Lama series complete with all the back
stories and fillers. Be warned: they are titling it as the "Complete Green
Lama" HOWEVER even if you ignore his pulp series and radio show, the
Green Lama ran from issues 7 to 34 in PRIZE COMICS before he was done
re-invisioned by Raboy for Spark which aren't part of this set. Also, they
are only doing 4 issues of his comic each in the archives. If the GCDB is
correct, there is only one story, 12 pages, in each issue. So, out of the
200+ pages in each archive, only 48 pages in each is Raboy's Green
Lama. 3/4 of the $50 book is actually non-Green Lama material. Raboy's
beautiful stuff, and one of the other strips contains work by Mort Meskin
but, still, their advertising is more than a little misleading. Wait and get it
cheap on Ebay is my advice.
The Green Lama's original pulp adventures have been getting reprinted by
Adventure House over the past year. They are interesting. A bit pedestrian
in some ways but still have a charm of their own. Stories aren't static
either, the aides he starts off with aren't the same as he ends with as
romantic subplots unfold.
-------------
|
Posted By: Bob Simko
Date Posted: 13 November 2007 at 9:46am
|
AC's MEN OF MYSTERY might be a fun addition for anyone who enjoys the older characters mentioned above.
|
Posted By: Eric White
Date Posted: 13 November 2007 at 10:07am
Ed, I'm surprised the Green Lama fell into the public domain. I have a
question, I really want to read the Raboy Lama stories, which Dark Horse
book do I buy?
-------------
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 13 November 2007 at 10:26am
Both archives will have Raboy Green Lama material. It's just that it
contains all the other stuff in those particular Green Lama comics as well
so only a small percentage of each book is the Green Lama. They could
have gotten all of Raboy's stories into one volume and most of the non-
Raboy Green Lama stories from PRIZE COMICS as well.
You can read one of the Raboy stories for free here:
http://members.fortunecity.com/goldenyears1/AAC1-1-1.html
And to sample his radio show:
http://www.radiolovers.com/pages/greenlama.htm
-------------
|
Posted By: Eric White
Date Posted: 13 November 2007 at 10:32am
Thanks for explaining that, Ed. At first I thught that Raboy wasn't going to
be printed in those books. Thanks for the link, I'll take a look at it, I never
got to read any of the Raboy Green Lama stories and always wondered if
they were any good.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 13 November 2007 at 7:48pm
|
I haven't been able to lay hands on the AC stuff as yet. Are those comics sold mostly online, because I don't think I've ever run across any in the big comic shop I sift through.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 13 November 2007 at 7:53pm
|
Someone posted an issue of the Devil (Daredevil) beating the living hell out of Hitler. This may be the worst beating Hitler ever received:


|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 15 November 2007 at 9:28pm
|
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=136463 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=136463
Mike Allred is working with Erik Larsen on this Golden Age project which is digging up a lot of public domain characters.
Allred taking on Fletcher Hanks' Stardust!

|
Posted By: Charles Jones
Date Posted: 16 November 2007 at 3:10am
|
I love the look he's using for this.
|
Posted By: Lars Johansson
Date Posted: 16 November 2007 at 8:42am
|
Look at Catman's face. He enjoys strangling Hitler almost as much as Kitten gunning down japs on another cover.

-------------
|
Posted By: Lars Johansson
Date Posted: 16 November 2007 at 8:48am
|
I haven't been able to lay hands on the AC stuff as yet.
*********
I have one AC comics compilation with real Golden PD material. The compilation in itself is very cool, the picture quality can't be better, but it was too many pages for the pamphlet format (know no better word), it's a miracle it doesn't explode. It should have been in paperback. It has Black Terror, horror, even Warner Oland. It cost me almost as much as two (!) Essentials or Showcases and is much much thinner.
Added picture below.

-------------
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 16 November 2007 at 9:31am
Normally not a fan of Allred, his style is just a little too pop-art/self
aware for me. But he's a perfect fit for Stardust and Fletcher Hanks own
screwball style. I'm looking forward to seeing this.
-------------
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 16 November 2007 at 10:31pm
|
I think Fletcher Hank's style was second only to Basil Wolverton's as ill-suited to superheroics.
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 17 November 2007 at 3:44am
I wonder if they'll get around to using any of the even more obscure characters, like the Purple Zombie (who only made one appearance).....
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 17 November 2007 at 2:30pm
|
Found this, from Tom Scioli's blog http://tomscioli.blogspot.com/ - http://tomscioli.blogspot.com/

It's Tom Scioli's take on "Space Smith" for the "Next Issue Project" of Erik Larsen's, at Image.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 17 November 2007 at 2:44pm
|
Moonstone Books is a beautiful company http://www.moonstonebooks.com/launch.asp - http://www.moonstonebooks.com/launch.asp
They're releasing some Avenger books next year, with covers by some of the original artists of the paperbacks.
But here's the big news, for me at least: And then stay tuned for a special wide-vision graphic novel where the AVENGER teams up with the SPIDER, as they battle each other AND Dracula!...written by David Michelinie, with art by Eddy Newell!

Seriously, the Spider and the Avenger up against Dracula??? That might be the greatest story ever told. I feel like someone's playing a joke on me here.


|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 17 November 2007 at 10:02pm
Tom Scioli was one of the first names I thought of as being a good match-up with Fletcher Hanks material, his pseudo Kirby wackiness with Hanks' weirdness. I read a few of his GODLAND stuff, not wowed with the writing, but I thought it helped expand his work beyond being just a Kirby clone. Alas, these two panels look to be more like he's trying to draw in a golden-age Kirby style instead of just producing the best art he's capable, reducing it to being just a pastiche, concerned too much in aping a style and form. ----------------------- Name the one guy that
has been Doc Savage, the Avenger, Flash Gordon and the Spider? Steve Holland, model behind the paperback versions of the big pulp heroes (and
other hard-hitting paperback action heroes such as the Enforcer) as
well as starring in a 50's Flash Gordon tv show. Seriously... the team-up between the Spider and the Avenger should be really cool.
-------------
|
Posted By: Bob Simko
Date Posted: 17 November 2007 at 10:25pm
|
AC has an http://www.accomics.com/accomics/goldenage/index.html - online store if you can't find the books on the shelf.
|
Posted By: Paul Greer
Date Posted: 17 November 2007 at 11:09pm
Of all the new "Golden Age" comics, I'm looking forward to The Next Issue Project the most. I really enjoy Scioli's work on Godland and look forward to seeing his Space Smith story.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 17 November 2007 at 11:17pm
|
Not to deviate too much from the thread's intent, but Scioli's one of the few guys around who could have worked back in the Golden or Silver Ages, so it's okay to discuss? I've dug GODLAND pretty well, though I wasn't overpowered with the writing either, Ed. Now, what I do want to read by Scioli is MYTH OF 8-OPUS, which is advertised in the GODLAND trades. Review here: http://www.silverbulletcomicbooks.com/reviews/10002109011394 0.htm - http://www.silverbulletcomicbooks.com/reviews/10002109011394 0.htm

The design on 8-Opus is just great.
http://my.opera.com/AggressorBrad/blog/index.dml/tag/Cover%2 0model - http://my.opera.com/AggressorBrad/blog/index.dml/tag/Cover%2 0model
Go to the above for a nice blog detailing aspects of the Pulp characters, and what this dude terms the "new Pulp" in the Destroyer/Penetrator/Enforcer/Killmaster vein of men's action novels. I just found it by accident looking for this pic of Steve Holland hisownself posing as Doc Savage:

|
Posted By: Paul Greer
Date Posted: 17 November 2007 at 11:30pm
|
From what I've read Scioli and Joe Casey do Godland in the old Marvel method of plot, art, then scripting. Casey can be a little over the top with some of his dialogue but overall it's a fun book.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 19 November 2007 at 3:48pm
|
Another Next Issue Project project, "Captain Kidd" by a dude named Jim Rugg, who is apparently quite adept at drawing awesome Brothers with afros punching vampire brains out of the back of their head. His Cap Kidd doesn't look too bad either...
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=136871 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=136871

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 26 November 2007 at 6:41pm
|
This is a heads-up and a cool one at that.
Dark Horse Comics solicitations has an upcoming Spider statue that looks VERY cool. With interchangable heads no less, depending on "which" Spider you prefer, the slick Green Hornet/Shadow clone or "clean" version or the nasty psychopathic hunchbacked vampire-fanged freak as originally intended.



|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 26 November 2007 at 6:47pm
|
News from Mid-Ohio, concerning the new SPIRIT writing team of Sergio Argones and Mark Evanier: http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=137541 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=137541
Sergio Aragones was signing for fans of his monthly series Groo and his work on Mad Magazine, where he does four pages each month, as well as the beloved little cartoons on the borders of the magazine's pages.
Beginning in January, comics fans will also be reading his work in The Spirit #14 from DC Comics. Aragones is the new regular co-writer of the series, which is being drawn by Mike Ploog and co-written by Mark Evanier.
Aragones says he likes working on The Spirit because it's got "done in one" stories. "That's one thing that Will Eisner taught us when he did The Spirit," he said. "In seven pages, he did a whole story. And when I was a kid, I couldn't believe it. With only seven pages, I was saying, how could he do that? The stories are so long and have so much in them. Now that I'm writing them, it's is a little longer because it's 22 pages, but it's the same thing."
When asked what readers can expect from upcoming issues, Aragones said January's issue is about a murder in an old people's home, and February's deals with a murder in the beauty contest.
"I am so proud that they chose me to write it, being such a fan of Will and he was a friend of mine, so now I'm really excited," he said.
The writer is also working on the six-issue Bat-Lash mini-series for DC Comics, with issue #1 slated to come out December 12th. "It's the character I co-created many years ago, and I'm writing the origin with a gentleman named Peter Brandvold who writes novels. He's a very good Western writer. And the art by John Severin is just beautiful," Aragones said. "We are doing the origin story of Bat Lash, because we touched briefly upon it when we did our original series. We went and just passed it, just said the ranch burned. So this is how they whole thing happened -- the good guys and bad guys and how he lost friends and family. So it's a development of the origin of Bat Lash."
-----
And right next to Aragones' table was his co-writer on The Spirit, Mark Evanier, who said he loves working with his friend on the series.
"Sergio and I have been best friends since the Paleolithic era," he laughed. "So we get along well. We finish each other's sentences – I finish them in English; he finishes them in Spanish. It's the easiest collaboration in the world. I don't feel that it's even work, because it's just having lunch with Sergio, sitting around with him and talking about ideas. The fact that somebody can turn it into a comic book is a bonus."
Evanier said it would be very intimidating if the two of them were following Will Eisner. "But other people have done the Spirit since Will passed, and some even did it when he was around," he said, "so it's a little less intimidating than it might be. They picked us because we are known for doing concise, complete stories that have a sense of humor about them without being too silly. And that's kind of the same thing that Will did. We're trying to keep that same spirit, but it's a more modern interpretation. It's hopefully the kind of thing Will would have done if he were around today."
Evanier also has a hardcover from Abrams Books coming out titled, Kirby: King of Comics.
"It's a book about Jack Kirby, a man whom I have not written about for over an hour," he joked, adding that he's also doing more Groo and working on a new Garfield cartoon series.
|
Posted By: Michael Myers
Date Posted: 26 November 2007 at 9:07pm
|
Hmmm. Including two head versions (grotesque and cover/brief) was a nice enough touch to make up for the ring. Not sold on the statue as a statue of the Spider even with the grotesque mask, though. As a sort of general two-fisted, twin .45s Pulp statue, however, I really dig it!
Thanks for the heads up, Chad!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 26 November 2007 at 11:02pm
|
Is there not a ring? I missed what was being said.
Great avatar by the way, Michael.
|
Posted By: Michael Myers
Date Posted: 27 November 2007 at 10:20am
|
Nah, the ring is legit. I was just letting out with my personal thoughts on giving the Wentworth character such a signet beyond the cover. Too reminiscent of the girasol for my tastes. Even before I learned of the mail-away it seemed derivitive, and now it comes off just exactly as what it was: a marketing ploy. I'm not consistent, I guess. When it comes to the elements of the statue, I'm not ready to give up one of the 1911A1s for the Spider's truly trademark cigarette-lighter. ;)
Chad, you already covered the graphic projects angle, but any thoughts on Moonstone's upcoming Spider Chronicles prose collection? Odd in a comic fan, maybe, but I can't quite overcome my disdain for pastiche long enough to look forward to its release. Chuck Dixon, et al., notwithstanding.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 27 November 2007 at 9:29pm
|
Ah, that's right. The Spider used a specially designed cig lighter to burn his insignia into his victims. I forgot about that.
I've seen the SPIDER CHRONICLES trade, but haven't pulled the trigger to buy it yet. It's one of those things I may ask for Christmas. I should probably start out on the real Pulp deal, but this seems readily accessible right now.
The dude who is being tapped to bring the Spider to life at Moonstone is Tom Floyd...and if I'm going to shill his website while I'm at it, because Captain Spectre is the shite! http://www.captainspectre.com/index.html - http://www.captainspectre.com/index.html

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 29 November 2007 at 5:13pm
|
http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12472 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12472
Andy Kuhn is taking on this Golden Age property as part of the Next Issue Project:

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 06 December 2007 at 5:32pm
|
http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12530 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12530
Matt Wagner's new ZORRO series is coming! Wagner's not doing interiors, but writing and at least the first two ish covers.


|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 08 December 2007 at 10:57pm
|
You'll have to forgive me while I catch up with a character I had heard about peripherally, but hadn't paid attention to.
Is anyone reading this series currently?...I somehow missed the boat.



http://www.silverbulletcomicbooks.com/features/1191914933845 48.htm - http://www.silverbulletcomicbooks.com/features/1191914933845 48.htm interview with the creators, Brian Clevinger and Scott Wegener.
Only a six issue limited series, but I'm dying to read this thing. Exactly precisely what good Pulp is all about.

|
Posted By: Andrew Hess
Date Posted: 08 December 2007 at 11:00pm
Looks like fun! I'll have to remember to give it a look!
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 19 December 2007 at 9:39pm
|
I'm going to mention Joe Casey's THE LAST DEFENDERS here, as he has gone and done something complete f**king cool in his line-up:


That's right. One of the coolest characters of the Golden Age of Marvel. Casey is just a man's man, and I man-love him very much for this.
Other members of the Defenders, Nighthawk, She-Hulk, and Colossus. Interesting and cool. Good for Casey. http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=140235 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=140235
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 20 December 2007 at 12:53am
"Moonstone Books is a beautiful company http://www.moonstonebooks.com/launch.asp
They're releasing some Avenger books next year, with covers by some of the original artists of the paperbacks."
Yikes... I'm doing pencils for the inside illustrations for this book. My buddy Andy Bennett is inking them now.
We're supposed to have the art finshed for Christmas...
Hopefully it will be a neat book!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 20 December 2007 at 7:37pm
|
I'm very much looking forward to it, Dave. Your work is amazing.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 26 December 2007 at 6:53pm
|
An interview with a guy whose name sounds like he was born to draw ZORRO, Francesco Francavilla: http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=140808 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=140808

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 26 December 2007 at 6:55pm
|
The return of Neon the Unknown, in upcoming issues of UNCLE SAM AND THE FREEDOM FIGHTERS: http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12640 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12640

|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 27 December 2007 at 3:56pm
As that book is just another of DC's "honoring" the originals by killing and
villifying half of them and creating "legacy" versions of the majority, I saw
no reason to get it. I get enough of that from the JSA, thank you very
much.
http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12650 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12650
CBR also talks a bit about Flip Falcon as part of the Next Issue Project by
Image Comics. Kinda funny as I was reading earlier today a Flip Falcon
story as part of the ongoing research for my Golden Age
website.

-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 27 December 2007 at 6:52pm
|
I agree, Ed, that USATFF is pretty heinous where it concerns the treatment of Quality characters, but once you've seen the Human Bomb beaten into tomato paste by Bizzaro and Phantom Lady skewered on a spear by Deathstroke, I can't even blink anymore at what DC will do next. Neon the Unknown will probably suffered some psychological indignity just prior to be killed off, that I have no doubt.
High anticipation for the Next Issue Project. I look every day for further news...thanks for posting, Ed.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 27 December 2007 at 7:51pm
|
A Matt Wagner interview concerning the new Zorro from a design standpoint.
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=140906 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=140906
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 30 December 2007 at 10:46pm
For those interested in Golden Age tales, I've posted 2 more Fighting Yank stories from 1943 at my site: http://www.geocities.com/cash_gorman/
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 01 January 2008 at 1:10pm
|
http://www.geocities.com/cash_gorman/ - http://www.geocities.com/cash_gorman/
I'm reiterating this because the site is very cool. Plus one of the pages is called "Hero-Goggles", which is awesome and speaks directly to my belief that all the best characters wear goggles. We may be dabbling here, but there's some really informative stuff on this site. Thanks so much for the heads-up, Ed. I love it.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 02 January 2008 at 9:16am
Thanks for the kind words! (and for making it an actual link, I often forget
that I need to use the link button, that typing it doesn't autmatically make
it) The site had recently been redesigned in hopes to make it easier to
make and showcase updates as its expanded scope was making it a bit
unwieldy. It has been a success in those regards from my end.
"Hero Goggles" was a title I used for a print zine to an Apa that I belonged
to. I came across the term several years ago in a design magazine talking
about a new font. I don't recall if the font was named that or if they just
used the words to show it off. But, I liked the sound of it and seemed
fitting. My brother borrowed the name and some of the articles for
content as he was experimenting with blogs, adsense, google ads, etc. I
later took over the responsibilities to upkeeping it.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 07 January 2008 at 9:33pm
|
Okay, just for the sake of it, I'm going to stretch the qualifications around for "Golden Age" as this character apparently was born of the Silver Age, but retroactively exists within the MU's World War I.

Phantom Eagle...by Howard Chaykin and Garth Ennis.
It's a MAX title, so I'd expect this to fall into line with Chaykin's SHADOW and BLACKHAWK stuff, and Ennis of course is no shrinking violet to getting gruff and nasty with the language and gore, so anticipate a lot of both.
Nice cover though.
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=142228 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=142228
|
Posted By: Mike Norris
Date Posted: 08 January 2008 at 2:12pm
Well there was a Phantom Eagle in the Golden Age. Published by Fawcett
-------------
|
Posted By: Andy Mokler
Date Posted: 08 January 2008 at 3:21pm
|
Thanks for the link. I'll generally take a peek to see what Chaykin's up to but I must say, although these preview pages are well drawn, the storytelling seems a little confusing. I guessing he was going for some kind of pacing effect with the camera angles jumping all over the place but it sure made it hard to follow(for me). I've recently re-read the infamous Alex Toth notes to Steve Rude so my perception may be tainted by that, but these pages look like they're trying to be carried by tricks and pretty drawings rather than good storytelling. Maybe I'm being too harsh but it was surprising to see from a guy that I consider one of the storytelling generation.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 08 January 2008 at 5:19pm
|
Godly Darwyn Cooke's farewell to THE SPIRIT:
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=142359 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=142359

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 08 January 2008 at 5:48pm
|
Well, you know I'll be all over this...a new Pulp Hero-inspired comic courtesy of Image Comics, who seem in full-on Golden Age/Pulp mode, likely driven by Erik Larsen's vision, though I'm speculating. It just SEEMS like Image is heavily into this sort of stuff, all of a sudden.
EDIT: http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12707 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12707

Great title by the way. A "revenant" is
| 2. |
a person who returns as a spirit after death; ghost. |
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 09 January 2008 at 6:15pm
Pssst...Dont tell anyone..but...here's a sneak at Superpowers #0..ssshhhh!!
<edited , cuz I cant figure out how to post an image if my life depended on it...Ah well, a link will have to do...>
Screw it, I'm retarded.

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 22 January 2008 at 5:59pm
|
Gotta promote the Lobster Johnson trade, http://www.tfaw.com/Shops/Hellboy/Profile/Lobster-Johnso ;n:-Iron-Prometheus-Volume-1-TPB___315046 - http://www.tfaw.com/Shops/Hellboy/Profile/Lobster-Johnson:-I ron-Prometheus-Volume-1-TPB___315046
And its cover:

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 22 January 2008 at 6:27pm
|
I ran across this cover from Guy Davis, an adoring throwback for Jeff Frissen and Bob Silva's LUCHA LIBRE comic. This one says it all:

|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 22 January 2008 at 8:01pm
|
That Guy Davis cover makes me want to read the story that follows...
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 22 January 2008 at 9:35pm
|
Okay Golden Age lovers...take the quiz: http://quizfarm.com/test.php?q_id=296828 - http://quizfarm.com/test.php?q_id=296828
Me? Very proud to say...
| Which Golden Age DC Comics Character Are You? |
| You scored as a The Sandman. |
| You are THE SANDMAN: lone, silent nighttime avenger, bringing dark dreams of damnation and remorse to all those who traffic in evil! (1st appearance: (ADVENTURE COMICS #40, July 1939) |
| The Sandman. |
|
75% |
| Green Lantern |
|
67% |
| Hawkman |
|
67% |
| Doctor Fate |
|
63% |
| The Black Canary |
|
63% |
| Hourman |
|
63% |
| Starman |
|
58% |
| The Flash |
|
42% |
| The Vigilante |
|
42% |
| The Guardian |
|
33% |
| Johnny Thunder |
|
29% | |
|
Posted By: Thom Price
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 12:15am
Damn that was a long quiz. I think the SATs are shorter.
| You scored as a The Flash |
| You
are THE FLASH: the first (and greatest) superhero ever to be known as
"The Fastest Man Alive," and a genuine inspiration to everyone around
you! (1st appearance: FLASH COMICS #1, January 1940) |
|
The Flash
|
|
75%
|
|
Hourman
|
|
71%
|
|
Green Lantern
|
|
71%
|
|
Doctor Fate
|
|
63%
|
|
Starman
|
|
50%
|
|
Johnny Thunder
|
|
46%
|
|
The Sandman.
|
|
46%
|
|
Hawkman
|
|
42%
|
|
The Black Canary
|
|
42%
|
|
The Guardian
|
|
29%
|
|
The Vigilante
|
|
21% | |
|
Posted By: Andy Mokler
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 12:35am
|
I'm Doctor Fate. The test didn't even ask if I have blonde hair! Which I do. I also have magic powers. Let's see, I (apparently) have the ability to cast invisible force fields that repel beautiful women and money...I can go into a trance-like state when positioned in front of my magic picture box...I have blue tights and a yellow cape...oops! I've said too much.
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 1:23am
Starman, baby!!!!!
Now I've got to go glue a fin on my head and go get my rod...
that sounds dirty...
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 6:54am
|
Didn't know what to expect with this one, but matching up with Jay Garrick on the super-scale ain't too shabby.
|
| You scored as a The Flash |
| You are THE FLASH: the first (and greatest) superhero ever to be known as "The Fastest Man Alive," and a genuine inspiration to everyone around you! (1st appearance: FLASH COMICS #1, January 1940) |
| The Flash |
|
71% |
| Hawkman |
|
67% |
| Doctor Fate |
|
67% |
| Green Lantern |
|
54% |
| Hourman |
|
46% |
| The Guardian |
|
46% |
| Johnny Thunder |
|
42% |
| The Vigilante |
|
33% |
| Starman |
|
33% |
| The Sandman. |
|
29% |
| The Black Canary |
|
29% | |
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: John Young
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 7:08am
Green Lantern 75% Flash 63% Sandman 63%
This surprised me I thought it would be closer to starman or sandman
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 8:39am
| You scored as a Hawkman |
| You are HAWKMAN: reincarnated Egyptian prince, standing resolutely athwart all the forces of evil alongside the beautiful and steadfast Hawkgirl! (1st appearance: FLASH COMICS #1, January 1940) |
| Hawkman |
|
63% |
| Doctor Fate |
|
58% |
| Starman |
|
50% |
| The Vigilante |
|
50% |
| Johnny Thunder |
|
46% |
| The Guardian |
|
46% |
| The Sandman. |
|
46% |
| Green Lantern |
|
42% |
| The Black Canary |
|
38% |
| The Flash |
|
38% |
| Hourman |
|
33% | | meh.
-------------
|
Posted By: Flavio Sapha
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 8:49am
Posted By: Andrew Hess
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 8:59am
Hmmm, we have a tie:
You scored as a The Flash
You are THE FLASH: the first (and greatest) superhero ever to be known as
"The Fastest Man Alive," and a genuine inspiration to everyone around
you! (1st appearance: FLASH COMICS #1, January 1940)
The Flash 88%
The Sandman 88%
Green Lantern 83%
Starman   ; 71%
Hourman   ; 71%
Hawkman 71%
Doctor Fate 71%
Black Canary 71%
The Guardian 63%
Johnny Thunder 54%
The Vigilante 38%
-------------
|
Posted By: Adam Hutchinson
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 9:07am
|
|
Another tie. The Sandman score surprised me.
You scored as a Green Lantern |
| You are THE GREEN LANTERN: wielder of the single greatest weapon the universe has ever known: the Power Ring! (1st appearance: ALL-AMERICAN COMICS #16, July 1940) |
| Green Lantern |
|
75% |
| The Sandman. |
|
75% |
| Doctor Fate |
|
63% |
| The Flash |
|
58% |
| Johnny Thunder |
|
54% |
| Hawkman |
|
54% |
| Starman |
|
50% |
| Hourman |
|
42% |
| The Guardian |
|
38% |
| The Vigilante |
|
21% |
| The Black Canary |
|
17% | |
-------------
|
Posted By: Aric Shapiro
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 9:18am
|
I was not expecting this:
| Doctor Fate |
|
75% |
| The Flash |
|
63% |
| Hourman |
|
58% |
| The Sandman. |
|
58% |
| Starman |
|
54% |
| Hawkman |
|
50% |
| Green Lantern |
|
46% |
| Johnny Thunder |
|
38% |
| The Guardian |
|
33% |
| The Black Canary |
|
29% |
| The Vigilante |
|
21% |
Does this mean I now need a Doctor Fate commission?
-------------
|
Posted By: Adam Hutchinson
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 9:20am
Yes Ari it does.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 7:21pm
|
Found this awesome Bret Blevins/Terry Austin cover and comic preview for PHANTOM ish 21 from Moonstone. http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12795 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12795

|
Posted By: Michael Arndt
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 7:42pm
|
| Which Golden Age DC Comics Character Are You? |
| You scored as a The Flash |
| You are THE FLASH: the first (and greatest) superhero ever to be known as "The Fastest Man Alive," and a genuine inspiration to everyone around you! (1st appearance: FLASH COMICS #1, January 1940) |
| The Flash |
|
79% |
| The Guardian |
|
75% |
| Doctor Fate |
|
71% |
| Johnny Thunder |
|
63% |
| The Sandman. |
|
58% |
| Starman |
|
58% |
| Hawkman |
|
58% |
| Green Lantern |
|
58% |
| Hourman |
|
50% |
| The Vigilante |
|
46% |
| The Black Canary |
|
29% | |
|
Posted By: Paul Kimball
Date Posted: 23 January 2008 at 9:28pm
the thing is, there aren't really any bad Jsa members
You scored as a Doctor Fate
You are DOCTOR FATE: the solemn, driven sorceror pledged to defend all
of mankind from the countless unseen, supernatural horrors hell-bent
upon its destruction! (1st appearance: MORE FUN COMICS #55, May 1940)
Doctor Fate
75%
Green Lantern
75%
Hourman
71%
The Sandman.
67%
Starman
67%
Johnny Thunder
63%
The Flash
63%
The Vigilante
58%
The Black Canary
50%
The Guardian
46%
Hawkman
42%
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 29 January 2008 at 6:57pm
|
A new retro character, MADAME MIRAGE... http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=144532&highl ight=madame+mirage - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=144532&highl ight=madame+mirage

I can't help being intrigued.
|
Posted By: John Young
Date Posted: 29 January 2008 at 7:29pm
|
The first thing I noticed about the book is the lack of much background. It makes me think of early image work.
|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 29 January 2008 at 8:12pm
|
The quiz:
Hourman 71%
Starman, Sandman, Green Lantern, and Dr. Fate all tied at 67%
|
Posted By: David Haight
Date Posted: 29 January 2008 at 8:23pm
|
| Quiz results: |
|
| Which Golden Age DC Comics Character Are You? |
| You scored as a Green Lantern |
| You are THE GREEN LANTERN: wielder of the single greatest weapon the universe has ever known: the Power Ring! (1st appearance: ALL-AMERICAN COMICS #16, July 1940) |
| Green Lantern |
|
75% |
| The Flash |
|
71% |
| The Guardian |
|
71% |
| Starman |
|
67% |
| Hourman |
|
63% |
| Doctor Fate |
|
63% |
| The Sandman. |
|
54% |
| The Vigilante |
|
33% |
| Johnny Thunder |
|
33% |
| Hawkman |
|
29% |
| The Black Canary |
|
13% | | |
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 30 January 2008 at 5:59pm
|
SUPERPOWERS ish Zero out today?
A review from http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=145000 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=145000
|
Posted By: Brian Tait
Date Posted: 30 January 2008 at 8:59pm
Hey- I'm the one true Green Lantern - Alan Scott! Looks like a toss-up with Doctor Fate though. Must have been that last question that gave me the ring. **********************************************
| You scored as a Green Lantern |
| You
are THE GREEN LANTERN: wielder of the single greatest weapon the
universe has ever known: the Power Ring! (1st appearance: ALL-AMERICAN
COMICS #16, July 1940) |
|
Doctor Fate
|
|
67%
|
|
Green Lantern
|
|
67%
|
|
Starman
|
|
63%
|
|
The Flash
|
|
63%
|
|
The Sandman.
|
|
58%
|
|
The Black Canary
|
|
50%
|
|
The Guardian
|
|
46%
|
|
Hawkman
|
|
42%
|
|
Johnny Thunder
|
|
38%
|
|
Hourman
|
|
25%
|
|
The Vigilante
|
|
13% | |
|
Posted By: Michael Huber
Date Posted: 30 January 2008 at 9:27pm
|

You scored as a Doctor Fate |
| You are DOCTOR FATE: the solemn, driven sorceror pledged to defend all of mankind from the countless unseen, supernatural horrors hell-bent upon its destruction! (1st appearance: MORE FUN COMICS #55, May 1940) |
| Doctor Fate |
|
88% |
| Green Lantern |
|
75% |
| Hawkman |
|
75% |
| The Vigilante |
|
67% |
| The Flash |
|
58% |
| Starman |
|
58% |
| The Sandman. |
|
58% |
| Hourman |
|
46% |
| Johnny Thunder |
|
46% |
| The Guardian |
|
46% |
| The Black Canary |
|
29% | | Pleasantly surprised by this, one of my all time favorite characters!
------------- 'The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'-Ronald Reagan
|
Posted By: Eric Smearman
Date Posted: 30 January 2008 at 9:59pm
|
Picked up Project Superpowers # 0 today. I think I'm gonna like this series. Really looking for ward to the next issue.
To Stephen Sadowski: If you read this; Congratulations on your fine work. Are you doing any more stuff for this book?
|
Posted By: Paul Greer
Date Posted: 30 January 2008 at 10:21pm
I was 92% The Flash. .
-------------
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 30 January 2008 at 11:29pm
Thanks, Eric...no..just the one issue..moved on to Avengers/Invaders. Glad it caught your interest... Sometimes I think all comics should occasionally have these 1 dollar intro or incentive issues. I think it definitely helps people take a chance on a title. So, besides the Art..what did you like about the issue? It obviously piqued your interest for the next one, but...why?
|
Posted By: Victor Rodgers
Date Posted: 31 January 2008 at 6:51am
So did any of you guys read the Twelve #1? What did you think of it?
-------------
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 31 January 2008 at 7:04am
|
Stephen, the art was very good on the newly released "0" issue and the cover price made it even sweeter.
For me, the inaugural issue seemed to offer an effective hook for how & why the golden agers were to be revived. Sadly, for me, this was at the expense of Bruce Carter III (one of my favorites of the old Nedor gang). I hated seeing him duped, if that's what happened, but only time will tell - - - I guess.
I will stick around and see where this goes, but I hope the artwork doesn't suffer with your early departure.
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 31 January 2008 at 4:34pm
|
Though the art previews for LAST DEFENDERS do little or nothing for me (unfortunately, but maybe I need to give it a chance...and yet I can't get over how un-dynamic the Blazing Skull appears; how is it humanly possible for an artist to make the Blazing Skull look, well, mundane?), this is a nice little overview of the character with Joe Casey commentary:
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=145148 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=145148
|
Posted By: Eric Smearman
Date Posted: 31 January 2008 at 5:14pm
|
Stephen - The circumstances of the heroes' disappearance, their impending return and the inner turmoil of Bruce Carter and his role in all of this all adds up to something I think I'm gonna want to read.
I'm disappointed that you're not continuing with this series but I will keep a look out for Avengers / Invaders.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 31 January 2008 at 6:25pm
|
I have yet to read THE TWELVE yet, but I'm starting to feel like I should. JMS is my problem, but maybe this thing is worthwhile.
What's definitely worthwhile is this cover to issue 2, by Kaare Andrews...don't know where I've heard the name. There's a bit of oddness to the cover, but for obvious thematic reasons it appeals to me. I'm not sure about the interior art, really, but I like this:

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 31 January 2008 at 6:27pm
|
I'm confused, Stephen S. You're only doing two issues of the SUPERPOWERS thing? Who's on tap for the others?
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 31 January 2008 at 7:16pm
Chad, I only did the #0 issue.
I believe Carlos Paul is doing the regular series.
You havent given your review of #0, yet, Chad. Of all people I was looking forward to hearing your thoughts most, seeing as you champion this thread and all...
|
Posted By: Victor Rodgers
Date Posted: 01 February 2008 at 5:47am
|
have yet to read THE TWELVE yet, but I'm starting to feel like I should. JMS is my problem, but maybe this thing is worthwhile.
****
Im no great fan of Stracynski, I greatly hate his Spider-Man work. But this was good aside from a line or two that raised an eye brow. Loved most of the designs in the book.
-------------
|
Posted By: Eric Smearman
Date Posted: 01 February 2008 at 5:17pm
|
I read and enjoyed the first issue of The Twelve. If the next couple issues don't disappoint I may be in for the long haul.
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 01 February 2008 at 7:46pm
So...
I just got my issue of SuperPowers 0, and I'm amazed at how bad coloring
can ruin a lot of good work.
I don't think I've ever posted any negative comments before, but I was
just so taken aback at the poor coloring job. It completely overtook the
drawings, and turned the pages into gaudy, overdone messes.
Such a shame.
Doug Klauba is a friend of mine, and I'm so frustrated with Alex Ross for
art-directing such an ugly mess. The whole book has solid art somewhere
in there, but it's been filled in with "look at me, I'm overdone" colors. It
resembles something from Avatar... Was the idea that Ross wanted it to
look painted? Well, that failed.
Wow, I'm so sorry to Doug and Stephen. You guys got hosed. Alex Ross
needs to stick to his own art and not be an art director. My eyes are still
bleeding...
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 02 February 2008 at 7:36am
I agree with you Dave. I just got the book last night so I hadn't been able to comment. We saw the pencils and how good they looked, but the "painted finished product didn't look good at all. Especially disappointing in the two page spread where Samson was painted purple!
I'm afraid the story also didn't make sense, it falls down in the area of the plot vs. the characters and characterization. It's almost the exact same trap that James Robinson's GOLDEN AGE falls into. A big reason that story works is that it conveniently ignores the mystics. While it supposedly has every post-crisis dc golden-age hero in it, there is not Dr. Occult, Dr. Fate, Spectre, Zatarra, etc, because the final battle has to be a physical one. The only really powerful mystic hero is Johnny Thunder and he's denigrated as a character. It's the internal illogic of teaming up Dr. Thirteen with the Phantom Stranger and having him constantly not believe in magic.
The conceit of this story is that pretty much all golden-age characters exist on one earth. However, in the story context characters have trouble believing in the Fighting Yank's story and are all about being rational, when the said group he's talking to includes the Flame and Green Lama whose very backgrounds are in the mystical/philosophical. The Flame and Flame-girl actually have superpowers based on his mystical training. The big invasion we see Phantasmo, Golden Lad, Cat-man, Amazing Man and Man of War, all whose abilities are based on magic. Likewise a few others scattered through the book, and by the conceit of the book we can safely assume even more. The basic dilemma of the issue just doesn't make sense with the characters involved. It felt completely forced.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 02 February 2008 at 5:52pm
|
Sorry Stephen S, I haven't picked mine up yet...wince. I've been in the midst of a little bit of life deluge.
Ed, I think the GOLDEN AGE is not meant to be representative of the DC of the time the series came out or now, even though it's supposedly "in continuity". GOLDEN AGE is very specific about the physicality of the characters involved...all of the Golden Agers in this story are about as "real" as Robinson could get them, right down to their origins. I think in Robinson's mind, he was writing from the conceit that the physical world causes physical reactions and vice versa...so mystic might is never considered a viable possibility in "our" world, or the "real" world. It's not so painfully accepted outside of religion. I don't know how purposeful Robinson's intent in regards to the mystics is, but I don't agree it ruins the story at hand.
The superhuman characters involved, especially those "directly" addressed by the story, are almost all products of science-based incident/accident, GL, Robotman, Hourman, Johnny Quick, Human Bomb, while the non-superhumans are dominant, Red Bee, Tarantula, Manhunter, Ms. America, Liberty Belle, Hawkman. Looking at the story, the arrival of Captain Comet and Dynaman represent a core shift in the balance between superhumans and "extra"humans, as superhumans are about to run rampant in the "new" ideology of the Silver Age. Which, by the by, changes the values of the world around them...before that time, even the superhumans are just men and women standing up for American ideals, and in the post-War environment, they suffer the same indifference that the vets of WW 2 were faced with, once the celebrating and occupacy was over. That's my take on some of these proceedings anyway.
There just doesn't appear to be any mystics involved in this story simply because they, like Superman and Batman, have not come into existence yet. In Robinson's created story, that's the case. I don't know how this is "in continuity" either, but there you go.
For me, GOLDEN AGE isn't about the JSA at all. It's about WW 2 vets who happen to have extraordinary abilities, and the sudden disaffection Robinson's chosen cast feels now that the world has moved on from needing them so poignantly. Considering what has happened to most of these characters since that time, I consider GOLDEN AGE a fanciful variation on them...the noir-infected style of Robinson/Smith telling a tale of an alternate world.
|
Posted By: William Lukash
Date Posted: 02 February 2008 at 7:32pm
|
I thought Project Superpowers was interesting. I thought the Twelve was interesting. Lets see where they go from here.
I'm a big fan of golden age comics, but these new versions aren't anything like the golden age comics. They are entirely new people wearing the same costumes. Nearly every golden age hero could be swapped out with the next one, with excpetions, of course. They are all patriotic, tough, smart, etc. None of them have any failngs. Heck, even Rockman was pretty much the same way.
I guess I'll just have to see where they go, and how the characters are written. If its just Watchmen all over again, then I'll be disappointed. I think thats the direction of the Twelve, but I hope Project Superpowers isn't that way. The Twelve makes me cringe a little. I think its Bendis' "watch-me-shit-on-super-heroes" story.
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 02 February 2008 at 9:57pm
I'll have to say that Chris Weston could draw anything and I'd buy it. I'm a
huge fan of his.
The problem is that I want the deluxe hardcover of things like The
Twelve, so I have no comment on the story for now other then I know I'll
like the art.
Unless the coloring kills it.
I will say that I have a big ol' Doom Patrol commission from Chris Weston,
and getting the art from him was nothing but great. He seems like a cool
guy, and his blog shows off a lot of his fantastic art.
I do hope it's written well, especially for Chris' sake. It seems that the first
issue sold out, so I'm hoping it's well received. I'd hate to put the
hardcover on the "Looks good but the story sucks" shelf...
I so wanted to like the Superpowers book, but I had a feeling it wouldn't
gel with me from the start. The book was launched and announced with
nothing but Alex Ross' name and art, and no sign of any other artists
involved. Look, it's nice to have pretty covers, but there's 20+ pages
inside and only one cover. That makes the interior artists much more
important then the cover artist. To not have any interior art to show when
announcing the book is horrible marketing. Then you add to it the lame
business model of Dyamite hiring big name artists as "Art Directors" so
that they can plaster the A-list name above the actual interior artists...
so incredibly lame...
So I look at SuperPowers, and all I've seen is Ross art and Ross' name
everywhere. His seal of approval as an "Art Director, and it's a total
letdown, mostly due to inappropriate coloring. If they had shown more of
the actual art, I'd know exactly what I was getting. Thank God it was $1,
because I feel like it was bought "sight unseen"...
Baaaaaad marketing...
Maybe one day I'll read issue #0... I doubt I'll buy any more of the issues,
and I'm part of the Golden Age fan target audience.I don't think that
there's really THAT many of us out there...
Oops.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 02 February 2008 at 11:09pm
So, Dave, you didn't even read #0?
Sounds like you had a LOT of preconceptions going into it..Never good.
Well, maybe one day you'll read it, and see it through less clouded eyes..I hope to hear what you think!
Steve
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 03 February 2008 at 12:35pm
Actually, the only preconception I had was that it was going to look good.
When you have "Alex Ross: Art Director" plastered all over it, what should
I expect? You did your job well, Doug did his well. Alex then approved a
colorist that was completely inappropriate for this book, and you guys
got screwed.
I hate to say it, Steve, but I'm an illustrator myself, and I guess a big art
snob. As I've said, I don't have any problems with yours or Doug's
drawings, but those colors completely overtook them and were kinda
offensive to my snobby eyes. The extra amount of "texture"/painterly
style just made it a mess, and the pallette was all over the place. It was
too much, and it looked to me like a younger artist trying to show off-
not realizing that too much is not a good thing. Color should NEVER
distract, unless that's the point of the illustration...
It's also hard to read a comic when I'm too distracted by the thought of
"what could have been" if only Ross had been a decent art-director. The
blame is on him, not the colorist.
To be fair, it's not every page, but there are some where I flip the page
and think "MY EYES, MY POOR EYES!!" ( I will read it soon. I promise!)
Well, that's a bit dramatic, but it does make me a bit sad. Kinda like Lynn
Varley tryng to use the computer in Dark Knight Strikes Again, or even
better- check out the coloring in Superman: Day of Doom. This is my
favorite example of horrible coloring, as Jose Villarrubia's crazy textures
try to overtake Bill Sienkiewicz's already crazy inks in a fight to the death.
The end result is ugly ugly mud. So check it out if you really want to see
some artists get hosed.
Recently, I think that DC's Brave in the Bold is a good example of
overdone coloring. Perez is creating these insane page layouts, full of
detail that are already a bit too much. Tom Smith then comes in and tries
to do digital airbrush on every one of these already insane page layouts,
creating a total mess. Totally over-saturated with color and color detail,
and then the printer comers in and darkens it just enough to put the final
nail in the coffin. After getting the first issue, I called an illustrator friend
of mine to see what he thought, and he blurted out the exact comment
without me having to say anything...
Oh well, that's enough of a Sunday rant for me!
I would love to have a Sadowski Black Terror drawing for my collection,
though. Are you going to any cons this year?
|
Posted By: John Webb
Date Posted: 03 February 2008 at 4:01pm
|
I am a sucker for this kind of book and really enjoyed the first issue. Sure the story is not (so far) hyper new but it is a type of story I like rather a lot.I loved the art and I am crushed that Steve Sadowski is now off the book. For me the colouring was fine. What with the Twelve and Avengers/Invaders the next few months are going to be fun for us fans of old style heroes.
Steve do you know if Dynamite have any plans to release this story in hardcover once it is completed?
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 03 February 2008 at 4:10pm
|
I liked the Zero issue overall, but I agree that the coloring is a bit overdone. I understand that the idea was to emulate an "Alex Ross" project with painterly color, but I don't think that this artist/colorist combo meshes as well as the Braithwaith/Ross team did on Justice. Still, it's only the first issue, so I'll stick around a while just on the strength of some of the characters involved.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 04 February 2008 at 1:11pm
Dave, I cant disagree with some of your thoughts. There were pages I thought were 'overcolored' but you cant lay 'blame' solely on Alex, although he does have final say in most of it. I really enjoyed some of the coloring, and others not so much..
I will say the process will be similar for Avengers/Invaders, but <I> will have a much more hands on approach to the end result..Theres already been some pages colored up and I think it looks great myself ( and I'm PICKY)! I'll be looking forward to hearing what you think!
The 3 cons I hope to attend, are the NYCon in April , the Emerald City ( Seattle Con ) in May, I think..and San Diego inJuly, I think..love to meet you..:)
John,I have no reason to think they wouldn't eventually release a collection, but hardcover I dont know about...
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 05 February 2008 at 1:21am
|
Stephen Sadowski, I must say, I found it interesting how you stuck to Alex's general layout on the two-page spread, but you chose to add or emphasize different figures than he did. Also, thanks for including Magno in there, he's one of my faves!
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 05 February 2008 at 8:20am
Seems only right such a story would have Magno in it. In a story that
encompasses all the public domain comic characters of the time, you'd
expect to see the big guns from each company and Magno was probably
the most successful of the Ace group as little known as he is today. I'd
like to have seen him take the place of one of the Fox characters actually,
did we need Blue Beetle, the Flame and Samson figuring prominently?
Makes you wonder what poor Green Mask did to get completely ignored.
Seemed a little strange not to see Doc Strange even in a cameo when so
many of the other lesser known Nedor heroes showed up for at least a
panel. Still, just a first issue, so there's always hope for them. And for
more Magno.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 05 February 2008 at 9:58am
|
Green Mask...at least the second version, has a pretty cool little conceit going:
After a two year break (post Green Mask I), Fox Features revived the character of the Green Mask in issue #10 of The Green Mask . In this version, the Green Mask was now secretly Johnny Green, the son of the original Green Mask, whose secret identity had now been changed to Walter Green. Johnny was a teenager who would become an adult when he was very angry. (like Captain Marvel / Hulk cross; but no magic words required) When he's anger sub-sided, he'd change back to plain Johnny Green.
Too bad this character got short shrift. When I was a kid, that's EXACTLY what I wanted to do when I got mad...become an adult and kick ass.
EDIT forgot to add this is from the GREAT site, The Golden Age Hero Directory, http://www.dpccomics.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/theamericanco micshop/goldenagedatabase/index.php?page=4§ion= g - http://www.dpccomics.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/theamericancomicsh op/goldenagedatabase/index.php?page=4§ion=g
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 05 February 2008 at 11:48am
The problem I have with that site, quite a bit of it's plagiarized, many
descriptions are lifted verbatim from other sites (most notably Jess
Nevins), just as those micros probably came from some other sites
without a single citation of the original sources. Then there are errors,
such as he has the Invaders retcon hero Spirit of '76 as an actual golden-
age character (confusing it with another character with the same name?)
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 05 February 2008 at 8:52pm
|
Oh...eesh. Sorry Ed. I notice a lot of that sort of thing, but I was thinking the originators of the pieces and parts were somehow acknowledged. That's disappointing. What you get from the Internet I guess...I wish to god Roy Thomas would put old issues of "Alter Ego" online.
Ed! In your opinion, and including your own excellent site, what's the best sites to check up/out the Golden Agers?
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 05 February 2008 at 8:54pm
|
Ray Tate writes up a review for http://www.comicsbulletin.com/reviews/ - http://www.comicsbulletin.com/reviews/ on PROJECT SUPERPOWERS:
Something is seriously wrong with the DC universe. I know I say that often enough, but you have to realize, gentle reader, that I am a DC fan. I grew up reading DC. I have DC in my blood.
I care so little about DC nowadays. Here I sit. I'm reading a book about a series of basically also-ran, public domain characters called Project Superpowers. These individuals should feel generic to me. They should be like the cookie-cutter police inspectors from '90s British mystery series that were aired on PBS, absolutely indistinguishable and interchangeable. Thanks to Ross, Kreuger, Kluba and Sadowski these super-heroes resonate more for me than the current Batman, Superman or Wonder Woman.
Something is wrong with DC. The problem lies in the writers having no reverence for these characters. They either want to bring them down to give them feet of clay, turn them into jokes or use them as examples of what's old contrasting against what's hip--usually written by Winniruckajohns.
The story opens with the eerie American Spirit (Uncle Sam), presented as a vaguely human shape beneath the flag, confronting Bruce Carter, alias the Fighting Yank, with an accusation. Already, the story is different. Rather than light against dark, we have two patriotic archetypes conflicting. The American Spirit takes the Yank down memory lane. Memory Lane is currently inhabited by the Black Terror, the Flame, the Green Lama and the original Blue Beetle.
I like to delve into the history of super-hero comics. Alter-Ego is on my pull list, but I've not read an adventure with these heroes. I know of them. I have seen them before as art, mascoting the articles written about them, but I don't know these individuals like I do the Trinity.
Thanks to the creative team on Project Superpowers I now like these individuals more than any member of the Shadowmatesocietyofamericantitans. I think I may like them more so than the current Justice League. Let me reiterate. There's something wrong with the DC universe. There has to be.
Kluba and Sadowski depict these heroes in classic poses. Black Terror stands with his arms akimbo. The armored Beetle gleams in the background. Capes flow and flap. At the same time Ross and Krueger injects complexity within the heroes that serves as the crux of the story. The Yank believes in supernatural evil that must be fought at all cost. The other heroes see rationality as the way to fight. They do not necessarily believe in evil as a force but dependent on the individual.
The military, or the powers behind the military, dupe the Yank into serving their corrupt ways. The yarn the general spools could only instigate action in a blind believer. Ostensibly, the Yank is the villain of the piece, but Ross and Krueger make you sympathize with the character. He's doing what he believes to be right, and under the advisement of his ghostly ancestor. He has literally seen the evil around the world; no doubt part of the long con. The artifact the Yank steals from Hitler's cache does exhibit mystical abilities. So I can see his point of view. That's when I realized that I'm feeling something for a character that I didn't know in my childhood, and I'm feeling something for a character who is essentially an artfully corrupted hero, archetypes for which I usually have no use.
The strange thing about is Project Superpowers is that I didn't just feel something for one character. I felt something for all of them. I never read a single adventure with the Flame and Flame Girl, yet I find him potent and she sweet and caring. I know that the original Daredevil was supposed to be hot stuff back in the day, but I never had the opportunity to read a single story with him in it, yet damned if he doesn't look and act cool in these pages. If the Checkteeninfinitypackofjustice went away tomorrow I wouldn't care, but Samson's fate affected me. If Booster Gold were drawn, quartered and disemboweled, I'd shed few tears. Why then does it matter to me if the lives of Kitten, Miss Masque and the Red Arrow are threatened? It's in the writing. It's in the art. These characters may be also-rans to Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman, but the individuals involved with the series love them. They revere them. They treat them with respect, and each character's dignity emanates from the panels. Why can't the powers that be at DC and Marvel do the same?
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 06 February 2008 at 10:09am
My favorite places to visit in regards to golden-age characters:
Micros:
http://www.geocities.com/copperagecomics/index.html - http://www.geocities.com/copperagecomics/index.html
http://ca.geocities.com/micro_heroes@rogers.com/ - http://ca.geocities.com/micro_heroes@rogers.com/
discussing golden-age comics:
http://www.comicboards.com/gsmb/ - Gold/Silver/Bronze-Ages Board
History:
http://www.toonopedia.com/ - Toonopedia There's a lot of
stuff beyond just golden-age comicbook characters, but it's a great place
to give you a historical perspective. He goes beyond just the history of
characters but also gives context.
http://blaklion.best.vwh.net/comics.html - Mikel Midnight's site It's been a longwhile since updated but contains some great lists and
timelines of various continuity universes.
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/7160/annos.html - Jess Nevins sites scroll past the various annotations he's done for books
and you'll see some wonderful links to his sites including his Golden-Age
Directory and his one with essays devoted to the Timely heroes. Do a
little more searching through his sites, and you should also find links to
his Victorian characters pages and his Pulp heroes pages.
He's devoted most of his time the last few years to actually getting these
in print, that the sites themselves have not been updated in some time.
It's why I started putting out pages devoted to the Golden-age heroes. I
was coming across new heroes and/or new information as reading the
stories contradicts some of the secondary sources that he was dependent
on, mainly Jeff Rovin's Superhero Encyclopedia book which contains a few
errors that have made it into several sites. So, I hope that my pages will
fill in those gaps.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 06 February 2008 at 10:20pm
|
Awesome, Ed. Thanks so much.
Finally got my PROJECT SUPERPOWERS Zero today. Also THE TWELVE two. Will report tomorrow.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 07 February 2008 at 9:08am
Looks like the return of another GA hero. I remember the series by Dixon
in the 80s being pretty good though it was at a time when I was in college
and didn't have muc disposable income for comics. Little pet peeve, the
ad is completely misleading. Airboy was not the original hero of the skies,
even in comics, there were plenty of aviator heroes before him. And while
Chuck Dixon did write the series for Eclipse in the 80s and can be
technically credited as creating the legacy character and the modern
versions of the various other characters, this would give the idea that he
created the whole concept.
Prompts me for a question, I know Chuck is on these boards occassionally
and he might know the answer, are the Hillman characters in general
public domain? I know that his version of the charactes are not, but i
always wondered whether Dixon or Eclipse had bought the characters or
just took advantage of defunct copyrights and trademarks ala
SUPERPOWERS.

-------------
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 07 February 2008 at 12:13pm
I picked SUPERPOWERS #0 up earlier today, but I haven't had a chance to read it yet. I probably won't have time to get to the comics I picked up until sometime tonight, and I really want to read it and Captain America #34.
Chuck Dixon doing Airboy? Awesome. Hope he uses the Heap, or someone else does, eventually.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 07 February 2008 at 7:35pm
|
Heap action! That's what I'm talking about!
SUPERPOWERS Zero: I'm not sure what I was expecting, but I wasn't expecting as poignant a story as I found here. Really, really interesting concept, but I was riveted by the Fighting Yank's decisions, considering he is the true "soldier" who believes intently in the power of the preternatural, the palpable obscure. The idea that "sacrifice" is such an obscure concept even at that time that the Yank is SURE he must betray his friends to save existence...pretty powerful.
The whole series gets a nice little set-up, and Steve Sadowski pulls off some wowser panels, such as the first appearance of the American Spirit, the Face's face melting, Samson's leap and "I'll stop this"...really well-done. A fantastic job all around, and I'm not just saying it. I would even say, tonally, that Jim Krueger gets to the heart of these obscure characters with a few deft manuevers...he isn't telling you what to think about any of the characters, but allowing the reader to latch on to the character based on their actions. It's good story-telling, not a treatise on deconstruction. I was most surprised about that aspect of this story.
As far as anything else is concerned, I didn't think the coloring looked any worse than on anything else I read currently. Most comics look like if you tilted them the color would slide off that slick-ass paper onto your shoes. I would always prefer the color when it doesn't look oily, but you can't get it all.
I was a trifle worried about SUPERPOWERS, only because I hoped it would be something worthwhile. And I'm pretty excited now.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 07 February 2008 at 8:04pm
Yay, Chad. Glad you liked..To be fair to Doug Klauba, I only did the 'flashback' stuff..he did the opening and closing pages. His stuff IS great, isnt it? I believe he and Alex went to the same school. <shrug> I hope you will follow us over to Avengers/Invaders..more Golden Age goodness!
Steve
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 07 February 2008 at 8:33pm
|

Hadn't seen this cover before to post...I still think Ross is putting some real effort into these things. Probably some of the best work he's done in a long time, to me.
|
Posted By: Eric Smearman
Date Posted: 07 February 2008 at 8:35pm
|
Stephen- It wasn't until my second or third reading of the book that I noticed that the framing sequence wasn't you. Doug Klauba is indeed good and your styles meshed pretty well together, IMO.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 07 February 2008 at 9:01pm
|
Stephen, what has Carlos Paul been involved on? Any place online to check out the man's art?
Sorry about the Klauba reference, but it was a nice panel. Ross looks like he's got a specific "look" he's shooting for. So you and Klauba seem seamless, or maybe I was just too excited to notice. Plus, I figured Klauba was maybe the inker...I'm not familiar with him.
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 07 February 2008 at 10:53pm
|
Well, I finally managed to read it, and I've got to say I'm sorry Stephen isn't doing the art for the rest of it. The artwork is really good - Stephen, you really hit it out of the park with the two page spread (pages 18-19), and Dynamite should really consider making that into a poster or something. I recognize almost every character, but there's one I'm not so sure about - is the blond haired guy with red metallic skin supposed to be Man O' Metal with different coloring (he was originaly black haired with blue metal skin)?
The writing is really well done, and I like how Fighting Yank was set up to be the catalyst for everything.
Will definitely be picking up Avengers/Invaders, since I'm a fan of the real Invaders (ie, WW2) team.
-------------
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 07 February 2008 at 11:48pm
Doug is a great guy and a great illustrator. I've gotten to know him over the years of hanging in artist alley at WizardWorld Chicago (like Alex Ross, Doug's in the Chicago area) and I love seeing his actual paintings up close. Most of Dougs comic work has been covers for Moonstone (Phantom, Kolchak,Spider).
This is my favorite of Doug's- it's a print he did that I'm happy to have in my collection...
|
Posted By: Eric Smearman
Date Posted: 07 February 2008 at 11:53pm
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 08 February 2008 at 5:04am
Again, thanks guys.. it was a very fun project..I can absolutely guarantee everyone involved was very much enjoying it. I would chat with Alex at length about these guys..the guy just LOVES this stuff. Chad, I havent seen ANYTHING of Carlos' Art.
Brian, that was Fearless Flint, not Man o' Metal. I had to check that they weren't the same guy too! Just for fun, here is the complete list of characters I had to choose from, when not listed in script:
Lady Satan The Eagle and Buddy Fearless Flint Power Man Magno and Davey Man o' Metal Boy King and Giant Rainboy Boy Airman Radior Man of War The Flame Flame Girl Blue Beetle ( Scarab/ Big Blue) and Sparky Samson and David V-Man and the V-Boys The Green Mask and Domino U.S. Jones Blue Bolt Sub Zero Man Captain Battle and Captain Battle Jr. Daredevil The Black Owl Yank and Doodle Sparkman Doc Strange The Dart and Ace American Crusader American Eagle Skyman Mr Face Marvelo Captain Courageous The Super-American Black Terror and Tim Amazing Man The Arrow Vulcan PyroMan The Liberator "Flash" Lightning and Lightning Girl The Raven Unknown Soldier The Sword The Flag Green Lama Cyclone Grim Reaper Yellowjacket Black Venus The Hood RocketMan and RocketGirl HydroMan Fighting Yank Silver Streak Captain Future The Woman in Red TheTarget and the Targeteers Cat Man and Kitten The Owl Strongman Major Victory Dynamic Man and Dynamic Boy The Green Giant Phantasmo The Claw
I only hope that when( if ) it ever gets collected the PAGES and pages
of Alex's sketches for all these characters get printed... Any fan of
these characters will get a great joy from seeing his take on
them..just beautiful! <edited to add:>
Wouldnt it be cool to see JBs take on ANY of these??
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 08 February 2008 at 10:08am
That's a great list. A few I really only know by name only. Radior is
completely new to me and not too much to be found about him online
anywhere.

-------------
|
Posted By: Simon Bowland
Date Posted: 08 February 2008 at 1:49pm
|
I've already turned in Superpowers #1 - Carlos Paul's artwork is good, but he steps it up another gear with issue #2.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 08 February 2008 at 5:39pm
|
Unknown Soldier?
Not this guy, I presume...
???
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 08 February 2008 at 5:45pm
|
Dave, NOW I know where I saw Klauba's name before...I'm embarrassed because I was just using one of his great Phantom illustrations for an avatar. I'm suffering from dumb:

|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 08 February 2008 at 5:49pm
  
The Unknown Soldier is this guy (the 3 main variations of his costume). He was one of Ace's generic heroes. No real background given, self described as the spirit of the boys who died to ensure that America will endure. He would show up when needed, had the general powers of flight, strength and carries a gun that uses exploding bullets. Ace is the company that also provided heroes Magno, Vulcan, Captain Courageous, the Sword, Lash Lightning.
-------------
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 08 February 2008 at 7:12pm
|
I'd like to see someone use the Purple Zombie, a very obscure Golden Age character who only ever made one appearance. Haven't found any pictures of him online, other than micro-heroes. Basically, a bald guy with a mean look on his face, purple skin, brown (I think) pants and shoes.
-------------
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 08 February 2008 at 9:33pm
yeah, Chad, I was surprised that you of all people weren't aware of Doug's
stuff!
Heck, if your aware of my crap, you've got to know Doug's!
BTW, the Avenger art was finished early last month. No clue if anyone will
like it, as it's a combo of my drawings with Andy Bennett's inks, but it was
kinda fun. I'll see when I can show anyone some of the art. Kinda strange
that I'm one of the first artists to draw The Avenger since Kyle Baker in
the 80's...
Anyway, it'll probably be the last comic industry stuff I'll be doing for a
looong time. I have three covers coming out for a Kolchak mini series,
but they were finished a year ago. After that, I'll more then likely be
disappearing from comics. Still have alot of the Zombies game art coming
out this year, so I guess that's swell...
not that anyone asked...
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 09 February 2008 at 7:53am
The Avenger always struck me as one of the few pulp heroes that should translate well to comics, yet he rarely has. One of my favorite comic stories to pull out and re-read is an issue of the 70's Shadow run where he and the Avenger team-up, a pure fun single issue story.
Right now, Moonstone strikes me as the one publisher that is writing comics almost solely for me and with interesting stuff coming up: Airboy, Captain Action, Avenger, Doc Savage, the Domino Lady. If they made all of those monthly comics and affordable, I'd be getting more stuff from them each month than any other publisher.
-------------
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 09 February 2008 at 2:53pm
Hey Ed-
The problem is that Moonstone can't afford to make the comics affordable
or monthly. There's just not enough people like you to support the market
for these characters.
Unless you have someone A-list backing the books, then maybe you have a
chance...
Then you get into the whole baloney of Dynamite trying to have A-list
artists "art direct" the books in a desperate attempt to get more readers...
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 09 February 2008 at 3:47pm
|
I won't pretend to know Erik Larsen's mind, but whatever his true motivations, he seems geniunely proud of his Next Issue Project, discussed in interview here:
http://www.comicbookresources.com/columns/?column=20 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/columns/?column=20
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 09 February 2008 at 4:05pm
|
Dave, Klauba is one of those guys, like yourself, I've only recently discovered specifically because Moonstone is out there heralding these characters.
Ed, I've never understood the lack of heat on the Avenger either. Jack Kirby's JUSTICE INC with Denny O'Neil scripts was pretty good stuff (Kirby had some fun too...the panel in one ish where the Avenger has manipulated his "dead, putty face" into a duplicate of another man, and is discovered and subsequently gets a punch in the face...the huge indenture in the Avenger's face from the blow is creepy and fantastic).

I'd die to write the Avenger and Justice Inc. The great part of this character, maybe more than any other Pulp Hero, would be the breadth and scope of the stories you could tell. SF to espionage to horror to jungle adventure would all be readily acceptible. Even the team members of Justice Inc have the kind of backgrounds that could make them as viable and interesting as any of the vampire hunters in TOMB OF DRACULA.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 09 February 2008 at 5:56pm
|
Steranko does the Spider, or, How Did I Manage to Miss This?

|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 09 February 2008 at 9:23pm
Dave, Alex did MUCH more than simply 'art direct'. He was keenly involved in the story and general direction as well. And since when has has using "A LIST" names attached to a project to gain readers been 'baloney'? If so, theres a LOT of baloney sammiches out there!! ;)
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 09 February 2008 at 9:23pm
Chad-
I'll make a call to Joe at Moonstone for you, but only if I get to film your
death and put it on youtube...
Do you go to WizardWorld Chicago? I'm sure the Moonstone folks would
love to meet you. The Avenger is one of Joe Gentile's favorites.
I think it's funny how those two character's actual look is gone from the
two images you've posted. The Spider was soooo not a Shadow wannabe
(what with the fans, hump-back and crazy wig), and the Avenger is kinda
thin with a tiny-ass bent tube gun (not a beefy Kirby man with a colt .45,
but pretty cool anyway).
All of this makes it hard to know what to draw. What's in the text, or what
was drawn before? I barely read any of these stories, but I love the
visuals...
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 10 February 2008 at 7:28am
That's a neat Spider volume. The only thing really marring it (in my eyes) is that all the stories chosen have been reprinted before. There's a new one coming out as well, looking forward to it. (Likewise, there's supposed to be a Ka-Zar pulp volume coming out, collecting all of his stories, I have 2 of the 3 already, one of which being reprinted just this past year).
My impression of the Avenger was that he seemed to get more super as the novels progressed, becoming more like Doc Savage in terms of expertise and ability while remaining a young man. Least until the short-stories, in which all of his aides but Nellie were ignored and she was turned more into a girlfriend role, think radio's Shadow & Margo Lane.
I don't have any qualms with Steranko's handling of the Spider in that it's in keeping with how the Spider looked on the pulp covers. When I read my first Spider story, I was surprised to find out just how different he was often portrayed inside. Of course that was a bit inconsistant as well. There are novels where Richard Wentworth only uses a mask or even operates just as himself, leaving no witnesses and the brand of the Spider to mark his handiwork. And sometimes the costume just seems minus the hump. I tend to see the character as being fairly close to what the recent statue put out looks like.
-------------
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 10 February 2008 at 12:23pm
Thanks Ed! I love hearing abut the stories, as I'm never gonna read them
myself.
what with being illiterate and all...
I just love them purty pitchures...
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 10 February 2008 at 6:06pm
|
Chad- I'll make a call to Joe at Moonstone for you, but only if I get to film your death and put it on youtube...
So it's scribe of The Avenger via J-Horror immolation, Dave?
The funny thing about the Kirby Avenger is that, within the story, the Avenger is slender and does use the little tube gun to "crease skulls".
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 11 February 2008 at 9:22am
|
Bruce Timm rendition of the Avenger...

|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 11 February 2008 at 12:21pm
Looks like Kirk Douglas
-------------
|
Posted By: John Young
Date Posted: 11 February 2008 at 1:04pm
|
Ed Love , I was thinking the same thing before I got to your post.
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 11 February 2008 at 3:50pm
Here's a small chunk of one of mine...
|
Posted By: Bob Simko
Date Posted: 11 February 2008 at 4:18pm
|
If you look, it seems that Kirk Douglas was the "model" for the character on a number of the old pulp novel covers.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 11 February 2008 at 7:52pm
The guy that modeled for the paperback covers, where the gray uniform comes from was Steve Holland, the model for the Bama's (and others') covers for the bantam reprints of Doc Savage. He's also been the model for some Spider reprints, the Executioner, and starred in a 50's series of Flash Gordon.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 11 February 2008 at 7:52pm
|
I wonder if Kirk Douglas would have been willing to dye his hair white and wear white face make-up for such a role...certainly, by the 1970s, we might have gotten the Kirk Douglas Avenger. I mean, if he played a living Wile E. Coyote in that cowboy comedy with Arnold Swartzenegger (sic), he would have been willing to maybe create a lasting character on film while not totally turning in his pride.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 11 February 2008 at 8:12pm
|
Steve Holland was a Man. You just find faces like his so very rarely...

|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 17 February 2008 at 11:03am
|
I didn't think this needed a whole thread, but thought it worth noting that the Phantom debuted on this day in 1936.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 18 February 2008 at 5:55pm
|
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=147169 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=147169
More information on the new FLASH GORDON comic from Ardden, plus the announcement of JM DeMatteis as EIC of the company.

|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 18 February 2008 at 6:46pm
Pretty much as soon as I saw the words of re-imagining and new origin, I knew this wasn't the book for me. Why yet another origin? Isn't it bad enough we get that on the sci-fi channel series? Just recap the origin and status quo and start telling new stories with the actual character. Nine times out of ten, the new "origin" and story doesn't take and dilutes the core concept and integrity of the characters.
-------------
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 18 February 2008 at 9:28pm
Just found out Project Superpowers was #4 on the charts this month!
Pretty cool!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 20 February 2008 at 8:34pm
|
Wanted to post the last two "retro-Pulp" covers of this series, which I haven't run across the first issue of yet. Anyone read it or seen it or heard anything?


|
Posted By: Martin Arlt
Date Posted: 20 February 2008 at 9:09pm
|
Anyone here check out the first issue of Image's Next Issue project. Basically, it takes Golden Age, public domain titles and publishes the next issue of the title. The first one is Fantastic Comics #24. It's golden age sized, 64 pages (including browing pages!), and features a number of stories. There's some nice stuff in there, and it's a lot of fun. The only thing that threw me off for a moment was the fact that it's as if the title had been on hiatus for 60 years, so its "publication date" is 2007-8. So these Golden Age-style (mostly) stories take place now, not in the Golden Age. Despite that, I think it's a fun ride.
Martin Arlt............................
|
Posted By: Michael Myers
Date Posted: 20 February 2008 at 10:38pm
Fists, Guns, and Goggles!
'Love the new thread title...
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 21 February 2008 at 6:04pm
|
Thanks Michael. Inspired by our own Ed Love.
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 22 February 2008 at 3:36am
|
If I remember correctly, The Revenant was a comic Shannon Eric Denton did at Komikwerks for a while, and I believe the character's name was originally the Spook, but was changed fairly soon after the strip started (wonder if DC threatened to sue due to that being the name of a (now deceased) Batman villain?).
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 23 February 2008 at 2:39pm
|
Heard about this bit of retro story-telling, nearly picked it up yesterday but held off...it's a one-shot of IMMORTAL IRON FIST called "Orson Randall and the Green Mist of Death", with art by Nick Dragotta and Mike Allred, concerning a character who is the "Golden Age Iron Fist".

I was running into one of "those" situations where money was tight, but I'll be getting it. Not nuts about the Russ Heath Western portion (coloring like candy), which would have looked so much better in black and white. Anyway, I wish the whole thing just had Dragotta and the Allreds, but they only handle one "chapter".

|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 23 February 2008 at 3:25pm
The Prince of Orphans pursuing him is John Aman which was the civilian name of Amazing Man whose origin Iron Fist cribbed heavily from.
-------------
|
Posted By: Joe Zhang
Date Posted: 23 February 2008 at 6:08pm
|
That Iron Fist page looks pretty kickin'.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 24 February 2008 at 2:33pm
|
You know, I missed out on the whole AGENTS OF ATLAS thing when it first came out...I feared, irrationally, that this was another example of Marvel playing around and turning some good characters into fecal representatives...plus, the exclusion of the 3D Man (even owning up to the fact that he's a retro-character instead of an actual Golden Ager), pissed me off.
However, I'd heard some good things and Leonard Kirk IS a man, so I thought I'd check it out.
Really, really fun. And I can even show the panel that changed my mind, that I saw online prior to buying the hardcover of this collection. This panel may be one of three or four coolest things I've ever seen:

I mean, come on now. That's insanely cool.
Marvel "Boy", Namora, Venus, the Human Robot, and Jimmy Woo along with the marvelously entertaining Gorilla Man play out what I've read of the series so far, and each one is given rousing, brilliant moments to shine.
Again, I can't help wanting to kick over a child's crib for the 3D Man not getting a shot at this kind of love, but you can't have everything I suppose.
Check it out if you haven't:

|
Posted By: Paulo Pereira
Date Posted: 24 February 2008 at 4:00pm
Cool thread. And that ape is cool but so is that Bruce Timm drawing higher up.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 7:12pm
|
I found a neat little round robin with a bunch of writers who were involved with Moonstone's SPIDER CHRONICLES, including Chuck Dixon, Ann Nocenti, Steve Englehart, and John Jakes. Kind of interesting, for Spider fans, and populated with awesome Tom Floyd illustrations:
http://www.comicon.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_t opic;f=36;t=005886;p=0 - http://www.comicon.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic; f=36;t=005886;p=0

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 4:13pm
|
Preview of SUPERPOWERS Ish 1:
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=148164 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=148164
I'm not sure how to feel about Carlos Paul yet, but there's a decent action page given representation...

|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 27 February 2008 at 12:37am
Different pages at comicbookresources.com. Ok, trapped in the urn for all that time and the Black Terror somehow was able to get a new costume?
I also liked this quote:
This powerful series is overseen by Alex Ross who has designed every
hero within these pages; scripted by Jim Krueger with art by Carlos
Paul, this is the most powerful comic book event of the year!
Excuse me? Tweaking the Black Terror's costume, does not constitute designing the hero. The basic original design is still there. And frankly, looking at the changes, I cannot say any of them are necessarily an improvement on the originals, they're just different.
-------------
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 27 February 2008 at 12:40am
Do you like how Dynamite ends every sentence in their descriptions with an exclamation point!
Cuz it's all that important!
I like milk and cookies!
My dog has fleas!
2+2=4!
meh.
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 27 February 2008 at 6:13am
|
Excuse me? Tweaking the Black Terror's costume, does not constitute designing the hero. The basic original design is still there. And frankly, looking at the changes, I cannot say any of them are necessarily an improvement on the originals, they're just different.
What you said, ED!
Ross can make some oldstyle characters look a little bit better with his various design tweaks, but in too many instances he's getting "credit" for just the very slightest of alterations. But what can even one guy do, who is apparently so busy "powerfully overseeing" someone else's work.
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 27 February 2008 at 6:59pm
|
The other project Ross is involved in: http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=13159 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=13159
AVENGERS/INVADERS...a two-page spread and a third page to check out. Union Jack, babe!
Thankfully, Steve Sadowski seems to be The Man on this series, and I'm happy about that.

|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 27 February 2008 at 7:35pm
Thanks Chad!!
I posted the full version of the spread here: http://www.comicbloc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=61916
Also, the color you see isn't at 100%. We know Bucky's colors are wrong. ;)
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 29 February 2008 at 4:07pm
Well, I just got the Image Next Issue Project book, and it's pretty cool.
I have yet to sit down and read it, but I would like to say that my initial thoughts are that mixing the "color" of the paper from aged newsprint to bright white was a horrible mistake.
it makes the book fall apart as a complete package, and is very jarring to the eye. I found myself thinking of Gremlins "BRIGHT WHITE! BRIGHT WHITE!" ARRRRGH!
It has such nice production that it's a shame to have such a lame mistake. The white pages should have been toned to a sublte newsprint, at least, to make the book feel like a complete entity.
I would haved followed that up with using the paper stock from the New Gods collection. It would have made the gimmick a litte more coherent and successful. I would have then stuck to either an aged look, or a new look- but not both.
Any way, I'm looking forward to reading it. Loved the idea. Loved most of the art. Loved the love that was put into it.
But, man, what a glaring mistake on the production side, making the "aged" gimmick/tribute/homage(?) fall flat on it's ass...
But, hey, I'm picky like that.
On another note, I would like to say the the Fletcher Hanks book from Fantagraphics is freakin' awesome! Cover to cover fantastic! All costumes designed by Alex Ross!
oh, wait...
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 09 March 2008 at 1:19pm
|
I read PROJECT SUPERPOWERS ish 1 and THE TWELVE ish 3.
SUPERPOWERS reads like an outline. Green Lama gets a few good bits, thankfully, but the turnaround of faith from the Zero Ish to this one troubles me. Black Terror comes off bizarrely lacking consistency, and it is odd to see him appear in "new Alex Ross design" straight out of the "bottle". Why not allow him to tweak his costume himself? Plus the pacing is all over the place, and Dynamic Man's superhuman utopia is barely fleshed out enough to wonder about the world in which it exists. Maybe that's my issue: I can't figure out what kind of world these characters are living in. The Watchmen-lite is now officially confusing me.
TWELVE is something I knew would end up choked to death by JMS's obsession with his navel. Crying, moaning, and disenfranchised, the "heroes" are plodding through their new lives in the present but, for one thing, there's too many characters to care about. Fiery Mask at least does one little panel of action in this "thrilling" chapter. Laughing Mask would be creepy and cool if he was actually doing what he's flashing back to doing. Again, the pacing is Henry James speed and it's murderously slow.
A huge opportunity is being missed here. Luckily, almost all of these characters ARE in the public domain, so even if Ross and JMS are screwing up their conceits, somebody else can come along and write Black Terror or Daredevil or Fiery Mask based on the original concept and develop them properly.
At least I hope so! Shit!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 10 March 2008 at 4:17pm
|
Christopher Mills, a good writer in his own right, goes in depth into this book on his blog, http://atomic-pulp.blogspot.com/ - http://atomic-pulp.blogspot.com/ , and he's a cat who loves this sort of thing.

Anybody read this? I picked it up but didn't pull the trigger a while back and am now officially regretting it (as I always do...it's a shame to be poor!)
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 11 March 2008 at 7:54am
I enjoyed IRON GHOST. A different take on The Shadow type of pulp
character. I don't know if I'd want to read an ongoing with the concept,
but perfect for a mini-series or two.
As far as I know, none of THE TWELVE are in public domain, providing
Timely/Atlas/Marvel renewed their copyrights. THE TWELVE does suffer
from inconsistancies in narration and story structure. The main problem I
have with the pacing is there's a bit too much of telling us things instead
of actually showing us. Such as in issue #1 we have Phantom Reporter
through narration telling us how good and capable the heroes are while
the art shows them walking across empty rooms and down a flight of
stairs. In issue #3, most of the action is via flashback and even then
there's very little of it on-camera. It's as if JMS and Weston are trying to
save $$ on the special effects budget. The character moments are
powerful, but so far that's all there is and thanks to the climax of issue 1
and the opening page of issue 2 we know there's more to the story but
it's not touched on at all. It needs to go back to the writer and have him
work on the structure and shuffle some scenes around so that we have
both the main plot and character bits and flashbacks. ie, it really should
mimic THE WATCHMEN story structure more
-------------
|
Posted By: Aric Shapiro
Date Posted: 11 March 2008 at 8:00am
|
Regarding that Avengers/Invaders art, is that supposed to be Namor? I liked the art but the colors seem strange. Thought Namor had black hair...He looks like a carrot top
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 11 March 2008 at 8:16am
|
I think the scan I put up hasn't had the coloring completely corrected, I think according to Steve Sadowski. Should be fixed by showtime.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 11 March 2008 at 11:46am
Actually the hair color is VERY deliberate. In Namors earliest appearances, he had red/auburn hair, and thats what we're going with. I was a little weird about it at first, but now I really like it..makes him feel different and younger.
The Modern Age Namor will have the black hair.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 13 March 2008 at 5:29pm
|
Dynamite has the rights to Buck Rogers. http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=149932 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=149932

I guess half the battle is already won, as the name alone means you've got a mythology in place. That said, I don't think I can remember reading the strip or any comics version...it's all about the Gil Gerard.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 13 March 2008 at 5:33pm
|
THE PHANTOM from Moonstone Books, a preview of the latest issue. Looks good. http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=13345 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=13345
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 13 March 2008 at 6:16pm
|
Christopher Mills adjoining site, http://gunsinthegutters.blogspot.com/ - http://gunsinthegutters.blogspot.com/ is where I found something I didn't know existed. This is WAY too cool not to mention here:

http://gunsinthegutters.blogspot.com/2008/01/gil-kanes-savag e.html#links - http://gunsinthegutters.blogspot.com/2008/01/gil-kanes-savag e.html#links
Looks like Race Bannon and Doc Savage fused into one dude.
|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 13 March 2008 at 6:18pm
Posted By: Steve Ogden
Date Posted: 13 March 2008 at 6:47pm
Chad, here is the original printing.
|
Posted By: Hunter McFalls
Date Posted: 13 March 2008 at 6:55pm
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 13 March 2008 at 7:11pm
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 15 March 2008 at 8:56am
|
Chris Mills scanned a short story from a benefit mag, 
Oh what could have been...


|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 15 March 2008 at 8:57am
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 15 March 2008 at 9:06am
Actually the hair color is VERY deliberate. In Namors earliest appearances, he
had red/auburn hair, and thats what we're going with. I was a little weird
about it at first, but now I really like it..makes him feel different and
younger.
---
Did you put him in the orange trunks as well?
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 15 March 2008 at 1:30pm
Hmm..I'm not sure about the coloring of the shorts, Wallace. I know coloring on them varied a bit as well.
I know its got stripes on the side vs. the more familiar scales. I'm using the 'draw them as black with colored highlights' approach.
What color do you like, or think works best?
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 15 March 2008 at 5:00pm
|
Addressing the hair thing:

I was looking at this and liked the trunks, a navy with a red belt and an S on the buckle. That's cool.

Cover by a cat named Joe Maneely. That's a great Namor!
|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 15 March 2008 at 5:18pm
Thanks, Stephen. I prefer the current, black-haired Sub-Mariner in green
trunks, and the younger, lighter-haired version in the orange trunks. The
black suit Namor wore for a while is visually interesting, but I didn't really
care for it. In my opinion, the Sub-Mariner and Hulk should be of a like
mind when it comes to those sorts of outfits; they're for protection and/or
modesty, neither of which is a concern for two such powerful beings. (I also
prefer Namor without the heavy metal wrist bands. They don't make much
sense on a swimmer.)
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 17 March 2008 at 3:17pm
|
I love James Robinson. I know many won't agree, but the man can write.
His newest project, JUSTICE LEAGUE, is discussed here http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=150409 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=150409
That's not the big news pertaining to this thread. What is, is this:
“This was a character that Dan, Eddie [Berganza, editor] and everyone else stopped cold when I suggested him (and Geoff [Johns] was appalled). I didn’t let up, and they and finally said, “Okay, we trust you James, if you’re that passionate about the character, then use him.” And then, after reading the pages devoted to him in the first issue, they’ve all told me that I was able to make them care about him. He’ll be the oldest character in the book – he’s 90 years old, his human body has been destroyed, and he’s trapped in the body of a gigantic, magic, golden gorilla. Congorilla will be on the team.
“I guarantee you, the same way that The Shade was nothing when I took him over, you will love this character when I’m done with him.”

You must get excited.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 17 March 2008 at 8:12pm
I enjoyed most of Robinson's STARMAN and he wrote a great Batman as long as it wasn't Batman as a guest star in his Starman title. But, the announcement of this title doesn't do much for me. As he seems to think that Congo Bill and Congorilla needs rescuing and made cool, it seems to me coming to the characters from the wrong direction. It seems each writer that does Congo Bill wants to do their own take instead of trying to actually write the character.
Did he rescue the Shade? He certainly changed the character from what he was before. Personally, I was pretty indifferent about what he did with the Shade. And half of his stuff done with golden-age characters struck me as being needless modern revisionism, putting in retcons on top of things Roy Thomas already covered as if he really did want to usurp Roy Thomas' status as a golden-age expert.
-------------
|
Posted By: Andrew Hess
Date Posted: 18 March 2008 at 7:47am
I'm upset in ways I can't tell you about Congorilla starring in a Justice League
book.
I have to go be by myself, now.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 18 March 2008 at 8:14am
|
Before all of the apologists and Robinson defenders start in with the whole "How can you pick it apart before you've even seen it?" thing, let me add that this sounds a bit ..... out there.
AND why is there a need to do another Justice League book anyway?
For example: All those multiple X-Men spin-offs accomplished was separating the team members and dispersing them all over hell's creation, so that the likelyhood of seeing the "real" X-Men together again for continued character development [in the same book] would be only an occasional thing at best.
This type of editorial decision is nothing more than pandering to the individual creator and not at all in the best interests of the Justice League (or any other) concept.
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 18 March 2008 at 9:21am
|
I guess philosophically I've had no real problem with Robinson's take on Golden Agers, as I consider GOLDEN AGE to be an Elseworlds as it was meant to be.
His quote may be a little overtly "hey fanboy, dig this!", but his estimation of his version of the Shade being one of the more interesting characters in a DC Comic in recent years probably isn't hyperbole.
And really, it's hard to fault a guy for getting excited over Congorilla...I know we'd all love the characters to remain "as they were", but Congorilla in a modern context is a hard enough sell. I loved what AGENTS OF ATLAS did with Gorilla Man, which didn't ruin the character I don't think. It's a slight variation...making Congo Bill 90 years old is the biggest change.
Speaking of which, did anyone ever read the Steve Englehart CONGORILLA mini-series? I'd like to know if it's good, bad, or indifferent:

|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 18 March 2008 at 10:06am
I enjoyed the mini-series quite a bit. It builds off of the character and
Janu as they were used in SWAMP-THING, but it re-centers Bill as a viable
hero. I'd love if they used it as a starting point for the character in the
modern age, Bill is older but he's still as capable as other characters of
his generation, the JSA and Slam Bradley, his age topping out around half
of what it would be in the real world.

-------------
|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 18 March 2008 at 11:01am
|
From that article:
"It’s the same thing with the Justice League – they’re rarely about bringing villains to justice, or even bringing justice to the world at large. They’re attacked and they defend themselves, or there’s a crime in progress and they go and fight it. Again, they’re candidates for calling themselves The Crime Stoppers. Or the World Police. My thinking was that if you have ‘Justice’ in your name, then you should do something about bringing justice to people, or bringing villains to justice."
***
Uh oh.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 18 March 2008 at 4:45pm
|
I don't know, this approach could be quite novel. If Robinson is saying what I think he is, then he's talking about personalizing the superhero/supervillain relationship, as well as the relationship between the public and superheroes.
I can imagine someone, some ordinary schlub, caught up in some web of deceit with some super-villain, in a situation completely out of his control, with a story centering around how this poor guy might ask for help from the Trinity and the JLA...I mean, just because they are the world's biggest team doesn't mean they aren't approachable...or, maybe that's the crux of the story, that this guy can't reach these Big Guns even though they're needed. All he can get is a contact with some "street level" cat, like Green Arrow, Batman, or Hawkman, and how Hawkman ect. might act on his own when the JLA won't deign to check out this guy's story. After all, the schlub might be a loony tune himself.
Also, you could go in the direction of super-villain focus, and how hard it is to operate in a world full of heroes. I know the super-villain as protagonist is getting done to death a little bit these days, but I've yet to not be fascinated with the super-villain as having power of a superhero but the amorality to not hold back, unlike the hero. Which is why the Reverse-Flash should be one of the most powerful villains in all of comicdom...he's the Flash, with all the Flash's abilities, and no problem killing if he has to (well, if he wasn't being written as psychotic, which is unfortunate and a bit typical), but you add super-speed and it really gets scary. He should be almost impossible to stop under any circumstance, except by the Flash.
Anyway, I don't think Robinson is going to X-FORCE the JLA...but even if he did, it'd STILL be worlds better than X-FORCE.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 18 March 2008 at 4:47pm
|
I meant to say, Robinson may be heading for an ASTRO CITY type series of stories, more psychological perhaps. As long as the JLA doesn't start ripping the heads off everyone and crapping down their neck, I think it'll be okay.
|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 18 March 2008 at 4:48pm
|
We'll see what happens. I just instictively cringe when I read someone getting too analytical about a concept that has worked well for over 40 years.
|
Posted By: John Webb
Date Posted: 18 March 2008 at 5:05pm
|
Robinson on the JLA? I'm in for this one.
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 18 March 2008 at 5:52pm
I read the last two Congorilla minis, and they pretty much stunk. The first one had Janu screwing Congo Bill over and trading bodies with him so Bill could take the fall when a deal with crooks goes bad. Janu used the Gorilla body to become a crime boss.
The second one had some good Corben art on the covers, but did a standard Vertigo number on the character that left him a little the worse for wear.
If Robinson can put any kind of shine into Congorilla, I say kudos to him.
|
Posted By: Emery Calame
Date Posted: 18 March 2008 at 6:08pm
|
" standard Vertigo number "
Ah! So I'm not crazy. Someone else saw it happening too!
-------------
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 18 March 2008 at 6:31pm
Considering that Robinson's take is basically killing off the human being half of Congorilla leaving just a gorilla with a human brain, I think it's pretty much moving the character in the wrong direction. The character is basically a superhero concept in that Congo Bill is the real identity and the gorilla his superhero id when Congo Bill isn't enough. And his using his work on Shade as an example, it just seems to highlight this is all about his "rescuing" the character by changing the basic nature of said character.
I thought the first mini at least got kudos for working with the character as he had last appeared and then took steps to revitalizing Congo Bill as a hero again. 'Course it didn't do Janu any favors.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 18 March 2008 at 6:32pm
|
I didn't even know about the Vertigo Congorilla...called CONGO BILL, and yes anything Vertigo mixed with Golden Age is downright frightening. Yet I'm still intrigued despite myself.
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 19 March 2008 at 11:10am
I think the precedent was set in Swamp Thing way back when Veitch was on the book. Bill was already pretty old, and it was implied that he was over the hill, so chose to inhabit the Golden Gorilla's body, while his human body (with gorilla brain) ran with the gorillas. This led immediately into the first Congorilla series with Janu taking over the Gorilla body and becoming a crime Lord. Meanwhile, Bill's body sustained a number of disfiguring injuries, as its physical capabilities were far less than those of a gorilla's.
Is Robinson picking up this thread that was already laid down viv-a-vis Bill's status quo? It seems that way from the little information we've been given. Hopefully he can bring something positive to the character, because I'm really tired of losing beloved DC characters by attrition in one mega event or another. Also, if it means more apes on the covers, I. AM. SO. THERE!
Now, if only someone will get the bright idea to put him in a fight with Robotman on Dinosaur Island, my brain can happily explode.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 19 March 2008 at 12:22pm
Make it with both the golden-age AND silver-age Robotman, and you'd
have one way cool one shot extravaganza.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 20 March 2008 at 3:30pm
|
It's hard to really measure the power of Monkey vs Robot.

|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 20 March 2008 at 3:41pm
|
Now THAT'S what I'm talkin' about! Although I really think there chould be 30% more dinosaur. That little lizard in the bottom right corner just don't cut it . . .
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 20 March 2008 at 6:53pm
|
True, true. I posted this somewhere else recently, but consider for a moment that this cover might hold behind it a story that could change your life, and it becomes even more wondrous. Plus, it's EDIT excuse me ANDRU.

|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 21 March 2008 at 12:23pm
|
aaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh. That's the stuff!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 26 March 2008 at 7:21pm
|
Finally picked up IRON GHOST in trade form...

I had a good time with this story...and without spoiling too much, the very title of the book is quite misleading. I was surprised by the economy of the story and how much I grew to like the characters involved, especially the German officer with the burned face. What it is, is a well-told little mystery, and it's well worth any Pulp lovers time to seek it out...a nice one and done.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 27 March 2008 at 8:59am
|
Time to dig up Earth-2's bones and kick them around a little, as JB would say:

http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=151567 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=151567
|
Posted By: Adam Hutchinson
Date Posted: 27 March 2008 at 9:34am
Based on the strength of JSA, I'm really looking forward to the return of Earth-2. Didn't DC say that it wasn't an exact duplicate of the the pre-Crisis Earth-2?
-------------
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 27 March 2008 at 9:36am
Don't care for the image that much, but THAT'S the Justice Society (with a
little Infiniti Inc thrown in).
Wish the current environment in the DCU could make me more than just
guarded hopeful.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 27 March 2008 at 9:49am
|
Personally I could stand less Nuklon, but I'm all for the return of Earth-2 Robin (best costume) and Huntress.
And we still can't get Barry Allen back! Funny!
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 27 March 2008 at 11:06am
|
A world where Ted Knight, Johnny Thunder, Helena Wayne, Dick Grayson, Kent Nelson and Sylvester Pemberton (and the rest!) are still among the living is definitely one I'd be happy to read about.
|
Posted By: Bob Simko
Date Posted: 27 March 2008 at 12:23pm
Posted By: Bob Gilson
Date Posted: 27 March 2008 at 9:20pm
|
Cool a trip to Earth 2. Looks like its going to be a fun summer.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 27 March 2008 at 9:38pm
Funny. Had a really long telephone call with Geoff just yesterday about this storyline among others.
Its very very cool stuff coming up...JSA fans are in for a real ride!!
<wish I were drawing it.>
|
Posted By: Joe Zhang
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 12:23am
|
Alex Ross can paint a turd and I would still be in awe. On the other hand, I wish he would stop using turds as his subject matter. Who among us actually missed Earth-2?
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 12:30am
Posted By: Michael Myers
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 2:34am
I'll second that hand raise...
'Can't quite muster anything beyond Love's "guarded hopefulness", either, however.
|
Posted By: Dave Phelps
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 5:53am
|
I'm torn on Earth-2. I loved that stuff, but I also really like having the JSA and the JLA on the same Earth.
Not sure how I feel about the annual. If we're going to get more "classic JSA," I'd rather see it in the form of untold tales rather than a faux Earth Two.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 7:39am
I like having the JSA and others on one Earth too. At least in theory. And
the first thing DC did after doing that was get rid of the JSA, and start
changing all the characters from the various Earths into almost
unrecognizeable versions. Even though they brought the JSA back, most
of the team has been scuttled to the point it doesn't really feel like the JSA
anymore. And they continue killing off classic versions of the characters
and replacing them with new kewl and PC versions. And the current DCU
is just so bleak. And even if it was "Untold Tales" you have the problems
of it having to be untold tales via current continuity. No Wonder Woman,
Superman, Batman, Robin or Huntress. If it's a story detailing a team-up
with the Seven Soldiers, you're forced to use the secretly villainous Spider
instead of Green Arrow and Speedy.
So, it'd be kinda nice to know there's an Earth out there with the Huntress
as she was originally designed, the JSA hasn't been killed off to make
room for legacy characters but the legacies are still there. I'd go as far as
making it not Earth-2 per se, but Earth-G for lack of better term. An Earth
where all of DC's GA heroes still reside fighting the good fight. Where the
teams JSA, Infinity Inc, Law's Legionnaires, Freedom Fighters, and Crime
Crusaders have their own niches as their world's heroes.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 8:33am
|
I miss Earth 2. I miss the hell out of Earth 2 Superman. Any chance he returns?
|
Posted By: Paul Greer
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 8:39am
I haven't been reading JSA since the relaunch. This Earth-2 comeback might make me give it another look.
-------------
|
Posted By: Adam Hutchinson
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 8:51am
|
Paul, JSA's been REALLY good. I think anyway.
I like the idea of having the idea of "New" Earth having the post-crisis "it all happened on one world" JSA and then having an Earth-2 with a version of the pre-crisis JSA with Infinity Inc. It lets fans of both (like myself) have our cake and eat it too. Course maybe I'm just being selfish.
-------------
|
Posted By: Michael Andrew Gonoude
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 9:21am
|
Joe Zhang (in part): "Who among us actually missed Earth-2?"
(waving hand frantically) I did! I did!
|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 10:06am
|
I have no problem with a return to Earth 2.
|
Posted By: Bob Simko
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 12:43pm
|
I always enjoyed E-2 more than E-1 as a kid. A highlight of my summer used to be tha annual JLA/JSA team up.
|
Posted By: Brad Brickley
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 12:54pm
Liked Earth -2 very much, also liked the Super Squad with those Wally Wood inks. Very fun books for me as a kid. I never could figure out why people couldn't figure out the Earth-1/2 differences, seemed obvious to me at the time.
-------------
|
Posted By: Dave Phelps
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 1:08pm
|
I think it's just one of those "some people get it, some people don't" kinds of things. I never had trouble with it (heck my first DC comic had Earth-2, the Legion, etc. Talk about deep end of the pool! :-) ), but I was talking to a guy a few years ago who said that he was so confused by it he never touched a DC book again until a year or two after Crisis.
(Of course, in these "we don't need no steenking exposition" days, it probably would be confusing to understand what's what. At least back then they were kind enough to take a panel or two to catch you up.)
|
Posted By: Eric Smearman
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 1:23pm
|
I loved Earth-2. All-Star Squadron was a big favorite for me. I also loved the "Generations" arc in Infinity, Inc. My first JLA was the JLA-JSA team-up with the Seven Soldiers of Victory!
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 1:39pm
|
Looks like Jo Zhang is the minority on this thread . . .
|
Posted By: Hunter McFalls
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 2:15pm
Posted By: Steven Cassidy
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 4:24pm
|
Earth 2 Robin, the real Robin, is back.
The real Huntress is back.
Neptune Perkins is back.
Batman died a hero's death - and is dead.
Don't see many down sides on bringing back Earth 2.
Hopefully they'll roll back prices, too.
|
Posted By: Thom Price
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 4:30pm
I loved E-2 as a kid, but I think the only way I'd be interested in them now is if their adventures were set back in the 1940s and/or 1950s. I admit I liked the "older" JSA as presented in Infinity Inc, but these guys would be 85-90 by now. Even their kids would be pushing 50!
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 4:41pm
|
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=151725 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=151725
AVENGERS/INVADERS big interview with Jim Krueger and Alex Ross (of course). And a relative ton of Steve Sadowski art. I dig Steve's work. And that is one wickedly cool Red Skull...



|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 4:53pm
|
If they're throwing in Infinity Inc cats, what about All-Stars Iron Munro, Neptune Perkins, Tsunami (hot Asian villain type), Flying Fox and so on. And could Judomaster find his way to this Earth? And the Earth 2 Robotman, Bob Crane! 
And I want, demand, that Hourman (Rex Tyler) be given star status. Where's the Hourman love?

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 4:58pm
|
Alex Ross cover for issue 2 of AVENGERS/INVADERS:

|
Posted By: Matt Hawes
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 5:09pm
Chad wrote:
| ...I miss Earth 2. I miss the hell out of Earth 2 Superman. Any chance he returns?... |
|
|
I don't know for sure, but I think that the death of the Earth-2 Superman might have something to do with the legal battle between DC and Jerry Seigel's family. I know at one point that DC's lawyers were claiming that Seigel's family only had claim to the first Superman story that Jerry and Joe Shuster brought to National Comics. That would, technically, be the Earth-Two Superman.
It seemed that "Infinite Crisis" was created in good part to get rid of Superboy and the original Superman to rid DC of any legal problems with the characters. That seems to be why Kon-El and the Earth-Prime Superman are no longer referred to as "Superboy," and the character in the new "Legion of Super-Heroes" cartoon is called "Young Superman," as well as the Kingdom Come Superman being more or less used as a substitute for the Earth-2 Superman in the latest issues of "JSA."
-------------
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 5:21pm
Geez, after seeing that and the earth2 art, has Alex Ross fallen in love with
the white of the board, or what?
|
Posted By: Thom Price
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 5:23pm
Iron Man's armor looks like he's wearing thigh-high hooker boots.
-------------
|
Posted By: Derek Muthart
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 6:04pm
|
Wow. The ret-con has been ret-conned.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 7:44pm
|
I also want to point out, concerning Steve Sadowski's art above...that Spider-Man up there is absolutely beautiful. That's probably the closest I've seen to Webhead looking like what I remember from MARVEL TALES under Conway/Andru. Very well done, sir.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 8:05pm
Thanks, Chad...I truly appreciate that! :) Andru ( and Kane) are my two favorite Spidey Artists, so that means a lot!
He was WAY harder to draw that I initially thought he would be..The first one took HOURS to draw, he's gotten easier now.. <but not much>
|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 8:07pm
|
The expression on Namor's face in the second panel is great. He looks like he's enjoying the excitement of battle.
|
Posted By: Hunter McFalls
Date Posted: 28 March 2008 at 8:51pm
|
Digg'in the Red Skull, and Venom too!
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 29 March 2008 at 2:44pm
I'm thinking someone whited out the edges of that Ross cover in order to hide some revealing stuff. The beauty of a new Earth 2 is that DC can sidestep the whole having fought in WW2 thing (which our current JSA has done), and retain the entire All Star Squadron cast of characters as rough contemporaries to the JLA, Titans, Outsiders et al, so that we can read stories of JSA characters who might be in their late 40's with grown-up children, but still young and vital enough to be full-time crime fighters.
If we take into account the All Star Annual in which the energies of Ian Karkull kept the main JSA roster young and vital, there's no reason we should ever read another exchange between Wildcat and the Atom about how past their prime and over the hill they are. Let's hope DC realizes this as well.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 31 March 2008 at 6:27pm
|
Preview of SUPERPOWERS ish 2, with a look at the newest covers for ishs 4 and 5. http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=151987 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=151987
I just want to say, I cannot get any more excited to see HYDRO starring. I recently discovered the character. I would love it if Hydro and Man O'Metal were teamed up, as the two of them seemed pretty inseperable on the old covers in the 1940s.


|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 31 March 2008 at 6:31pm
|
A Jim Krueger interview covering the plans: http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=13537 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=13537
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 31 March 2008 at 9:26pm
Those are two great covers! I wish the stories were as colorful and super-heroic. Hydroman & Pyroman would make a pretty lethal combo. The cover of with the Target and Targeteers makes them look like they either have super-speed or are ballet dancers. Of course, they really were just non-powered guys wearing bullet proof costumes. Don't know if they liked to dance.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 01 April 2008 at 5:55pm
|
I will say, Ross seems to be putting a heck of a lot more heart in his SUPERPOWERS covers than in his Big Two stuff.
I've been thinking recently about this Golden Age "revival" happening...I'm wondering if it's part, well, that these characters are really dynamic and cool and sadly forgotten (and maybe not in dire need of Ross revision, but that's another argument), and partly that readers are sick of reading about superhero icons who are so tangled in warped, convoluted storylines, who aren't remotely recognizable.
The thing about these characters being dug up by Larsen, Ross, ect, is that they are generally solid in their history (unless you're talking about the horrible stuff laid on the Whizzer), and they appeal to a basic human goodness and responsibility. The Golden Agers fought the TRUE good fight (WW 2 mostly), and they are heroes because they were on the side of Right, not because they were self-aggrandizing.
Which is part of the problem intellectually with SUPERPOWERS so far...the characters aren't given a chance to reclaim their heroic status before they're cast as villainous/antihero by-products of the story.
Ross' covers, above, seem to be rife with the heroic appeal of these fascinatingly cool characters, but the storyline involving them is wasting their potential to be poignant. There's a void between where Ross is on these covers and what's in the books so far.
I would have loved, LOVED it, if Ross, Krueger and a score of artists (maybe even JB?) could have decided to make SUPERPOWERS exactly what these covers suggest: a (re)introductory team-up title showcasing specific characters in adventures within a broader storyline, sort of what Mark Waid's doing in BRAVE AND THE BOLD, but way tighter.
I mean, that wouldn't give Ross the chance to CHANGE them, I understand...and maybe that's at the heart of it for those guys. Larsen, for his part, kind of grasped this notion of a lot of artists working on these characters, which would have been cool. Then you could have a rotating set of artists dealing with the specifics of their "team-up", say The Face and The Owl, with Ross "editing" to get the storylines to come together in 12 issues:
Each of these books, or perhaps two sets, would have different writer/artists on their team-up...Face/Owl by JB for instance.
- Madame Masque/ Samson
- Black Terror/ Green Lama
- The Face/ The Owl
- Daredevil/ The Flame
- The Arrow/ The Target
- MM/ Samson
- The Face/ The Owl
- Black Terror/ Green Lama
- Daredevil/ Flame
- Arrow/ Target
- All
- All
JB does two issues, then contributes on the final two (maybe divvied up among a host of artists?). The "unrelated" team-up adventures JB set forth end up being part of a greater whole, and that'd be your "series".
Why wouldn't that work? Just tell good individual team-up stories and let the chips fall...and in the process lose a lot of WATCHMENesque cliches.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 02 April 2008 at 8:15am
I agree. I don't really understand bringing them back just to change them.
Even if you find the personalities a little two-dimensional and generic,
there's more to fleshing out a character than just playing up un-favorable
characteristic traits and making them unsympathetic. And there's plenty
of great villains from the same comics that one doesn't need to play the
hero vs. hero card. Plus, it seems for that angle to have any real impact,
you need to actually establish the characters, their relevance as heroes. In
his interview, Krueger talks about the urn changing the characters, but
since he hasn't given us any real prior context of the characters, those
changes have zero relevance for anyone not already familiar with the
characters. We get angry Black Terror with a slightly new costume but we
don't know if in this universe, that was always the case or not.
It's part of the craftsmanship of WATCHMEN in fact, the whole series was
about creating that particular superhero world and the history and how
the characters were interrelated while unfolding the mystery plot. It
understood that it was one part milieau story and one part mystery thus
both characters and their world and context were all equally important to
the structure of the story. It's interesting that both THE TWELVE and
SUPERPOWERS seem to take their cues from WATCHMEN but each only
focuses on one half of the equation and each suffers for it. THE TWELVE
has some great character moments but the story goes nowhere fast and
doesn't really use the medium to its advantage. SUPERPOWERS is all plot
but does a poor job establishing the characters and making sure the plot
and actions of the characters make sense in the context.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 02 April 2008 at 8:51am
|
Chad & Ed have nicely summed up the "key" reasons why the various golden age revivals are landing somewhat off the mark with those of us who appreciate the original versions of these classic characters.
I heartily agree with Chad's statement "that readers are sick of reading about superhero icons who are so tangled in warped, convoluted storylines, who aren't remotely recognizable."
Hear, hear!
And like Ed, I also fail to "understand bringing them back just to change them."
I'm hoping for the best from these series, but both Project: Superpowers & The Twelve are on a short leash with me and I am afraid they may run out of rope all too soon.
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 02 April 2008 at 9:30am
My first exposure to the Owl came from THE OCCULT FILES OF DR.
SPECTOR. Instantly struck me as a cool hero in the Batman mold.

-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 02 April 2008 at 5:54pm
|
There's more plot and character development in that page than in all the issues of THE TWELVE and SUPERPOWERS combined so far.
Wild.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 02 April 2008 at 6:26pm
|
I posted above a page from GOLDEN AGE which is sort of where WATCHMEN and the DCU met, briefly.
The thing is, even GOLDEN AGE under Robinson/Smith made the mistake of launching "their" versions of the JSA before the JSA could be given a heroic ideal, an ideal that would make their various betrayals of each other and themselves even more poignant...what GOLDEN AGE did have going for it was a contextual resonance of the JSA having fought in WW 2, providing the reader a way to "get" the JSA as great heroes suffering their sudden resentment of the "new world" of post-War America. If you consider that there was a grim backlash by the returning vets of WW 2, culminating in the "noir" period in films and books that prevaded the late 40s and 50s, then GOLDEN AGE makes more sense as a "Coming Home" story than a superhero tale, obviously.
Point is, GOLDEN AGE still worked for me because of the highly unique takes on Cap Triumph, Hourman, Robotman and what motivated them...even if those motivations ran contrary to the notion of "hero". Being an "Elseworlds", and about the "JSA" who, at the time, were barely noticeable within the DCU, I enjoyed the story for what it was, a post-War parable.
SUPERPOWERS and THE TWELVE has nothing of the scope of GOLDEN AGE (so far)...both series seek to bring these heroes into the modern world/future society, but have failed somewhat. I think the characters should exist in a "timeless" placement...in a fictional city, within their own perimeters. I don't think the whole world has to be changed to accomodate the characters of SUPERPOWERS...so far, the "changed world" has just seemed sketchy and ill-defined, which frustrates me. Say what you will about GOLDEN AGE and WATCHMEN, but the world they live in is efficiently defined by well-done expository asides and character interaction. I'm still trying to figure out if THE TWELVE is supposed to be in the MU, or if SUPERPOWERS is supposed to be the future, or what. It's a failure of the two series that they aren't allowing the characters to view their world, but instead only to bemoan their own fates. It wouldn't take much to provide some effective layering so the reader clearly understands where these characters stand.
That said, I still bought THE TWELVE ish EDIT 4 and intend to get SUPERPOWERS ish 2...I keep hoping the two series will "find themselves". SUPERPOWERS in particular is crumbling due to Jim Krueger's reliance on his conceit of the Fighting Yank as an octogenarian narrator...the problem is all the heroes are being viewed through the eyes of a guy who betrayed every one of them. That doesn't lend itself to "awe-inspiring" dynamism, just wondering when the betrayed will kill the narrator, or whatever. Confusing.
|
Posted By: Jay Matthews
Date Posted: 02 April 2008 at 6:35pm
|
I've been asleep at the switch -- when did Superpowers 1 come out, and is that the only one out?
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 02 April 2008 at 7:31pm
|
Yes, Jay. There's been an ish Zero which is actually fairly decent, and ish 1 headlining Black Terror and Green Lama, and ish 2 must be right around the corner.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 02 April 2008 at 8:25pm
Posted By: Ron Sluyter
Date Posted: 02 April 2008 at 9:18pm
|
I also want to point out, concerning Steve Sadowski's art above...that Spider-Man up there is absolutely beautiful. That's probably the closest I've seen to Webhead looking like what I remember from MARVEL TALES under Conway/Andru. Very well done, sir.
*****
Hey Steve, you draw a great Captain America too
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 03 April 2008 at 4:08pm
Thanks, Ron, drop me an Email..;) I havent forgotten!!
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 04 April 2008 at 2:02pm
|
Idle speculation here: All those characters that Alex Ross is using in Super Powers are pretty much public domain, albeit altered slightly in name or outfit so as not to step on any Johhny-come-latelies from DC or Marvel who are currently using the name. That means that anybody can do a comic of one of those characters so long as they don't duplicate what's already in print. So if, say, Chad Carter were to write an 8-page story about the Target and his Targeteers, for example, somebody from the sketchbook thread might undertake to draw it up. Just putting this idea out there . . .
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 04 April 2008 at 5:00pm
|
Hmmm. And I think the very basis of public domain concerns the notion that the applicable "new" work be based ONLY on the original content. Whatever is done after that, and having nothing to do with any alternate versions of, say, The Face or Man O'Metal, is free love...
Tap tap tap...
|
Posted By: Michael Myers
Date Posted: 04 April 2008 at 7:48pm
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 05 April 2008 at 1:13pm
|
JSA CLASSIFIED: WILDCAT


SLIGHTLY SPOILERY!!!
Before I get to any complaining, I want to say Ramon Perez's art is really nice. It has a cartoony quality without surrendering relevance and dynamism.
But one thing I think is tiring is the constant reminder that WIldcat is "old", and that Ted Grant was a heavyweight champ who is "old". Whenever we get Ted Grant, we get boxing allusions and age jokes.
I thought B. Clay Moore was going to send us in another direction when he shows Wildcat knocking out Solomon Grundy, by himself (as unlikely as that should probably be, but I could go with it)...but instead it turns out this was a prelude to Wildcat getting beaten up by some amateur boxers with baseball bats.
I mean, you can't have Wildcat beat the hell out of Grundy and then get the hell kicked out of him by dudes with baseball bats. Sorry.
Worse yet, Ted strangely goes from feeling his costume and cat-face motorcycle are too ridiculous for serious "investigating" and ditches both...only to fortunately be back in costume for the second issue. Ted's crisis of identity is supposed to be a theme, but he's not the type of character who NEEDS a crisis of identity.
Moore's script seems confused about what's being presented...Ted Grant shouldn't feel like he's over the hill, he should be feeling pretty good. In fact, Ted's the kind of bachelor any man would want to be if he could, he's Sinatra-cool, he can charm the thongs off twenty-somethings like Selina Kyle, and he fears absolutely nothing or no one.
I don't understand how age affects Ted Grant...he's obviously a mature man, in his 50s, but he's awesome and knows it. Having Ted moan about his age is just banal...Ted's like Charles Bronson, and Bronson wasn't crying in his martini over how old he was getting. By the time Bronson was in his 50s, he was arguably the biggest movie star on the PLANET...and superheroing is Ted's second career, and he should be one of if not THE best non-superhuman crimefighter out there, period.
Anyway, of course Wildcat will seem "used up" when every story is basically the same story. Wildcat is one of those characters who seems typecast for certain types of stories, which is really depressing.
Again, if you're buying these issues, buy them for the Ramon Perez art...Moore's script is kind of meandering, but I'm still enjoying it (though waiting for some kind of actual story to occur).
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 06 April 2008 at 12:30am
|
One of my favorite Wildcat stories is the issue of JSA in which the Injustice Society invades JSA headquarters and Wildcat beats them all single-handed. He's not old, he's a crafty veteran and should be written that way. For that matter, I've had enough of unoriginal writers dragging out the "are we too old to be fighting crime?" schtick for the surviving original JSA members. It was precisely this bit of incessant whining that ruined the previous JSA title for me (with the Mike Parobeck art).Thankfully, Geoff Johns avoids beating this tired horse in his version.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 06 April 2008 at 3:03am
|
Ron, I get asked more about THAT issue than any other...I think a LOT of people share your opinion!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 06 April 2008 at 3:10pm
|
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=15866 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=15866
Previews of Joe Kubert's new covers creating one cover for Dark Horse's Robert Howard horde of upcoming titles.




Sweet stuff!
|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 06 April 2008 at 3:34pm
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 06 April 2008 at 4:24pm
|
Wow....absolutely perfect.
|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 06 April 2008 at 4:27pm
|
John Buscema was the master of Conan art, and if any living artist can match him, Kubert is the one!
|
Posted By: John Peter Britton
Date Posted: 06 April 2008 at 4:42pm
|
Can't argue with you there Aaron.
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 06 April 2008 at 8:16pm
Stephen Sadowski:
"Ron, I get asked more about THAT issue than any other...I think a LOT of people share your opinion!"
I wish the whole age thing (as well as the dead members) could have been done away with altogether in the last Crisis miniseries. What I liked about your run on the title, Stephen, was that you were able to depict the original members as belonging to an older generation, without making them look like doddering old coots. They were(are) still in very good shape, and in full command of their physical and mental faculties. The Wildcat story should stand as an example of how to write and draw the founding JSA members the right way.
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 06 April 2008 at 11:11pm
Its a very funny thing, Ron. When I started on JSA, I was adamant that they be portrayed as very virile older men. I know of MANY older men in their 50's-60's and beyond who are in GREAT shape. I see NO reason that even the retired JSA wouldnt be in TOP form.
I think DC just didnt know what to do with these guys.
Even in the first script, Wildcat says something about his 'love handles'. A lifelong boxer and Superhero...?
Nahh, I just ignored it..
I think people KNOW that these are older characters.You dont need to show them hobbling around..Just as Bruce Wayne is suddenly much closer in age to Dick Grayson...they will always be older, but you dont need to emphasize their age..
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 07 April 2008 at 11:53am
Stephen Sadowski:
"I think DC just didnt know what to do with these guys."
Their entire post-Crisis on Infinite Earths history in print seems to confirm that opinion. What a shame that you (and Robinson, Goyer and Johns) only got a hold of the team after a variety of half-assed "events" destroyed much of their original membership. Not that I dislike some of their replacements, but, well, you know, there's some kind of powerful allure to the originals, just by virtue of the time in which they first appeared, which imparts them with an almost mythic quality (yes, even good ol' Johnny Thunder!).
I dare anyone who is a JSA fan to look upon that wonderful Murphy Anderson pinup of the team's assembled roster (most recently reprinted in the second JLA/JSA teamup trade, I believe) and try not to get a lump in their throat.
For this reason, I am looking forward to this year's JSA annual, whose cover seems to imply that many of these characters are alive, intact, and more importantly, active members of the crime-fighting community.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 07 April 2008 at 2:21pm
|
Okay, I may not be a Captain Action expert, and I know it doesn't technically fall under the theme of the thread, but CA seems very Pulp Hero inspired, at least in this fantastic cover by Paul Gulacy:

Dig that crazy "full" meter on the funky Luger!
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=152833 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=152833 for an interview with Fabian Nicieza about his involvement.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 07 April 2008 at 2:48pm
I'm looking forward to Captain Action! Loved the old DC series with Gil
Kane art.
The cover isn't even half bad (not really a Gulacy fan). Although, having
the much smaller figure of Action Boy positioned so he's in front of the
Captain Action figure doesn't read right to me. Nor the reclining babe
floating against a photoshop gradient fill, makes it look like she was just
pasted on top.
-------------
|
Posted By: William Lukash
Date Posted: 07 April 2008 at 3:17pm
|
I'm very tired of Wilcat having those taped fists. It was kind of neat at first, but it really, really looks dumb now that the tape goes all the way to his elbows.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 07 April 2008 at 3:37pm
|
Gotta agree about the taped fists on Wildcat--like a lot of "touches" on the old characters, it ends up getting exaggerated for effect, but seems kind of retarded from the viewpoint of Ted Grant having any kind of "secret" identity, else why the cat mask?
Now, if you're talking "realistic", I suppose it'd be smart to tape the wrists and hands to keep from breaking them when punching, say, Grundy...but then, Wildcat shouldn't be anywhere near Grundy at any time.
I think in the recent ALL-STAR COMICS trade releases of the Joe Staton/Wally Wood stuff, there's an instance where Wildcat goes up against Grundy, briefly, and gets posterized.

This cover (by Rich Buckler and Wally Wood) seems a bit off in the scale department...Grundy is Mighty Joe Young size here. Which seems slightly too big for Grundy.
Here, some eight years later in ALL-STAR SQUADRON, Buckler tackles Grundy more to what I consider scale:

Maybe the first cover is one of those "symbolic" covers, but that's beside the point...I've now seen Grundy taken out hand to hand by Wildcat and Green Arrow, and god bless'm, but that should never happen unless Grundy is in some kind of weakened state or just out of his "pupa" rebirth stage.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 07 April 2008 at 4:25pm
|
The Free Comic Book Day offering from the SUPERPOWERS fellows:

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 07 April 2008 at 4:34pm
|
Also, because Eric Powell loves us, we're getting a monthly GOON comic...more in tune with "The Mystery of Mr. Wicker" or CHINATOWN.
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=152806 - http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=152806
Powell's Pulp-inspired madness monthly, fellows!

This panel splash, along with the several displaying Goon's breaking heart in CHINATOWN...if that isn't one of the most heart-breaking moments ever put into a comic, I'll eat a whole can of car wax. Wrenching and powerful stuff.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 11 April 2008 at 5:09pm
|
Check out the "Dial B for Blog" tribute to Charlton's THE PHANTOM and the great Jim Aparo. Click at the bottom of the page for parts two and three!
http://www.dialbforblog.com/ - http://www.dialbforblog.com/

|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 13 April 2008 at 12:03pm
I loved Aparo's and Newton's work on the Phantom. Too few issues. I'm
thinking I don't have all of them though, going to have to do some comic
hunting.
Love that final quote:
"I was never fast. I'd do a page a day -- pencils, inks and letters. I stayed
at that pace and never increased it. I remember when I went to DC,
Carmine Infantino said to me, 'Gee, I wish you could do more work.' I
said, 'How do you want it -- good or fast?' He said, 'I want it good.' I said,
'Okay.' --JIM APARO
A page a day of pencilling, inking AND lettering. Doesn't seem too slow to
me. Imagine his output if he only did one.
-------------
|
Posted By: David Ferguson
Date Posted: 13 April 2008 at 12:40pm
That "Devil" looks a lot like the original DD.
Is it supposed to be him?

-------------
|
Posted By: Ron Chevrier
Date Posted: 13 April 2008 at 3:30pm
|
Yes, but obviously, his former name is in use by a Marvel character, hence the change.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 18 April 2008 at 11:03am
|
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=16057 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=16057
This article covers the artist working on the new SOLOMON KANE comic...Mario Guevara.
I can't say I'm nuts about the style myself. What do you guys think?

I think this sculpture at the Brookgreen Gardens in South Carolina captures SK better. It's called "The Puritan", I believe. EDIT I mean I'm attributing a view of SK onto this statue, which has nothing to do with Howard's creation (as far as I know!)

I have never read a Solomon Kane story in my life, and yet I still think he shouldn't be like a Conanized version of a Puritan. Which is what the Guevara stuff looks like.
|
Posted By: Gerry Turnbull
Date Posted: 18 April 2008 at 11:08am
he should be a lot thinner.i always pictured Peter Cushing when i was reading the Kane stories,or even Daniel Day Lewis . .
-------------
|
Posted By: William Lukash
Date Posted: 18 April 2008 at 12:00pm
|
Well, it has been a while since I've read them, but I do recall having the mental image that Solomon Kane was very tidy, lean, and tall.
I'd love to see Timothy Truman's version, who I believe is the perfect artist for something like this. His Black Lamb series was a good indication.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 18 April 2008 at 2:56pm
|
William, your wish...from trumanstudio.com:



And my favorite of this bunch, "Solomon Kane in Africa!"

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 18 April 2008 at 3:00pm
|
Wanted to post two more great Truman renditions:


|
Posted By: Hunter McFalls
Date Posted: 18 April 2008 at 3:23pm
|
I love that Puritan statue as a possible Solomon Kane
|
Posted By: Gerry Turnbull
Date Posted: 18 April 2008 at 3:27pm
|
Gary Gianni nailed it

-------------
|
Posted By: Gerry Turnbull
Date Posted: 18 April 2008 at 3:29pm

-------------
|
Posted By: Hunter McFalls
Date Posted: 18 April 2008 at 3:48pm
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 18 April 2008 at 5:20pm
|
I wish Gianni was doing the Dark Horse Kane title.
The problem is....wrapped in a Joe Kubert cover, almost ANY artist is going to be a bit of a letdown inside the book.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 18 April 2008 at 6:24pm
|

More Gianni.

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 18 April 2008 at 6:27pm
|
Loved Gianni's Shadow work in the 1990s. I've never seen these pieces (found on his web site):


|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 18 April 2008 at 7:45pm
|
The ONLY reason I ever look at the Sunday comics anymore is to check out Gianni's art on Prince Valiant.
|
Posted By: Gerry Turnbull
Date Posted: 19 April 2008 at 3:29am
|
Aaron, this may be of interest,John Flesk produces magnificent books
http://www.fleskpublications.com/publications/gary -gianni/ - http://www.fleskpublications.com/publications/gary-gianni/
-------------
|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 19 April 2008 at 5:19am
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 19 April 2008 at 1:58pm
|
I'm not even going to say anyone should justify this, but Robert Kirkman is a favorite current writer, the Destroyer is a character sorely neglected, and in this case the MAX label doesn't even faze me...if any character probably could benefit from this approach, it's a character infused with a "Super Soldier" formula whose entire reason for existing was to kill Nazis. He is the DESTROYER, after all.
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=16082 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=16082
I will be all over this:



|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 20 April 2008 at 10:09am
The Destroyer art is a joke, right? Late April fools?
please say it is....
He's a fat guy now?
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 20 April 2008 at 7:04pm
|
He's a fat old guy for sure.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 20 April 2008 at 7:33pm
|
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=16109 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=16109
Announcing the new BPRD arc, which looks to have Lobster Johnson prominently involved somehow:


|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 20 April 2008 at 7:35pm
|
More Solomon Kane... http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=16110 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=16110
Cover by John Cassaday. 
|
Posted By: Flavio Sapha
Date Posted: 20 April 2008 at 7:41pm
|
TIM TRUMAN is the patron saint of this thread!
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 20 April 2008 at 8:13pm
I get to see Tim Next week!
He's a really great guy!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 26 April 2008 at 1:58pm
|
I know I've posted the site before, but Tom Floyd's Captain Spectre is just too cool. Plus, check out the Terranauts and Ghost Zero! I haven't even figure those sites out or the stories behind them, but Tom Floyd has his own little cave of cool on the internet.
http://www.captainspectre.com/4_9.html - http://www.captainspectre.com/4_9.html
 

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 27 April 2008 at 3:06pm
|
Found the cover of AVENGERS/INVADERS ish 3...two Namors duking it out. Did the Golden Age version scream "Imperious Rex!"? Did the GA version have a battle cry?
I've become much more into Namor in recent times, thinking about how he's the Original Anti-hero, a real bastard with a mean streak, and yet very directly following his own moral compass, grown around pride. I like these kind of characters a lot more these days.

|
Posted By: Bill Wiist
Date Posted: 27 April 2008 at 3:34pm
What's with Namor's trunks in that picture? Black with strips and a gold waist
band? I don't recall ever seeing that before.
Just as an aside, I'm finding the colors Alex Ross using these days in many of
his covers to be garish and the composition confusing. The red/orange
against the cyan reminded me of that.
-------------
|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 27 April 2008 at 3:44pm
I may take a look at the new DESTROYER MAX book since I like Robert
Kirkman's work on INVINCIBLE, and Cory Walker's artwork seems to fit his
books.
Nice art. I can't recall Namor ever wearing black trunks, but I guess that's
not really a big deal. Aren't those ankle wings on both Sub-Mariners just the
sliiightest bit too big though?
|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 27 April 2008 at 3:45pm
|
Bill, you just beat me on the trunks thing.
|
Posted By: John Young
Date Posted: 27 April 2008 at 5:30pm
|
Being that the thread is talking about Namor is their an essential set of Sub-Mariner?
|
Posted By: Ray Brady
Date Posted: 27 April 2008 at 6:50pm
Some examples of the striped trunks:
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 27 April 2008 at 6:54pm
|
I dig the striped trunks, but my favorites are the ones from the 1950s:
Kind of crimson with a black belt and the little S buckle.
|
Posted By: Bill Wiist
Date Posted: 27 April 2008 at 7:02pm
COOL. Thanks Ray!
(Really love that second one!)
-------------
|
Posted By: John Angelo
Date Posted: 27 April 2008 at 9:01pm
Very cool Kane images.
Gianni is my favorite of those artists shown.
Love that Puritan statue too!
------------- http://www.heroscapers.com/community/showthread.php?t=154 - My Heroscape Fan Art
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 27 April 2008 at 11:10pm
Interesting that Namor had no wings on his feet on those covers..
I wonder WHEN EXACTLY they came into place? Or were these just cover snafus?
|
Posted By: Matt Hawes
Date Posted: 27 April 2008 at 11:32pm
|
I think they were just mistakes, Stephen. Namor had wings on his ankles in the Golden-Age.
Edit to add links:
http://www.terryscomics.com/photogallery/timely/All_Select_5 _1_8.jpg - http://www.terryscomics.com/photogallery/timely/All_Select_5 _1_8.jpg
Cool gallery:
http://www.coverbrowser.com/covers/all-winners-comics - http://www.coverbrowser.com/covers/all-winners-comics
-------------
|
Posted By: Matt Hawes
Date Posted: 27 April 2008 at 11:42pm
Chad wrote:
| ... dig the striped trunks, but my favorites are the ones from the 1950s... |
|
|
Those Atlas covers are from the 1950s. I think the red shorts were mainly from the very early 1960s' Marvel comics appearances.
Edited to add:
Here's some interiors from the Atlas comics, reprinted in "Marvel Masterworks":
http://www.marvelmasterworks.com/marvel/mm/atlas/heroes/imag es/TORCH038014_col.jpg - http://www.marvelmasterworks.com/marvel/mm/atlas/heroes/imag es/TORCH038014_col.jpg
http://www.marvelmasterworks.com/marvel/mm/atlas/heroes/imag es/MENSAD028018_col.jpg - http://www.marvelmasterworks.com/marvel/mm/atlas/heroes/imag es/MENSAD028018_col.jpg
The ankle-wings seemed to have disappeared during the 1950s, it seems. Yet, Namor could still fly. Also, assuming the coloring is faithful to the original comics, Namor did wear the scale shorts also but they were blue in color during that period.
I love that the caption on the one page notes: "The original aquaman."
-------------
|
Posted By: Matt Hawes
Date Posted: 27 April 2008 at 11:44pm
Wallace wrote:
...Aren't those ankle wings on both Sub-Mariners just the sliiightest bit too big though?... |
|
|
Depends on the artist. Alex Ross tends to try and paint characters closely to their earlier appearances. Some artists in the Golden-Age gave Namor pretty big ankle-wings.

Note: This was the last issue of "Sub-Mariner" from the 1940s. Notice that he has the ankle-wings (and they are a bit larger than they would be drawn in later years by most artists).
Here's the next issue of the series, when it was revived in the mid-1950s:

Suddenly, the wings are gone. I will have to check the reprints I own and see if the missing ankle-wings are mentioned in the stories, or if they were just dropped without mention.
-------------
|
Posted By: Bill Wiist
Date Posted: 28 April 2008 at 5:25am
Man, I'm glad we asked about those trunks - love seeing all these old covers.
That last Bill Everett cover ROCKS.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 28 April 2008 at 10:28am
|

Bill Everett in the '50s seems to primarily have Namor in red or navy trunks. There's no real consistency to Namor's panties or ankle wings...sometimes the belt is yellow, sometimes it's blue, sometimes with an S, sometimes not.
In a way though, I guess it's kind of realistic...Namor doesn't like wearing the same Daisy Dukes every day!
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 28 April 2008 at 10:54am
There's a new blog devoted to reprinting golden-age stories of Nedor/
Standard/Better, a new story each day. Don't know how long he'll be able
to keep up the pace, but a good place to check out heroes like the Black
Terror, Fighting Yank, Wonderman, etc.
http://nedor-a-day.blogspot.com - Nedor a day
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 28 April 2008 at 8:00pm
|
Thank you Ed. I'm definitely catching up. The "Doc Strange VS the Mechomen" alone is insane...I'm thankful for a chance to read this stuff!

|
Posted By: William Lukash
Date Posted: 28 April 2008 at 8:42pm
|
Panties?
Anyway, Narmor didn't say "Imperious Rex" in the 40s, and I haven't read all his '50s adventrues, but somehow I think that was a '60s addition.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 28 April 2008 at 9:11pm
|
An artist friend of mine always refers to the briefs or "panties" superheroes wear, like Superman's or Namor's, or the Phantom's striped ones.
I spent a long time disliking Namor as a character (though weirdly the reprints of the John Buscema stuff in TALES OF SUSPENSE in the '70s was a comic I always picked up...it was hard not to dig all that powerful Buscema granduer when Namor started battling.)
The whole "undersea savage" though really appeals to me now. Probably because I've been trying to get an underwater character off the ground for a year now, as a comic.
|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 28 April 2008 at 10:14pm
Thanks for all of the old covers, guys! The orange trunks are my favorites,
but the striped ones could grow on me a bit...
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 29 April 2008 at 5:36am
|
Thanks for that link, Ed.
I like Pyroman and Black Terror, but the one thing I've never figured out is why is Pyroman called Pyroman when his powers are electrical?
-------------
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 29 April 2008 at 7:32am
Definitely one of the greater mysteries. As a kid, I always found his simple
costume appealing though.

-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 29 April 2008 at 8:05pm
|
Was hunting around and ran across two Doc Savage commissions that are simply wonderful, by two Hall of Famers, respectfully Dave Cockrum and Dick Giordano.


|
Posted By: David Pelletier
Date Posted: 29 April 2008 at 8:16pm
nice commisions, which I can "find" some hidden treasures...
------------- http://www.comicartfans.com/GalleryDetail.asp?GCat=32100
http://www.comicartfans.com/gallerydetail.asp?gcat=32100 -
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 30 April 2008 at 8:17pm
|
Okay, I know it's a movie thing, but the Iron Giant still technically qualifies as a "Pulp Hero" in the sense that he's a giant 1950s style robot, in the 1950s...and I ran across this commission section on this cool little website devoted to the character.
http://www.ultimateirongiant.com/origart/origart.php - http://www.ultimateirongiant.com/origart/origart.php
My favorite by a nun's hair, but this Mike Deodato sketch is beautiful!

|
Posted By: Hunter McFalls
Date Posted: 07 May 2008 at 4:07pm
|
Those comissions and sketch are great Chad!
Could you please e-mail me at: mailto:hunterm@mindspring.com - hunterm@mindspring.com
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 07 May 2008 at 5:10pm
|
Definitely one of the greater mysteries. As a kid, I always found his simple costume appealing though.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Same here. I still like the costume. In fact, I don't know if you're aware of the superhero RPG Freedom Force and its sequel, Freedom Force vs. the Third Reich, but it was designed to be extremely player customizable (there are tons of player-made meshes and skins of characters), but I actually requested a Pyroman skin at a board I post at, and someone made one.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 07 May 2008 at 6:03pm
|
Hunter, I unveiled my email. I hadn't thought about it before being Private. Feel free to contact.
|
Posted By: Hunter McFalls
Date Posted: 08 May 2008 at 9:48am
|
Thanks Chad!
E-mail sent.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 08 May 2008 at 6:49pm
|
Aaron Smith: thank you for your kind words, sir!
Hunter: thanks for your interest. I suspect "Spandex Ballet" was nuked as a self-promotional ploy on my part. Didn't think about it from that angle.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 09 May 2008 at 10:06am
|
Commissions found online, Sergio Cariello, Ernie Chan:


|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 09 May 2008 at 10:32am
Those are great. Sergio has a definite Kubert style line there. Guess he
got those Marvel B&W Doc Savage mags.
-------------
|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 09 May 2008 at 3:32pm
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 09 May 2008 at 7:05pm
|

Somebody's lucky commission, from Bob Layton.
I've been pretty smitten by Nyoka the Jungle Girl. Is she public domain? I can't understand why someone hasn't done more with her...she's cheesecake, true, but I feel like she's a jungle character without the inherent problem of jungle characters, in that they're only really interesting when you take them out of the jungle and play the jungle elements of the character off other environments.
In this case, Nyoka is raised in the jungle, but not feral...yet the jungle is as much her home as Tarzan's. She has all the jungle fighter ability but doesn't have the problem of seeming "ordinary" within the jungle environment. So, being "civilized", her conflicts with the native dangers of the jungle aren't "typical", but actually filtered through her civilized view, only she knows how to deal with the dangers instead of being caught flat-footed by them.
Even her name is awesome.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 09 May 2008 at 8:59pm
|
Wow. Neal Adams and the Spirit?

|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 12 May 2008 at 6:47am
Both Nyoka and Spirit pieces are cool.
Nyoka is a strange case. She got her starts in a movie serial titled "Jungle
Girl". For some reason, possibly just to secure the rights to the title, it is
listed as being based on works by Edgar Rice Burroughs, specifically a
story called "The Land of Hidden Men" which was expanded into a novel
called JUNGLE GIRL a decade earlier (the novel was reprinted under the
original title decades later). However, the serial is in no way similar to the
book, from characters on down. There is no Nyoka in Burroughs novel.
The serial was popular enough to spawn a sequel though with a different
actress. Nyoka was different from many of the others of the Jungle Girl
variety, in that she didn't discard civilized clothes for fur bikinis. Instead,
she wore standard explorer/adventure hero garb much like Congo Bill or
Jungle Jim. Although, for the time, a woman that wore almost exclusively
shorts or pants instead of skirts, even in the jungle, might be still
considered quite a bit unconventional.
Fawcett licensed Nyoka for comics. When Fawcett got out of comics, many
of their licensed properties which were still making money were sold and
still continued being put out. Nyoka was one of those, being sold to
Charlton and continuing for a couple of more years. AC Comics has
apparently bought those rights, and has periodically reprinted Nyoka
tales and made use of her occassionally in their titles.
-------------
|
Posted By: Hunter McFalls
Date Posted: 12 May 2008 at 6:38pm
|
Chad, great commisions, love the Erinie Chan Solomon Kane!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 19 May 2008 at 4:19pm
|
Great site for additional scan sources for excellent old Golden Age tales.
http://pappysgoldenage.blogspot.com/ - http://pappysgoldenage.blogspot.com/
And a site I had no idea existed, http://www.dialbforburbank.com/ - http://www.dialbforburbank.com/ for exhaustively cool coverage of a ton of Shadow-related business.
|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 19 May 2008 at 6:04pm
|
That Adams Spirit looks great.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 22 May 2008 at 7:25pm
|
Images found on comicartfans, showing renditions of John K Snyder III doing the "Quality Heroes" or Golden Agers of Marvel...
The Black Marvel

The Blonde Phantom

The Patriot

Really looking and hoping for more of Mr. Snyder's and Tim Truman's THE PROWLER, their 1930's Pulp Hero project first begun at Eclipse back in the 80s, and now getting a new "web comic" treatment (eventually, according to JKS III himself mentioning in passing when I met the cat at a small con in NoVA), which will appear at http://www.comicmix.com/ - http://www.comicmix.com/
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 22 May 2008 at 7:28pm
|
The one image I really have a question about is referred to as "The Whizzer", but it's a Whizzer I've never seen before...

Anyone ever seen this version of the Whizzer? Or is the labeling wrong?
I like the head fin, but I think his yellow togs can look tough, such as via Keith Pollard...

Needs goggles, but still...
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 22 May 2008 at 7:29pm
|
Also:

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 22 May 2008 at 7:32pm
|
Some Sandman action:
By our own Steve Sadowski...

And unfortunately I can't tell who did this...

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 22 May 2008 at 7:34pm
|
And a pretty cool John Cassaday Shadow...

|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 22 May 2008 at 9:06pm
Awesome Blackhawk.
The Whizzer piece, he wore a similar costume a few times in his golden-age appearances before settling on the more familiar yellow one.

-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 22 May 2008 at 9:38pm
|
Look at that. Had no idea.
|
Posted By: Thomas Moudry
Date Posted: 22 May 2008 at 9:43pm
Wow! I've never seen that Whizzer costume before! I prefer the more familiar
costume as I just don't think capes work with speedsters, but what do I
know?
-------------
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 22 May 2008 at 11:02pm
|
Arvel Jones did that Sandman drawin'.
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 12:53am
|
I'll paraphrase something from the Fantastic Four Roast comic:
A guy who calls himself The Whizzer really shouldn't wear yellow!
-------------
|
Posted By: Michael Myers
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 10:01am
'Love seeing the Patriot. I remember being nuts about this character in Thomas' few revival attempts with him and the cobbled together Liberty Legion in the '70s.
Courtesy of Anthony "MAC" Castrillo, here's a depiction of Timely characters in animated style:

http://www.comicartfans.com/GalleryPiece.asp?Page=1&Orde r=Date&Piece=306199&GSub=35682&GCat=0&UCat - Timely 2
edit: just realized I think I saw this because Chad or someone else had already shared it, but I can't find it ....
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 23 May 2008 at 9:39pm
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 24 May 2008 at 12:48am
|
Who is the character in yellow above Miss America? And is that Namora between the Blazing Skull and the Thin Man, or someone else?
Everyone else I recognize.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 24 May 2008 at 2:30pm
|
Definitely Namora, Brian.

But I've been researching for an hour and I can't figure out who the kid is in the yellow with the domino mask.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 24 May 2008 at 3:02pm
|
So while I was messing about, I ran across a couple characters who kind of intrigued me.
One is an android called, alternately, the White Streak or Man O'War.



The only information I can find is probably unreliable, but the idea is kind of cool. I can even get behind those funky eye blasts. I would definitely assume Man O'War is in the public domain.
Also, Captain Terror!

I can't find ANY info on this cat. But the tag line was enough to intrigue me: "Who Dares Defy Captain Terror?" I mean, I like that. It's evocative and menacing, even though this guy is supposed to be a hero. But, like when you're named The Destroyer, if you're Cap Terror, you're getting medieval. It's a mortal lock.
Anyone know anything more on these fellas?
|
Posted By: Aaron Smith
Date Posted: 24 May 2008 at 4:47pm
|
Chad,
http://www.internationalhero.co.uk/c/captainterror.htm - http://www.internationalhero.co.uk/c/captainterror.htm
http://www.geocities.com/jjnevins/terror.html - http://www.geocities.com/jjnevins/terror.html
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 24 May 2008 at 6:12pm
|
Awesome Aaron. Thanks much.
|
Posted By: Michael Myers
Date Posted: 25 May 2008 at 9:23pm
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 26 May 2008 at 2:35pm
|
Beautiful. I wish I could get away with wearing goggles instead of glasses. But I feel like you gotta be shooting dinosaurs with a Tommy Gun from the wing of a bi-plane in order to really get away with it.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 26 May 2008 at 4:55pm
The guy in yellow is more than likely supposed to be either the Fiery Mask or the Phantom Bullet in an alternate costume.
See, Daring Mystery on the covers of issue 1 & 2, the covers are supposed to be of those respective heroes. It's what comics.org says and I've heard a few fans say the same. Personally, looking at the two covers, I say the covers are of the same guy but of no specific hero. If you look at the covers in b/w, it's obvious the character is wearing the same outfit, just the colors have been changed. The covers have more in common to each other than they do to any character inside the books, especially two totally different characters. It stretches credibility that they were originally supposed to be of two different characters. Could they be of just one of them? Possibly, but again, it's not similar to a look either character sported in the given issues. In fact, the coloring is the sole thing that matches the characters but the issue numbers would have to be swapped. The Fiery Mask didn't wear a shirt as in the issue #2 cover but definitely didn't need a gun. The Phantom Bullet did wear a yellow top as on the first issue cover, but he wasn't in the first issue nor why would he have a mace? Notice also, on the original covers... no mask which would be odd for a character called the Fiery MASK. Phantom Bullet? First issue the guy on the cover doesn't even have a gun and PB wasn't in it anyways. The second cover, he does but he's clubbing someone with it. Again, a bit odd for some with his moniker. Also the cover of the first issue, it takes place in a very futuristic setting, something neither character did. I'd posit that in both cases, the covers were not originally supposed to be either character, just a pair of generic unused covers. Possibly for a character that didn't make it to the books. It's possible that the second cover did have a few last minute revisions: colors changed and the character's mace swapped out for a gun (hence he's clubbing someone with it) in order to make it appear like a different character from the first issue ie the Phantom Bullet.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 26 May 2008 at 6:00pm
|
As usual, you're the mack, Ed.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 27 May 2008 at 3:52pm
|
I ran across this...I may have asked about it before. Has anyone read this work and what'd they think of it?
Apparently it's two mini-series, seperated by a few years. The concept is pretty solid, with a black American Pulp Hero in the 1930s fighting Nazis, but what about execution?




|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 29 May 2008 at 4:40pm
|
Preview up of AVENGERS/INVADERS issue 2: http://comicbookresources.com/?page=preview&id=361&d isp=table - http://comicbookresources.com/?page=preview&id=361&d isp=table

"Hey, this dame's bullet-proof!" I like the tone with Bucky here. He's a 1940s teenager and a little tough guy to boot.
Also, I'm really enjoying Steve Sadowski's Human Torch. There's always been a freaky, inhuman quality to the Torch of the 1940s, and the Sad Man gets it right down to the way he draws the fireballs.
And I really, really, really hate Tony Stark. I mean, I never liked Stark, but I despise the character, the armor, the attitude...Tony Stark needs to die by Cap's hand, that's the only way I'll ever be happy.
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 29 May 2008 at 4:44pm
|
Steve Sadowski's art is what makes AVENGERS/INVADERS work for me. He's able to do a Golden Age feel to the art while keeping it modern.
If Marvel ever decides to give another INVADERS series a shot, whether its modern or WWII era, he should be at the top of their list.
-------------
|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 29 May 2008 at 4:51pm
Are those ankle wings on Namora in the cover up top? I didn't think she had
them!
|
Posted By: Stephen Sadowski
Date Posted: 29 May 2008 at 5:01pm
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 29 May 2008 at 5:03pm
Torch and Toro don't work for me. I like the classic simplified versions.
Moreso, I liked how the FF Torch was consistant with the way the two
were drawn, yet there were minor differences that you could always tell
who's who. But, in this I cannot really tell the Human Torch apart from
Toro other than dialogue.
I would expect that the characters might say something about how all of
their foes could fly. In the GA up to the 70's, a character flying was a bit
of a novelty and that alone qualified for being significantly special. Of the
Invaders, a team created in the '70s, only about half of them could fly and
their enemies usually could not. Most of your 60s teams, not so much.
The X-Men had Angel. The JLA had Superman, Martian Manhunter and
Green Lantern (Wonder Woman under special conditions). The FF had
Human Torch. Doom Patrol, Negative Man. Avengers sorta had Thor. Ant-
Man and Wasp if they rode flying ants. Nowadays, it's taken for granted.
But, it shouldn't have been by the Invaders where super-powered folks
were still bit of a rarity.
And of course we have formerly acrobatic and scrapper Bucky going first
to using a gun to try and mow down the enemy. For that, I blame
Brubaker's retcons of the character.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 29 May 2008 at 6:18pm
|
I was checking out some YOUNG ALLIES covers recently, Ed. Though Buck doesn't use a Tommy Gun so often there as he does on the CAPTAIN AMERICA COMICS covers, he's using a variety of brutal weapons, including a mace and a sword, and a flame thrower.
 

As with the gun, how often did Bucky use such weapons inside the comics themselves? I just wonder how Brubaker's (or whoever's) conceit works with the content against the potential "representative" image of the cover. A lot of Golden Age covers seem symbolic than literal.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 29 May 2008 at 6:28pm
|
As far as the Torch, I feel like the Sadowski art gets that "liquid" quality to the early Torch, like he's walking napalm or something. And Kirby's version had that as well, from FF ANNUAL 4

Though I get what you're saying too. A lot of art in the 1940s shows the Torch kind of like a flaming coal, faceless under the heat intensity, but very defined too, at least by the covers.
By the way, I loved and still treasure that story of Torch vs Torch, but there was something kind of dismissive about it too. When I read it now, knowing the history a little better, it's really a pretty ignominous "death" for the android. The once-hero is reduced to being a mind-controlled slave, and then slain on the spot by Quasimodo for resisting. This could be the first instance of a Golden Ager being "used and abused" by the hot "star" of the time, Stan Lee. Roy Thomas must have been absolutely mortified.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 29 May 2008 at 6:33pm
|
Toro also seems more...adult in the Sadowski art. He's way more an actual boy, like Bucky seemed to be, in the Golden Age.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 29 May 2008 at 8:01pm
I agree, the covers often had Bucky and others using guns. However, they also showed Captain America using machine guns and Namor carrying bombs. Captain America was no goody-goody two shoes inside either, willing to let an enemy drown without lifting a finger to save him and thinking it's better that way. While Bucky occasionally used a gun inside the book, it was definitely not s.o.p. And over the course of how the character was portrayed in the modern Marvel U. for the 40 years leading up to Bru's run on the title, it is out-of character. Since Bucky's revival, the majority of the new stories I've seen with the character set in the past has been with him using lethal force first, not last and almost always using a gun. What was a small aspect of the character in appearances over 60 years ago seen by only a small handful of people is now the defining default characteristic.
The Torch wouldn't bother me as much if there was some slight but noticeable difference in the way Toro was rendered. While it seems to be taking cue from Marvel Comics #1 to a degree, it strikes me as being off-model as opposed to just artistic license, considering for 60 years their looks were for the most part very consistent regardless of the artistic style being Burgos, Buscema, Kane, Kirby, Kuperberg, or Robbins. It's like debating whether the current scaley look to Cap's tunic is artistic license or an actual retcon to the costume he wears. I say the latter. If for no other reason, the way it is now depicted, the cliffhanger ending of Stern & Byrne's Captain America with Baron Blood doesn't work with the rendition of the costume.
It's all like seeing the Whizzer being brought back and wearing the costume
with the cape and every story set in the past is now with him in that
costume. Or if Captain America in these pages was using the triangular
shield. Or if Superman started wearing the laced up boots and more triangular emblem acting as if it's been his look all along. The looks aren't totally out of left field, there are some precedents for them. But, it's still against the established norm of the characters' portrayals up to now.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 30 May 2008 at 8:09pm
|
I have to say, I'm getting a little underwhelmed by PROJECT SUPERPOWERS, as I'd already given up for the most part on THE TWELVE (though I never expected that to alter from my initial reaction to JMS being involved).
The problem is there's seemingly a lot happening, but nothing is actually happening. This wouldn't be so bad--Roy Thomas' ALL-STAR SQUADRON comics often had the sense of characters reliving huge portions of their extensive histories, which gave you a lot of action and lengthened fairly simplistic main plots.
In PROJECT, you're not even getting a historical perspective, though Samson gets a little backstory. Everyone else has kind of just appeared out of the ether, literally, without a single prime moment to appreciate who and what they are outside of their visuals and their current motives.
I can't, or don't, get what's going on. Jim Kruger has to be at fault here. He's the writer of record, but the scripts all seem so sparse that PROJECT reads like one of those He-Man mini-comics that used to come out with the toys in the early 80s. Those might actually have more story-telling behind them unfortunately.
I feel like a massive opportunity is still being lost.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 06 June 2008 at 10:11am
|

Chris Mills and Joe Staton (still kicking). Anyone reading FEMME NOIR? I haven't even run across it at the CS I don't think.
|
Posted By: Michael Myers
Date Posted: 06 June 2008 at 10:43am
|
Staton, wow. 'Can't help with Femme Noir, but it's nice to be reminded that Joe Staton is still around.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 06 June 2008 at 10:50am
As far as I know, Femme Noir is web comic only. But it's a good one, would love to see it in actual hard form. Staton does a great job.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 06 June 2008 at 7:46pm
|
Actually, FEMME NOIR has gravitated to hard form:
http://www.femme-noir.com/ - http://www.femme-noir.com/
It looks like Ape Entertainment is releasing the books. And yes, I'm amazed Joe Staton is still around.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 06 June 2008 at 7:55pm
|
I just can't help putting Tom Floyd's site up http://www.captainspectre.com/index.html - http://www.captainspectre.com/index.html to emphasize everybody should be reading the astoundingly cool "Captain Spectre" comics on his website. I'm totally getting the Cap Spectre sew-on patch.

Go to the site for a Lightning Legion membership card!


Love this site! Pimp it!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 06 June 2008 at 8:05pm
|
I can't say I was ever the biggest Don Perlin fan around, but he was solid enough.
I found this thematically eye-popping piece on his gallery here, where I assume he still does commissions... http://www.comicartfans.com/GalleryDetail.asp?GCat=5759 - http://www.comicartfans.com/GalleryDetail.asp?GCat=5759
Gorgeous, especially the black and white. Look at that slick line work, which is lost in color, but the color rocks as well.


|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 06 June 2008 at 8:08pm
|
Also, I have no idea, but a fantastic rendition of this guy: DR. TOMORROW!

He's pretty much the epitome of everything this thread is about. Is this a character that's been published or merely a Don Perlin idea?
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 06 June 2008 at 8:09pm
|
A lovely Phantom Lady...holy cow. Another comicartfans scan.

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 06 June 2008 at 8:12pm
|
Our boy, Sad Man Sadowski's sketch as well:

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 06 June 2008 at 8:15pm
|
A fabulous Paul Smith Rocketeer (I had to "adjust" the image, sorry...sweater puppets exposed)

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 06 June 2008 at 8:17pm
|
And a nice, odd, cool piece by Bob Layton, of the Robert Crane Robotman!

|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 07 June 2008 at 12:03am
Hey, that's my brother's Robotman!
paging Ray Kryssing...
My bro collects Golden age character commissions, and we figured Layton was good for all things metallic...
strange computer consol background for a ww2 character. Oh well...
Don Perlin does do really nice pencil commissions!
Really really nice!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 07 June 2008 at 8:02pm
|
paging Ray Kryssing...My bro collects Golden age character commissions
Runs in the family, Dave, obviously. Thank Ray for scanning it. I feel like we're all lucky to see these awesome commissions and art find their way online, so everybody has a chance to enjoy them.
Plus, there's other fans of these relatively unknown characters out there, and it's always neat to see that love made so explicit.
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 07 June 2008 at 11:05pm
uh...
The Ray comment was a joke referring to another thread. Ray's an inker who
likes to trace Layton commission art and pass it off as his own...
Fun thread. Let's bring it back!
kidding. Please don't.
|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 08 June 2008 at 6:07am
|
That's a niiice B&W Phantom drawing.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 08 June 2008 at 8:50am
|
Oh. Thank your brother and Ray Kryssing burns in hell!
Dave, any irons in the fire by the way for Moonstone?
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 09 June 2008 at 5:54pm
Doctor Tomorrow was an interesting concept for a mini-series. The hero starts in the 40's, each issue covers a different era in comics and done in a style that was similar to that era. Although when it reached the Silver-Age and they decided to ape Gil Kane, seemed a bit stupid to have an artist drawing in Kane's style while Kane was still around.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 09 June 2008 at 6:23pm
|
Thanks again for info, Ed. Did you read CAPTAIN GRAVITY, either iteration, by the by?
Here's some choice covers from DR. TOMORROW...

Butch Guice

The after-mentioned Gil Kane.

The Mike Mignola.
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 09 June 2008 at 7:16pm
Hey Chad-
I've just got the Kolchak covers and the Avenger book. After that, I'm afraid
my Moonstone irons are gonna be retired for a while. No time to draw on
the cheap when there's a baby in the house...
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 09 June 2008 at 9:01pm
|
Good for you, Dave (family man), bad for the rest of us.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 09 June 2008 at 9:05pm
|
I wanted to shill Francesco Francavilla's webspot http://pulpsunday.blogspot.com/ - http://pulpsunday.blogspot.com/
Francavilla seems like a pretty cool guy, with a huge affection for Pulp. There's some nice "lobby cards" from the Shadow radio programs, created by Francavilla. Wicked!

Francavilla is currently drawing the new ZORRO comics.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 09 June 2008 at 9:08pm
|
While scouting about, ran across another of these series with strong Pulp Hero inherents.



The series ran for 8 issues in 1988, from Malibu.
Anyone ever check it out?
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 15 June 2008 at 9:55pm
|
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=16798 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=16798
New Pulp Hero type series, striking close to home for me (I guess there's no quantifying the exact number of unusually-colored men of action there are out there, from the Avenger on up):

|
Posted By: Michael Myers
Date Posted: 24 June 2008 at 9:26pm
A new--to me, at least--home for PulpGallery.com:
http://picasaweb.google.com/pulpgallery - The Pulp Gallery

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 25 June 2008 at 7:12pm
|
Fabulous resource! Thanks so much, Michael.

|
Posted By: Michael Arndt
Date Posted: 25 June 2008 at 7:45pm
|
Was at a Borders last weekend and picked up my first Doc Savage novel. It contains this story.

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 26 June 2008 at 7:15pm
|
Here's something I found I didn't know existed. Anyone ever read this?



Jerry Ordway draws a very Pulp-inspired hero. http://cdn3.libsyn.com/wordballoon/WBflash2.mp3?nvb=200 80627011323&nva=20080628011323&t=075484517c1251bd985 f5 - http://cdn3.libsyn.com/wordballoon/WBflash2.mp3?nvb=20080627 011323&nva=20080628011323&t=075484517c1251bd985f5
|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 26 June 2008 at 9:26pm
I've got three issues of RED MENACE. Jerry Ordway's artwork is a nice as
ever.
|
Posted By: Michael Myers
Date Posted: 29 June 2008 at 11:31am
Cool pick up, Michael.
Thomas Cummins, over in his "Favorite unpopular or short-lived" thread, reminded me of these two issues of Howard Chaykin's The Scorpion:


|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 29 June 2008 at 6:43pm
|
I have issue one. I guess the character design at least made it to DOMINIC FORTUNE in the late 1970s.

Which I owned, back when I was a kid. I don't really remember the draw of it, but it was solid enough.
Colored badly is the later "revival" of the character here:
\
which I bought and loved. Apparently Chaykin's creation was given his final adventure without Chaykin being anywhere involved. He's a geriatric in this story, but I thought he was cool.

Never read this one or the Iron Man appearance, which I didn't know existed.
And then there's this miniseries I think I heard about but didn't even realized Dom was involved...

As recent as 2006 no less.
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 29 June 2008 at 8:57pm
So, I guess WW Chicago's news is that Dynamite is going to do Phantom
comics.
...and that it came as a surprise to Moonstone.
I'm curious as to what the story is on this.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 30 June 2008 at 8:24am
|
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17005 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17005
Pretty interesting. I'm a little scared by the Alex Ross involvement, but it doesn't sound like these guys intend on "updating" the Phantom as they've done the public domain characters.
Dave, you should send a resume. Moonstone might pay beans, but maybe Dynamite pays more? They need you on this thing.
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 30 June 2008 at 9:15am
Chad- what a nice thing to say!
Unfortunately, the comic industry is not for me right now, as the commercial art/advertising/licensing world tends to pay better then the comics world, and I've missed my years of dues paying to make a break in comics.
I talked to an editor at DC and when it got to the whole "send us your sequential sapmles" part of the conversation I thought "yeah, that ain't gonna happen". I'd possibly do more covers, if offered. I still debate giving it a shot doing interiors. maybe one day! The only interiors that I've done were done very quickly (2 hours a page?), and looked like it. I'd love to see what it would take to do something that I'd be proud of, both in a more realistic style as well as a cartooned/graphic style. I tend to be pretty fast with the pencil, so who knows? it might be do-able. I just don't have a free week to whip up samples. Or the extreme desire to do it...
Alas, my hopes of being both Alex Ross and Darwyn Cooke will have to wait til retirement (I hope)...
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 30 June 2008 at 12:36pm
Sable & Fortune was an interesting mini, up to the last issue. Overall it was marred in that it never tells you who the new Dominic Fortune is or his relation to the original. It's ok to set it up as a mystery and reveal just a little bit, but as far as I know, they never did.
The biggest flaw is the final issue. After several issues of being a fairly good painted comic and promoted as such, the final issue had very spare line art. Such an abrupt change and personally I thought it was ugly to boot, that I felt like mailing the whole mini to Marvel asking for my money back as I felt I like a victim of bait and switch. I wouldn't have bought the earlier issues if I had known that was going to be the art in the final issue. Even if they felt the need to switch artists, an effort should have been made to find someone with at least a comparable style, even if not painted. I couldn't ever bring myself to even read that last issue.
Dynamite taking over the Phantom: Hate to see this. Moonstone's take had been steadily improving and settled into a consistant quality read. Dynamite hasn't really knocked my shoes off with any of their titles so far. Zorro has been decent but owes too much to Isabel Allende's novel. Their whole thing about turning him into a NY crime-fighter if read correctly, is sorta like using the Bucky toting guns on GA covers argument, taking what is a minor footnote in the overall history and importance of a character and grossly magnifying its importance and role. And the whole thing about their making the character "modern" sends shudders down my spine. It's as if they think the character has been frozen in the 1940's and just a period piece when he's stayed modern and up to date as much as any comic strip and superhero characters have.
Meanwhile, in India I was looking for some Indian superhero comics, I saw one at the train station but was in too much a hurry to stop. Stopped in a children's book-mart of all places and they had a bunc of Asterix, Tin-tin, Archie, some American superhero comics and a whole bunch of European Phantom comics! Bought several of them!

-------------
|
Posted By: Michael Myers
Date Posted: 30 June 2008 at 12:52pm
|
Welcome back, Ed...hope the trip was a blast! BTW, thanks for the rundown on the Fortune miniseries. I'd never heard of it before, either.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 30 June 2008 at 5:18pm
|
Ed, hope the trip was intriguing!
I think JB has mentioned that the best tales of Tarzan happened when he was removed from the jungle, placed in another environment, and then used his jungle skills to win out.
I don't know why there's so much emphasis from Dynamite about urban adventures with the Phantom, but certainly there could be some great ones. I never care much for characters remaining on their 'home turf", and it's cool to see Spider-Man in the Everglades, Aquaman in New York, the Shadow on Mars. I want to see the contrast of characters against all different types of environments, and how they deal with them.
The only problem I've had with Moonstone's Phantom product is wanting more per month. It kills me that the characters, like the Phantom or the Shadow, who could really benefit from a weekly comic by a host of talents, don't have them. Meanwhile, along with the seven other monthly comics with Superman and Batman in them at DC, you also get a TRINITY weekly. Why?
Why not take characters who aren't quite so popular and see what happens in a weekly...characters like the Phantom who can encompass all different types of stories from different people, and isn't dependent on continuity to work. Tarzan, Shadow, Doc Savage were all built like that, fully realized icons with a built-in "formula" for their stories. Even if the Shadow is on Mars, he still creeps around squashing bitter fruit, that's built in.
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 01 July 2008 at 12:16am
|
I have a couple of issues of the Frew Phantom series (which is from Australia), but haven't been able to find particular issues I've been after. I got the two I actually have off eBay. The Frew series is, for the most part, reprints of the newspaper strip.
As for the Moonstone series, I've only read one story and thought it was decent, But from what I've heard from a lot of hardcore Phantom fans he tends to rely on his guns way too much in the Moonstone series when compared to the newspaper strip.
-------------
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 01 July 2008 at 5:37am
The newspaper strip and a comic book has different storytelling requirements and the comic may not be hamstringed by the same restrictions and are paced differently. Comic books can up the action as they can have 2 pages to show a fight, that'd be almost 2 weeks worth in the strips. He has guns, so he uses them. He doesn't shoot to kill though and I don't really notice any more reliance on them than his use of his fists and taking advantage of his reputation as a ghost and Devil as a wolf. The last several issues have been building an epic storyline as it connects some past stories together. The comic strips are often a bit tame these days
I think it's fine that the Phantom has adventures in America. He's a global hero who follows threats everywhere. Despite that, most of his adventures still take place or are linked to his Africa. The article implies that their take is more of a hero who happened to start out of Africa but will mostly be in NY. That's fine for one story, but that shouldn't really be the theme of the character. Frankly, if they want to do that, they already are using a character whose motif is exactly that, the Holyoke Cat-man who had cameos in SUPERPOWERS. And the term "modernizing" the character just bothers me by what it implies. Since the character has always been a "modern" character other than the flashbacks to past Phantoms, I fear they mean something like DC's grim & gritty take on Space Ghost
The Frew comic I got doesn't appear to be a newspaper reprint, least not the Phantom story. The Mandrake back-up does though. The Phantom story is interesting in that it's of his great grand-father who helps out Edgar, a member of the Jungle Patrol who isn't really up to snuff. Shortly after, Edgar returns to the US to marry his sweet-heart and fictionalizes an account of his encounter with the Phantom as a story for the pulps. Of course, Edgar is Edgar Rice Burroughs and that story is "Tarzan of the Apes."
The other books I got were 4 volumes of a 15 volume set, that seems to be over-sized editions of reprints of the Frew stories, 2 per volume. Haven't read those yet.
-------------
|
Posted By: Victor Rodgers
Date Posted: 01 July 2008 at 5:59am
Getting mighty sick of the Twelve. The issue when Laughing Mask was arrested was the final straw. Stracynski fails at the concept of goverment immunity. If the goverment grants them immunity to law enforcement sets them up in a posh mansion, with the idea of using them for good PR. Do you really think they are going to permit a local rinky dink NYC police precient to arrest Laughing Mask over a gangster that was murdered over fifty years ago? I mean come on. Following what has been established the feds get him a full pardon before he is even processed.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 01 July 2008 at 6:15am
|
I had been doing reviews of each issue of "The Twelve" on my blog as they came out, but I gave it up after the fifth issue. The reviews were all basically the same!
Each month the "Twelve" stand around and talk about each other, then there are one of two pages of a couple of the active "heroes" participating in some limited action. Then, the rest of the issue is primarily devoted to revealing major character flaws of these supposedly "better" more "heroic" suvrvivors of the golden age.
I'm morbidly curious about where the series goes, but everything that Stracynzski has done so far could have been handled within the pages of a single issue back in the silver or bronze age days of the House of Ideas and we would still have been treated to plenty of slam-bang super-heroic battles.
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 01 July 2008 at 7:53am
I feel your pain Chuck. I hadn't reviewed the most recent issue, because I got it as I was leaving town. THE TWELVE has an interesting dichotomy for me. It's both written badly and well. The page where the Phantom Reporter has writer's block. It does a great job at communicating that. However, it takes a whole page when it could have taken just a few panels. This is where decompressed story-telling is bad for comics, the whole mini has been decompressed, not just this one page and it gives the story a plodding feel. We have pages and pages telling the stories in a very passive manner, all designed to show us how pathetic the various characters are, each in their own way. Such writing is as two-dimensional writing as any comic where the heroes are just generic good-guys.
The story of Rockman's origin is poignant, but it completely re-writes the history of the character into being something completely different than he was before. And any future growth of the character out of this is basically stone-walled as the decision is made not to tell the character the truth. So, the conflict that was set up for the character is basically nullified. So, why make that change? It plants a conflict/emotional context in the readers' heads, but the conflict doesn't really exist on the paper.
JMS writes great scenes, but the structure of his overall storytelling and the decisions that lead to the scenes are greatly flawed. There's good stuff, but the whole things needs another revision or two to tighten up the writing and storytelling. There shouldn't have been a flash forward cliffhanger to the end of the book hinting at the ultimate plot in issues 1-2 if it wasn't going to be followed up on in the subsequent issues. Bad structure. Like the first issue of where we have superheroes being part of the invasion of Berlin and we see the twelve walking through empty rooms and down staircases while the narration tells us how good the various characters are at their powers and such. It flows very well, the words give a good voice-over and feel. However, this is a superhero comic book and he's just told the scene in about the most boring and passive manner possible. As if he doesn't want the visuals to detract from him wowing us and recognizing him as a great wordsmith.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 01 July 2008 at 3:29pm
|
About the most interesting stuff in THE TWELVE has occured with the Phantom Reporter, as mentioned. I dig that he's slowly being drawn to the succubus of the Black Widow. That's good old classic horror stuff.
I just don't see any point whatsoever in THE TWELVE. But where the focus is muddled at best, SUPERPOWERS has just slain me with ineptitude. The art isn't bad, but it doesn't strike anything in me. Jim Krueger is the source of my problem...is it so hard to, I don't know, TELL US WHAT THE F**K IS GOING ON? I feel like he's scribbling drunken notes on the back of beer coasters at his favorite Ruby Tuesday and handing those in for assignment. And I keep hearing reviewers talking about how well-done it is...and yet I find nothing to enjoy really, no awesome moment, no head-slapping coolness. Someone mentioned the great ATOMIC ROBO...it has resonance, the action is kinetic, there's a story, there's menace, there's nuance in the art that gives you insight into Robo's character.
In SUPERPOWERS, there's barely any of that. I don't care one whit about ANY of the characters I've encountered. If I sound angry, it's because I've been let down...this series should have knocked our d**ks in the dirt. Instead I'm more pissed off that most of the folks who listed the red flags (Alex Ross, "modernization", WATCHMEN overtones) have turned out to be right. I argued that surely the talent was more aware than that...
BUT I WAS WRONG.
I expected THE TWELVE to kind of...meander, with JMS involved. I was afraid of SUPERPOWERS but felt after the preview issue that there might be something interesting happening...
BUT THERE ISN'T.
I'm tired of drinking piss and being told it's Country Time Goddamn Lemonade!
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 01 July 2008 at 5:01pm
I heartily agree with you Chad. Both books make substantial changes to the original characters, but I have to give JMS credit that he at least does so in very moving vignettes that clearly establish the characters and he seems to be laying down some groundwork for conflict that flows from the characters. SUPERPOWERS makes sweeping changes to the characters but doesn't bother to really define any of them, as if Krueger expects all readers to be as familiar with these characters as they are the Justice League or Captain America so he doesn't have to be bothered with explaining who they are. To the point it's confusing as to whether such changes are plot points or just convenient retcons. I know the characters are different, but then I've spent a lot of time reading and researching golden-age superhero comics.
There seemed to be more story going into SUPERPOWERS than THE TWELVE, but it been de-railed by mindless conflict of hero vs. hero and trying to bring a couple more heroes into the present with each issue. One thing both have in common is that there seem to be too many characters for the writers to juggle effectively at their skill level. THE TWELVE would be better off if they compressed several of the characters. The Phantom Reporter, Mr. E, Laughing Mask, the Witness could fairly easily be combined into one or two characters, and thus giving a few characters a richer background/backstory. Fiery Mask and Electro are so far a non-entities, don't really need them with Captain Wonder, Dynamic Man and Rockman around. Likewise, Mastermind Excello's role so far could easily be folded into the Witness character.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 01 July 2008 at 5:45pm
|
True enough, Ed, about THE TWELVE.
I just don't get why we need THE TWELVE at Marvel. There's too many characters already, and then they dig up twelve more. Shouldn't this be a, uh, whatever Ultimate something or other? JMS shows folks reacting to Dynamic Man carrying a car in the MU as if they've never seen that before. This is Astro City here, folks! You can't throw a rock and not hit a superhero!
What THE TWELVE should have done, was to use the non-superpowered (or at least, low-superpowered) characters like the Phantom Reporter, Laughing Mask and the Witness as representative of the world BEFORE superheroes arrived. Use them for contrast...use the Laughing Mask's viciousness and link it to the Avengers to say, "You keep heading in this direction, and you're gonna be murderers." And the Mask wants that kind of justice, wants to "corrupt" the Avengers or Spider-Man or whoever to take an even more hardline stance, while others of the group certainly wouldn't.
See, now that kind of comic I'd really be interested in.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 02 July 2008 at 10:07pm
|
Okay, I read a pretty nice one and done 80 page Pulp Hero comic that I really enjoyed:

Brian Bolland cover. But the real treat is the Eduardo Barreto art. Barreto do no wrong for me. I adore the man's work, and he's always involved in great looking comics, not to mention one of my favorite series of all time, THE SHADOW STRIKES!
This is a good Pulp story with a Spider-inspired character who, previously during the years leading up to WW 2 is the son of double-dealing arms manufacturer who is selling to the Nazis. During a wine-and-dine session in Germany, Ben Vanderslice is experimented on by Nazi super scientists and comes out with a machine gun hand that is connected to his nervous system, a living part of him. This character, in the "modern" 1970s in which the story takes place, is a Senator trying to force an act of Congress to remove guns from the hands of anyone who isn't law enforcement or military. Mr. Machine Gun, his alias, is a Pulp Hero identity who eventually starts to perceive the gun is not only part of him, but has a "life" of its own, forcing him to hunt down and destroy criminals in the most brutal way possible.
I loved this thing. I enjoyed everything about it. Almost like reading a 1970s Charlton Comic, but never straying into any "post-modern" crap with a master like Barreto handling art. He nails the tone of the piece and gives Chabon the solid workman's comic imagery to enforce the script. It's a natural, enjoyable book with a good, solid, and Pulpishly weird protagonist and plot-hook.
Plus, I must say again, it's an actual story, told well, in one shot. Not only is it worth every dime, it's a rare beauty in today's comics.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 04 July 2008 at 1:38pm
|
Linked with Tom Floyd's great Doc Spectre site...
http://ghostzero.com/ - http://ghostzero.com/

The coolest part about this is you can follow the gradual ascension of Dave's idea for this character and comic from inception from practically day one. Fantastic design for his main character.
People who keep the Pulps alive and well are doing the lord's work.

|
Posted By: Flavio Sapha
Date Posted: 04 July 2008 at 1:48pm
I just don't get why we need THE TWELVE at Marvel. There's too many characters already, and then they dig up twelve more. +++
I must be clairvoyant. Knew all that before the book hit the shelves.
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 04 July 2008 at 2:10pm
We need the Twelve to give Chris Weston a paycheck. That man is freakin'
awesome and deserves as much work as he can take...
so there.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 04 July 2008 at 2:21pm
|
I would love to see Weston doing more straight up Pulp work. His style seems much more suited for something like that than men in tights.
|
Posted By: Flavio Sapha
Date Posted: 04 July 2008 at 3:40pm
|
Big Chris Weston fan here. He was very impressive in THE INVISIBLES and LEGENDS OF THE DARK KNIGHT. I would love to get a JAMES BOND comic from him.
|
Posted By: Flavio Sapha
Date Posted: 04 July 2008 at 3:42pm
His style seems much more suited for something like that than men in tights. +++ Then again, it fits the current zeitgeist to get a realistic artist showing men in tights looking slightly ridiculous.
|
Posted By: Joe Zhang
Date Posted: 04 July 2008 at 4:24pm
|
Neat look for Ghost Zero, but does a literal skull really need a skull-mask?
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 04 July 2008 at 6:04pm
|
Mayhap part of the mystery, Joe.
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 04 July 2008 at 8:35pm
|
The skull mask is to cover up his face when he's not Ghost Zero; the character is a ghost possessing a (willing) human body, and only looks like that when the ghost is in control.
-------------
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 04 July 2008 at 8:38pm
Check Chris Weston's log for his commissions and other art.
http://chrisweston.blogspot.com/
I bought a Doom Patrol commission from him last year, and it was awesome.
I got to meet him in New York this year and he's a really cool cat!
This commission of the Shadow just blew me away. I hope Chris doesn't
mind me posting it here, but it's a thing of beauty, and makes you dream of
what a Shadow book could be in his hands...
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 05 July 2008 at 11:12am
|
Like I say, the one thing I can see with Weston is a style more suited to Pulp. There's a grainy, tense quality with his work that I can enjoy.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 12 July 2008 at 10:41am
|
Preview of the new SOLOMON KANE up.
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17169 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17169
|
Posted By: Anthony Frail
Date Posted: 14 July 2008 at 11:37am
BTW, anyone here a fan of the Planetary series? A great twist on the pulp
hero concept.
|
Posted By: Michael Myers
Date Posted: 14 July 2008 at 2:11pm
The Solomon Kane comic? Ungh.
'Enjoyed Planetary, myself.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 14 July 2008 at 5:14pm
|
I enjoyed PLANETARY for the most part. Ellis kind of loses me with the "tough talk" but I did enjoy the fact that the original Pulp Heroes (as analogues) deafeated the JLA analogues head-tohead)
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 14 July 2008 at 5:19pm
|
I don't know if he will mind or not, but I'd just like for at least the guys who roam about in this thread to welcome Jason Armstrong as a new Forum member. This is the cat behind the great LOBSTER JOHNSON mini-series last year, FERRO CITY and DOC THUNDER (which I really want to get my hands on).


http://www.actionplanet.com/front/jason.html - http://www.actionplanet.com/front/jason.html
|
Posted By: Michael Arndt
Date Posted: 14 July 2008 at 5:43pm
|
Chad, I picked up the Lobster Johnson tpb on your recommendation. Got it today.Looking forward to reading it.
Also, welcome Jason Armstrong. Love the art in Lobster Johnson.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 15 July 2008 at 11:12am
|
Michael, I hope you enjoy IRON PROMETHEUS. It's an odd experience, and sets up a nice mystery for the Claw.
The one thing I hope never happens is Lobster Johnson's "origin". For god's sake, the power of this character is you're not sure who, or what, he really is. Or if he even truly exists!
I hope also that the trade has the great "text pieces" written about the Claw, supposedly talking about his Pulp background and American B-movie and Mexican films based on the character, done by the great Guy Davis!

|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 15 July 2008 at 11:34am
|
Welcome, Jason. I like that first little image that Chad posted. Neat! That Guy Davis-drawn LOBSTER JOHNSON cover makes me want to go buy the book.
|
Posted By: Anthony Frail
Date Posted: 15 July 2008 at 12:29pm
|
Welcome, Jason. I don't usually buy the Hellboy spin-offs, as I'm mainly a fan of Hellboy's world for the Mignola art.
However, I did faithfully collect the Lobster Johnson mini-series you did, mostly for your wonderful rendition of the character.
|
Posted By: Anthony Frail
Date Posted: 17 July 2008 at 10:01am
|
BTW, even though he first appeared in the comics, would you guys consider the Batman a pulp hero?
He seems to be a mash of Zorro, Doc Savage and the Shadow but he's transcended them all in popularity.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 17 July 2008 at 11:57am
Batman is very much in the tradition of the pulp heroes. But, he's also primarily a comicbook hero. A chief difference in the two is the role of the costume.
Batman wears tights. He wears a costume that is designed to look good as artwork, not just on the printed page. His costume has to look good in a fight because his fights are visual. The Spider had a very horrifying look on the printed page, it's not how he was traditionally drawn or presented on the covers however where he's just a masked man. But, the Spider also only wore that look sparingly. The costume for the pulp heroes was often only one small part of the arsenal of the hero, used in specific cases, less important than a good talent at disguise. The pulp heroes had distinctive looks, but if and when they had costumes, they tended to be for more practical concerns and to add to the mystique of the hero. Despite unique skin coloring, Doc Savage and the Avenger still wore street clothes and spent a good amount of time trying to fit in. Most pulp heroes used disguises more than they did costumes.
There are a few exceptions of course. The Black Bat, Crimson Clown and the Moon Man had very distinctive costumed looks and were a big part of their hook. All three were actively sought by the Law, the latter two being actual rogue heroes, heroes who committed crimes for the causes of Justice. Thus their distinctive looks played an extra role in the stories, caught with the costume could spell doom for their careers (even the Spider who was sought by the law and criminals, his costume rarely was seen as something that could compromise him). Also, should be noted that the Black Bat came out after Superman, right at the same time as Batman himself. Even so, he eventually dropped the costume.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 18 July 2008 at 4:46pm
|
It's interesting that the Pulps often seem more grounded in a practical reality than the superhero comics. Costumes sell Superheroes, but in the Pulps it was the functionality of the character. I'd never thought much about how the Pulp Heroes, even as bizarre as they often were in appearance, could "fake it" if necessary, using disguises or dressing another in their "uniform" in order to escape. For Spider-Man or Batman to do that requires much more of a suspension of belief...the complication of "costume" and its garish intricacies restricts the diversity of the Superhero story to become another TYPE of story; at the same time, the costume creates a unique dynamic of its own, perhaps more psychological than functional, and thus specific to its own rules.
I prefer the Pulp Hero, which I argue is what guys like Morrison, Ellis, and the movies REALLY WANT. They don't want superheroes, they want the affectation of Pulp Heroes without fully committing to Pulp: devoid of costumes, ethically variant or compromised, yet still with powers, modernization of Superheroes means becoming Episcopalian about picking and choosing aspects of the Pulp Hero and the Superhero, not committing to either. HELLBOY 2 is a Pulp Hero movie, proudly. IRON MAN is a Superhero movie, equally proudly. Both movies accept what they are and the "rules" of their genre, and they are successful at illustrating them.
It's not to say you cannot have a great mash-up of Superhero/Pulp Hero, as the two are more than kissing cousins. But I think a rhino is a rhino, already...and if forced to be an elephant, there's not a HUGE difference, but a rhino is still not an elephant. A is A.
Personally, I believe the costumed Superhero is far less interesting than the Pulp Hero from a story standpoint, unless the Superhero is allowed to call upon the same historical context as the Pulp Hero, who IS the past generally. The Superhero is almost completely dependent on their history...while the Pulp Hero stoically encompasses history itself, not reliant on anything but the plot.
Superheroes are either heroic or villainous, but Pulp Heroes are emblems and therefore removed from "continuity". You could establish a new Sherlock Holmes series and never once touch on Riesenbach Falls. But Spider-Man will forever till the earth where Gwen Stacy perished. Holmes wasn't defined by his final duel with Moriarty, but Spider-Man certainly was shaped by Gwen's death. A Pulp Hero cannot encompass such personal tragedies, not directly; generally, the Pulp Hero's agents or the by-proxy narrator carries the emotional context of the stories. A Superhero's existence warrants empathy and connectivity, the very core of childhood development (in American society anyway).
I guess the difference between Pulp Hero and Superhero may lie in how an adult deals with tragedy and duty and honor and justice, and how a child does the same through wish fulfillment and imagination and dreams. It may seem too simple to label Pulp Heroes=adults, Superhero=children, and yet the best stories of the Pulp genre affect the adult sensibilities while the best Superhero tales do the same in the more youthful imagination.
Crushing Pulp adultification onto Superheroes has some bearing on the problems at hand with Superhero comics in general today. Whether consciously or not, most talented pros in the comics field are approaching them with the purpose of creating a "modern Pulp" devoid of everything unique about Pulp AND Superhero comics.
Which leaves what?
|
Posted By: Anthony Frail
Date Posted: 18 July 2008 at 10:13pm
I find it interesting that you consider Hellboy 2 a pulp film-- it feels like a
fantasy picture to me.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 20 July 2008 at 5:08pm
|
HELLBOY 2 derives a lot of impact from Pulp iconography, transferred onto Fantasy/mythological figures, as Mignola intended, I think.
Hellboy himself is a Pulp Hero. The story follows a lot of trappings of the Pulps, from mysterious villains of Hellboy's "world" encountering these Fantasy dwellers...so you could argue most of that is Fantasy Pulp, John Carter or Tarzan stuff. The Golden Army is great Pulp, the kind of thing Fu Manchu would have spent a great deal of time trying to discover.
|
Posted By: Anthony Frail
Date Posted: 20 July 2008 at 8:02pm
I see what you're saying, but it's got so much superhero stuff in it that I feel
it's as much of that genre as the pulp genre.
|
Posted By: Sergio Lopez
Date Posted: 20 July 2008 at 11:21pm
I wouldn't consider Hellboy II a pulp film -- more of a "dark fantasy" film, in my opinion -- but the comics most definitely are.
------------- For indie comics news, interviews, previews, and FREE comics (Savage Dragon, Desperate Times, True Story Swear to God, 40 Ounce Comics, A Touch of Silver, Tellos, etc.): www.comicbookgazette.com
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 31 July 2008 at 7:35pm
Posted By: Paul H. Kupperberg
Date Posted: 01 August 2008 at 9:09am
Dave sez: "So, I guess WW Chicago's news is that Dynamite is going to do Phantom
comics.
...and that it came as a surprise to Moonstone.
I'm curious as to what the story is on this."
I'm not sure of the entire story, but I've been doing some work for Moonstone recently (couple of prose stories--including for THE AVENGER CHRONICLE, speaking of pulp characters, some back-ups for CAPTAIN ACTION, including, still on the subject of pulps, a 6-page Fantomas, an early 20th century French noir/pulp feature, for #1, followed by 2 Cold War-era Cap stories): they're definitely continuing with Phantom. I've just had a Phantom story approved (about which I can't say much, except it's set during the Civil War and teams Phantom with Rhett Butler, for those of you that, ahem, give a damn) as part of a larger project.
There is precedence for a license being worked by 2 companies simultaneously; as I recall, in the 90s, Malibu published Star Trek: Deep Space 9 while DC was doing comics based on the other ST franchises.
------------- PK
http://kupperberg.blogspot.com/ - http://kupperberg.blogspot.com/
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 01 August 2008 at 2:22pm
Hey Paul-
I liked your Avenger story! Any idea when that book is going to see the light of day? The art for it was finished in January...
yikes! That crazy Joe G!
The best info that I've read is that any problem with the Phantom is being put off for 2 years. I guess we'll have to see what happens after that!
|
Posted By: Paul H. Kupperberg
Date Posted: 01 August 2008 at 2:33pm
Dave, Thanks--I had a great time writing it. The original Avenger books were, really, pretty lame, but I always loved the character...almost as much as the Spider! Was that you what did the illo for it (takes me forever to put 2 and 2 together!)? Nice piece! Last I heard, it's due out middle, late this month (Amazon has an August 20 pub date).
------------- PK
http://kupperberg.blogspot.com/ - http://kupperberg.blogspot.com/
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 01 August 2008 at 4:20pm
Yeah, I did those with my buddy Andy Bennett (who inked them). Always strange for me work with others, as I'm so used to taking care of things on my own. It was kinda fun for a change!
Yours was on a rollercoaster, if I remember correctly..
I pencilled them over a year ago. Yikes!
I look forward to seeing the book!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 01 August 2008 at 5:51pm
|
I had heard, I thought, talk of Moonstone producing some Spider comics? And what happened to the Spider and the Avenger versus Dracula by David Michelinie?
The new material, co-starring G-8 (written by Martin Powell)and then co-starring The Avenger!(by David Michelinie & Eddy Newell) will follow!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 01 August 2008 at 8:02pm
|
THanks to Anthony castrillo, I just got exposed to this character I didn't know about. Now I'd like to find out more.



Anyone read this stuff? There's apparently quite a bit of it, having been in like CREEPY magazine as a back-up.
|
Posted By: Paul H. Kupperberg
Date Posted: 01 August 2008 at 8:29pm
Chad sez:
"I had heard, I thought, talk of Moonstone producing some Spider comics?"
They did a Spider prose anthology--I missed out on that one, dagnabbit!
I REALLY wanted to write one of those. Don't know about the Michelinie
story, though.
------------- PK
http://kupperberg.blogspot.com/ - http://kupperberg.blogspot.com/
|
Posted By: Chuck Wells
Date Posted: 01 August 2008 at 10:08pm
|
Greetings and salutations to both Jason Armstrong & Paul Kupperberg.
Yeah, The Rook is great, Warren Magazines are starting to fetch premium prices on eBay (so grab 'em while you still can).
Dave, that Richard Henry Benson illo is pretty sweet!
------------- Life's tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid.
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 01 August 2008 at 10:56pm
Gee thanks, Chuck! Wait till you see the rest of them (PLEASE PLEASE BUY
THE BOOK!!!!!!)
Chad- you got's to remember that sometimes Moonstone's books take a
while. My buddy Andy Bennett's got a Sherlock Holmes/Kolchak mini-series
coming out this fall that he's been working on for years (the delay not being
his fault)... It's kinda become a running joke for us. I'm not sure what to
make fun of him for after the book comes out...
|
Posted By: Paul H. Kupperberg
Date Posted: 01 August 2008 at 11:09pm
Chuck sez: "Greetings and salutations to both Jason Armstrong & Paul Kupperberg."
Thanks, Chuck! Is Jason here? Where you hiding, Jason?
------------- PK
http://kupperberg.blogspot.com/ - http://kupperberg.blogspot.com/
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 03 August 2008 at 2:46pm
|
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17560 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17560
ATOMIC ROBO gets a nice little article. Now we're getting more Robo in the future, and I think that cannot be a bad thing.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 03 August 2008 at 2:53pm
|
http://thepulpfactory.blogspot.com/ - http://thepulpfactory.blogspot.com/
Don't know if I've pimped or otherwise mentioned this website, but it's a good place to discover some further talent out there investing in the Pulp Hero iconography.
|
Posted By: Andrew Hess
Date Posted: 03 August 2008 at 3:13pm
Missed Atomic Robo first time around, and even it's TPB release. I've gotta get it this week, it looks.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 10 August 2008 at 5:38pm
|
Pretty interesting variation on a theme, for sure:

http://www.newsarama.com/comics/080708-UrbanMyths.html - http://www.newsarama.com/comics/080708-UrbanMyths.html
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 13 August 2008 at 4:10pm
|
Looks like THE REVENANT is finally coming!
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17698 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17698
All in one shot too, which is even better.

Looks good. I'd love to see Dave Flora's GHOST ZERO http://ghostzero.com/ - http://ghostzero.com/ similarly find its way.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 13 August 2008 at 4:47pm
|
I have to post this beautiful Flora image...

|
Posted By: Andrew Hess
Date Posted: 21 August 2008 at 2:55pm
|
FINE-ally picked up Atomic Robo. Couldn't remember the title, so had to get a couple of clerks to help me out. Felt bad because I wasn't sure I was going to pick it up, but knew it was worth a look because of comments on the Forum here.
Glanced thru it and saw Carl Sagan! Immediate sale!
Any comic with a two-fisted robot and a speaking role with the late Carl Sagan is a must read! (...now to find the time to read it...)
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 21 August 2008 at 10:03pm
|
Just to address an irk with the only real critical point online I've read: ATOMIC ROBO is "familiar" in that it's ground Mike Mignola has tilled. You'll hear that a lot, but to me Robo is more directly related to Clark Savage Jr than to Hellboy. A "missing link" in a way. So don't let anybody piss on the parade...there's excellent comics like BRIT and ROBO operating in the same arena, and Hellboy doesn't corner the market.
ROBO is just plain good comics. And the new stories are arriving at some point, so good for us!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 31 August 2008 at 12:37pm
|
On http://pulpsunday.blogspot.com/ - http://pulpsunday.blogspot.com/ , Francesco Francavilla unleashes a great sketch of a character from BLACKSAD, http://www.comicbookbin.com/euro04.html - http://www.comicbookbin.com/euro04.html
I'd never heard of it, but this is a nice, nice piece:

Also included from last week is Francavilla's Captain America short strip story, which has a pretty nice little variation on Cap and a quick, solid little punch-line. Very fun.
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 01 September 2008 at 9:40am
|
Looks like THE REVENANT is finally coming!
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17698 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17698
All in one shot too, which is even better.
+++++++++++++++++++
About time, too. I remember when it was a comic posted on Komikwerks. If I remember right, the character was originally called The Spook. I'm guessing they got a c & d from DC because of the Batman villain by that name.
-------------
|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 01 September 2008 at 10:20am
|
Has anyone here read DOC WALLOPER? If so, what do you think?
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 01 September 2008 at 12:17pm
|
Haven't read it, Wallace. I was hoping to find it in a cheap trade. I like the idea, of course. Wish I had an oversize right hand, because brother I'd use it!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 07 September 2008 at 4:29pm
|
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17954 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17954

I dig the new El Diablo design. I'll pick this up for sure. Kind of has the whole Day of the Dead thing going, which makes sense. Plus I love characters who embody evil but are actually heroes.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 19 September 2008 at 4:27pm
|
Chris Mills posted the IDW art cards for Darwyn Cooke's PARKER adaptions.
http://gunsinthegutters.blogspot.com/ - http://gunsinthegutters.blogspot.com/

|
Posted By: Warren Leonhardt
Date Posted: 19 September 2008 at 4:37pm
Chad - thanks for all your work in maintaining this thread! Without it I wouldn't be aware of half of this stuff.
BTW, I think you're right. Most adult superhero readers really want a pulphero when it comes down to the core of it...amorality is just part of pulp sensibility. SIN CITY was a great example of how well it works with a modern audience. I know I'm picking up these PARKER books!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 19 September 2008 at 5:56pm
|
Thanks Warren. I really appreciate it.
By the way, for everyone, Dave Flora's GHOST ZERO looks to have a publisher (but it's not official on his blog, so I won't spill the beans here, except to say the most likely place for a Pulp Hero tale you can think of, publishing wise?) Even though it seems a done deal, I don't want to step on toes.
Suffice it to say, this is great, great news for Mr. Flora and his very cool, very innovative creation, Ghost Zero.
You can, of course, see more here: http://ghostzero.com/ - http://ghostzero.com/
And here is the beautiful sketch by Francesco Francavilla of the character seen upthread:

Love this character and wish Dave Flora all the luck in the world. And you cats buy his book when it comes out!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 27 September 2008 at 9:08pm
|
Met this guy at the Baltimore Con...Paul Conrad and his cool retro character, the Super Robot Monster!

http://superrobotmonster.com/ - http://superrobotmonster.com/
No publisher involved yet, but Conrad is a talented guy, and his SF Pulp Monster Hero is a pure throwback to the 1950s...I'm going to follow this developing character with interest! Nice damn guy too!
|
Posted By: Michael Myers
Date Posted: 28 September 2008 at 11:48am
|
Chad, thanks for the heads-up on the Ghost Zero progress!
|
Posted By: Andrew Hess
Date Posted: 28 September 2008 at 12:51pm
|
Just read "The Hunter" and "The Green Eagle Score."
(Fortunately our local library has several of the older Parker books still, tho they are in Large Print.)
Great little caper books. I'm eagerly waiting for Cooke's version of Westlake's stories, tho I have Lee Marvin in my head for the character and not Jack Palance as Westlake had envisioned Stark.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 29 September 2008 at 10:35am
|
By the way, check out the new EL DIABLO, which I picked up. The first issue is solid if introductory, as you'd expect, particularly from Hester's art.
Glad you had a chance to find the older Parker stuff, Andrew.
|
Posted By: Steve Ogden
Date Posted: 29 September 2008 at 11:45am
As anyone see the line of Golden Age reprints from Bill Black's AC Comics? If you not, you should do yourself a favor and do so. It is a labor of love for Bill Black to put out theses comics. He reprints some of the most obscure and not so obscure Golden Age heroes. He also puts out the excellent Best of the West. Which has some wonderful westerns of days gone by. Plus, some of issues also have articles and features about the Golden Age. Bill Black knows about old comics, serials and westerns. Here are some of his offerings:

|
Posted By: Darren De Vouge
Date Posted: 29 September 2008 at 12:13pm
|
"Hauted Horseman?"
That may almost be as good a title as "Ghost Rider".
|
Posted By: Lars Johansson
Date Posted: 29 September 2008 at 12:19pm
I have a Men of mystery. I like it, but it was more expensive than an entire Marvel Essential volume. I even got an email from Bill Black when I complained about that his site didn't work, then he emailed me and said that sure it worked. He later emailed again and said that it didn't work but that he didn't check.
-------------
|
Posted By: Steve Ogden
Date Posted: 29 September 2008 at 3:14pm
|
I know they are a bit pricey, Lars. Bill is actually losing on Men of Mystery. I buy both Best of the West and Men of Mystery every month. I think it is money well spent. The Essentials and DC Showcase are EXCELLENT in terms of value and content. But, for me Men of Mystery and Best of the West are just as valued because 99.9% of the time they contain stories that I have never read before and most like will never see. These type of stories and art would be long forgotten to readers today if we did not have comics like Men of Mystery and Best of the West.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 29 September 2008 at 3:18pm
|
Are these in color, Steve?
|
Posted By: Steve Ogden
Date Posted: 29 September 2008 at 3:25pm
|
<<"Hauted Horseman?"
That may almost be as good a title as "Ghost Rider".>> I do not know if you know this Darren but The Haunted Horseman is Ghost Rider; Ghost Rider is The Haunted Horseman. The original Ghost Rider was created by Vin Sullivan and Dick Ayers for Magazine Enterprises (ME) in 1949. But, now since Marvel has the copyright on Ghost Rider; the original Ghost Rider is now called the Haunted Horseman or The Haunter in these re-prints. Also, Dick Ayers will do some new stories for Bill Black and his Best of The West series.
|
Posted By: Steve Ogden
Date Posted: 29 September 2008 at 3:26pm
Are these in color, Steve?
No, Chad, they are in black and white on heavy paper.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 29 September 2008 at 3:34pm
|
Oh heck yeah, "The Haunter!" That's a great name for the character! I've been wondering where I might pick up those Dick Ayers stories. Thanks much, Steve.
I gotta believe these reprints are better constructed than ESSENTIALS for sure. SHOWCASE volumes are pretty sturdy, but ESSENTIALS do not have the same production values, IMO.
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 29 September 2008 at 5:00pm
One of the more annoying things about these reprints is that Bill Black "changes" things. I am of the mind that if you are going to reprint something and claim it's a reprint, it should be as close to the original material as possible.
I know why he changes the name of the character Ghost Rider to Haunted Horseman and I don't mind if he does that for purposes of the cover or for his modern version of the character. HOWEVER, in the reprints themselves, the name should be "Ghost Rider".
He's reprinted several Captain Midnight stories now, only he has changed the name to Major Midnight. In the Fawcett reprint, he swopped out the cameo by Captain Marvel Jr. with Mr. Scarlet. He also reprinted another story (again I think it was Captain Marvel Jr, but as he didn't give any details on the source material...) only swopping out the lead character with his Fighting American-ized Fighting Yank.
I don't mind the higher prices, all independent comics tend to cost more than ones from the big two and I've dropped so many other comics anyway. But, I view reprints being something along the lines of copies of historical documents and as such, should be as unchanged as possible. And if there are changes, they should be at least documented for the sake of reference.
-------------
|
Posted By: Darren De Vouge
Date Posted: 30 September 2008 at 12:03am
|
<<"Hauted Horseman?"
That may almost be as good a title as "Ghost Rider".>>
I do not know if you know this Darren but The Haunted Horseman is Ghost Rider; Ghost Rider is The Haunted Horseman.
The original Ghost Rider was created by Vin Sullivan and Dick Ayers for Magazine Enterprises (ME) in 1949. But, now since Marvel has the copyright on Ghost Rider; the original Ghost Rider is now called the Haunted Horseman or The Haunter in these re-prints.
****
Yeah, I know Steve. I was only joking.
I'm a big fan of that western Ghost Rider.
|
Posted By: Darren De Vouge
Date Posted: 30 September 2008 at 12:09am
|
This brings to mind how some obscure characters are deprived of their true names by copyright problems. Most of the time, the names that publishers have to substitute, don't really work as well as the original. I've noticed a few examples in the Project Superpowers mini:
The Fox Mystery Men version of Blue Beetle has become "Big Blue" (complete with quotes)
Catman has become "Cat"
Daredevil (Lev Gleason, Little Wise Guys version) has become "The Death Defying Devil" (Bleehh!!)
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 30 September 2008 at 6:39am
Except that's not how copyrights nor trademarks work.
If a work is public domain via copyright you are completely free to copy and sell and distribute a work, regardless of trademark status or later copyrights. If the Siegel and Shuster Superman stories ever go public domain, DC will still own the Superman character and the right to put out new stories and artwork with him. But it doesn't prevent anyone from reprinting the original stories even with the character completely recognizeable and called Superman.
Where it gets tricky is the trademark angle. What you cannot produce is a NEW Superman book with new art of Superman on the cover nor advertising. Although you could reproduce the cover faithfully (assuming that's pd as well). Gunnison did this when the pulp containing the first Tarzan novel went pd, even though the Burroughs estate still owns the trademarks. People have been doing it for years with the Fleischer Superman cartoons that became public domain through a loophole. Taking the Tarzan case, since that first (and probably a couple others by now) Tarzan stories are public domain, there's absolutely nothing the ERB estate could do if I started writing my own Tarzan stories or using Tarzan in my stories as long as I make sure it's derived solely from the public domain story (hence no Korak, living in some plantation like estate with Jane in Africa, etc) and I don't violate the trademarks by placing him or his name on the cover and advertisments.
SUPERPOWERS changes the name of the original Daredevil because they want to strengthen their hold on the trademark and copyright NOT because they legally have to. However, if the original Blue Beetle is public domain, then the law is free and clear for them to use him inside the story and in group shots, complete with his original name. If he's not, then changing the name doesn't change it from being a copyright violation one iota. DC might have more of a trademark case with Ross' re-design of the Scarab as it has none of the original character's elements in it and was similar enough to his re-design of the Ted Kord Blue Beetle in KINGDOM COME that readers thought this was a redesign of the original Blue Beetle. That is pretty much by definition of what trademarks are to protect against.
-------------
|
Posted By: Brian Floyd
Date Posted: 30 September 2008 at 7:15am
|
This brings to mind how some obscure characters are deprived of their true names by copyright problems. Most of the time, the names that publishers have to substitute, don't really work as well as the original. I've noticed a few examples in the Project Superpowers mini:
The Fox Mystery Men version of Blue Beetle has become "Big Blue" (complete with quotes)
Catman has become "Cat"
Daredevil (Lev Gleason, Little Wise Guys version) has become "The Death Defying Devil" (Bleehh!!)
+++++++++++++++
AC Comics used the original Daredevil for a bit and called him either Reddevil or Red Devil. I forget which.
-------------
|
Posted By: Steve Ogden
Date Posted: 30 September 2008 at 9:06am
|
I'm sorry Darren. You being here in this thread, I should have known better. I really enjoy the the Western Ghost Rider as well. I have two commissions by Dick Ayers of Ghost Rider.
|
Posted By: Steve Ogden
Date Posted: 30 September 2008 at 9:14am
I see what you are saying Ed. I am sure there are reasons that Bill Black has to make changes in those re-prints. I think it would be a lot easier for him to re-print the comics as is rather that going through each issue to make those certain changes. I am sure that are necessary.
|
Posted By: Michael Myers
Date Posted: 30 September 2008 at 9:18am
Big thanks for clarifying the copyright and trademark angles, Ed. I don't think I've ever understood the particular trademark angle as you covered it in the Tarzan example, and would have thought the character itself was protected.
|
Posted By: Steve Ogden
Date Posted: 30 September 2008 at 9:33am
Another wonderful comic was The Nevermen by Philip Amara and Guy Davis. It was a wonderful series. With wonderful characters and fantastic stories. The Nevermen were created/designed to defend their beloved Midnight City from villains and gangs alike; villinas named Winterbone and The Clockwork gangs like the League of Crows and the Radio Boys. The art of Guy Davis puts you in the 1930's. His spectacular cityscapes and eye for design of the 1930's and his imagination makes for a sensational read. Philip Amara dialog and characterzation is right on the money.
How can anyone not love this phrase from the inside fron cover of the second mini-series, "Streets of Blood"--Journey again to a time when the action was bold, evil seductive and the good guys wore suits.

|
Posted By: Darren De Vouge
Date Posted: 30 September 2008 at 10:32am
|
Are the Project Superpowers characters all in public domain? Does anyone here know for certain?
If so, does that mean I can start my own version of these characters, complete with their original names and avoid potential legal action?
Personally, I think the characters would be stronger with their original names. The renames mostly suck.
|
Posted By: Kevin Moorhead
Date Posted: 30 September 2008 at 10:40am
|
Darren, yes they are all in PD. Create away : ) The name changes come, I believe, from the desire to spin them off into their own series.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 30 September 2008 at 4:48pm
|
I haven't found THE NEVERMEN in totality and own one issue only, but it's surreal and cool. Guy Davis certainly covered some Pulpy Noir ground with NEVERMEN and SANDMAN MYSTERY THEATRE, which is probably one of the best (and longest) "period" series ever done. Amazing to think that SANDMAN MYSTERY THEATRE lasted as long as it did, set as it was in the late 1930s. Such is the claim that "period" comics never sell, and yet THE INVADERS sold (enough I presume) and SMT as well, for years.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 30 September 2008 at 4:55pm
|
I still want to use an idea for a series starring some of the public domainers...but I think it's hard to sell the PDers for stiffs like myself. Alex Ross or Erik Larsen wants to produce PD stories, people will buy it. I don't think readers are dying for Chad Carter's version of The Face.
Still, it's one of the things I'd like to do, as the PD characters are so accessible, and there's something to be said for getting folks interested in those artists' work. Alternately, my problem is I feel like I'm grave-robbing just a little.
Has anyone ever "continued" a discontinued character who had otherwise been forgotten or fell out of favor, and managed to both elevate the character and retain their own "identity"?
|
Posted By: Darren De Vouge
Date Posted: 30 September 2008 at 10:09pm
|
I'd do books with anthology-style titles to keep the names of the characters off the titles:
Mystery Men comics featuring Blue Beetle, etc.
It's worked for Action Comics for 70 years.
|
Posted By: Darren De Vouge
Date Posted: 30 September 2008 at 10:20pm
|
Alex Ross or Erik Larsen wants to produce PD stories, people will buy it. I don't think readers are dying for Chad Carter's version of The Face.
***
Don't be too sure. I'd rather see a version of the character that's true to its own tradition rather than one that gets changed around by some big creator's ego and the current whims of the marketplace.
|
Posted By: Kevin Moorhead
Date Posted: 30 September 2008 at 11:40pm
I'd do books with anthology-style titles to keep the names of the characters off the titles ----------------- I just like how that sounds. I miss those kind of Marvel Premiere, All-Star Comics, etc. comics. You've got one customer so far : )
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 02 October 2008 at 4:24pm
|
For gift-giving purposes:
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/2009-Pulp-Art-Wall-Calendar /Barnes-Noble/e/9781435102965/?itm=3&bnit=H - http://search.barnesandnoble.com/2009-Pulp-Art-Wall-Calendar /Barnes-Noble/e/9781435102965/?itm=3&bnit=H

I got last year's "Damsels in Distress" one for a gift and enjoyed it immensely. Still am!
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 03 October 2008 at 9:33pm
|
Congratulations to Dave Flora and his creation, Ghost Zero, as Dave makes an official announcement on his web presence http://ghostzero.com/ - http://ghostzero.com/

GZ will be appearing in the March release of Moonstone’s SPIDER novellas! The GZ story that will be appearing in this book will be the “Cast-Iron Coffin” short that you’ve been reading about earlier in the blog. Now, the SPIDER is my all-time favorite pulp hero, so I’m pretty flattered to have GZ “catching a ride” with such a great tribute to the character. You’ll be seeing a new GZ short in each of the SPIDER books coming out from Moonstone every other month, which means I’m going to be a pretty busy guy.
Folks, that's just great news for all of us, I think.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 05 October 2008 at 7:13pm
|
So I heard about this series with a "Ditko Question" type protagonist, at least in look, written by Joe Casey with art by Charlie Adlard. Former I know from GODLAND, latter from WALKING DEAD.

It's adult-themed and well-done. The story concerns this guy who is a bail-bondsman for super-villain types. Like Denny O'Neil's Question, the schlub here is addicted to fighting and inflicting pain, so much so that he seriously injures a "skip" and is denied pursuing criminals. So he puts on this barcode mask and pretends to be a bounty hunter for his own bond company.
Each story part is a bare few pages, mainly illustrating some ultra-violent moment that seems to become something else by the end. Nothing is really as straight-forward as it seems.
It's in black and white, like Adlard's other work, and visceral. I read the whole book in one sitting, very addictive itself.
There's stuff going on subtextually that elevates this book over some juvenile badass fest. There're elements of STARMAN and O'Neil's QUESTION and good Frank Miller and even a prose homage after each chapter to SANDMAN MYSTERY THEATRE.
So, I recommend it. I think I heard Image is reprinting the thing soon.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 17 October 2008 at 6:32pm
|
Check it out, folks...Dave Flora's own page on Moonstone Comics...
http://www.moonstonebooks.com/GZ.asp - http://www.moonstonebooks.com/GZ.asp
Very nice. Looks great. Can't wait.
|
Posted By: Warren Leonhardt
Date Posted: 17 October 2008 at 6:52pm
That's awesome news! I'll be looking out for that - thanks for the tipoff.
and as for this: "I don't think readers are dying for Chad Carter's version of The Face." ++ If it's good, you've got nothing to fear. Just go for it! The first few drafts might not be so hot, but stick to it! You've got some good ideas in that noggin, try 'em out.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 17 October 2008 at 7:00pm
|
Has anyone read RUSE? I guess Mark Waid started it, and Butch Guice seems to have done the bulk if not all of the 26 issues.

Looks like Mike Perkins is on this thing as well.
How I missed a Butch Guice drawn comic about a supernatural detective...I just don't know what to say. I'm ashamed.
|
Posted By: Troy Nunis
Date Posted: 17 October 2008 at 7:48pm
|
RUSE had wonderful art start to finish, but for me, it was highly disappointing in terms of the writing and there being any actual sleuthwork for the reader to follow/anticipate - more of a pseudo-victorian action/adventure than a detective series.
------------- I'm told that I love semantics, this is true -- depending on what you mean by love.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 19 October 2008 at 3:53pm
|
Keith Wilson has reproduced some Larry Bama DOC SAVAGE paperback covers to meld them with a fantasy line-up of famous movie monsters for Doc to battle.



These are pretty fun. Go here for the gallery, which gets updated as the guy makes'm. http://monsterverse.com/doc/ - http://monsterverse.com/doc/

|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 23 October 2008 at 6:01pm
|


http://www.comicspace.com/silver_comics/ - http://www.comicspace.com/silver_comics/
http://thesilvercomicsblog.blogspot.com/ - http://thesilvercomicsblog.blogspot.com/
For them interested in what is, admittedly, a more Silver Age approach in some respects, I submit the character "The End" in particular...Johnny Ortiz's nice Pulpy character, with WW 2-era stories of the cat at the top.
|
Posted By: Kevin Moorhead
Date Posted: 23 October 2008 at 7:46pm
I love those Doc Savage covers! I've seen some here and there but never knew he had a site. Thanks Chad!
|
Posted By: Wallace Sellars
Date Posted: 24 October 2008 at 11:35am
|
I have the first RUSE collection, but it didn't interest me enough to buy more.
|
Posted By: Paul Kimball
Date Posted: 25 October 2008 at 9:08pm
After hearing Chad Carter give them so many recommendations, I picked up
the first of the Parker novels today, will be starting it tomorrow.
-------------
|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 27 October 2008 at 4:07pm
Just reading Waid talking about doing RUSE was enough to make me decide against it as it was coming out. He admits that he doesn't like Doyle's Sherlock Holmes stories, that he felt they were cheats as far as mysteries go which seemed strange that he'd agree to do a comic that the setup is similar and it sounded like he agreed only so that he could do Holmes "right".
I got one of the small paperback size collections of the first arc or so, and wasn't at all impressed. It was too much into tying into the over-arcing continuity of the rest of the line with the Crossgen sigil, no real explanation or set-up as to the era being only Victorian-esque, with real magic and super-science; not at all capturing the feel and place of the times. It felt like a book that didn't really know what it was supposed to be and I think a big part of that was because it had a writer that didn't really appreciate on a basic level the genre at all that he was writing.
-------------
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 27 October 2008 at 4:44pm
|
Interesting as always, Ed.
|
Posted By: Chad Carter
Date Posted: 08 November 2008 at 12:08pm
|
Well, I'm confused, as I thought Moonstone lost their rights to the Phantom.
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=18740 - http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=18740
Does this mean Dynamite and Moonstone are both producing Phantom comics?
The big news is that David Michelinie is working as editor/consultant...though I'm not sure what that means, in general Michelinie involved in anything gets better far quicker than it gets worse.

|
Posted By: Ed Love
Date Posted: 08 November 2008 at 12:39pm
There was a lot of confusion over Dynamite revealing their plans for the Phantom. Basically, Moonstone's license had not expired and were at the time, in the middle of a storyline. There was a bit of name-calling back and forth and I still don't know how the confusion came about, whether the company was farming around with the idea of getting another publisher but at the same time not letting Moonstone know or if Dynamite was just confused over what they had agreed to. Thankfully, Dynamite eventually said they were not going to pursue it and Moonstone kept it.
That said, I'm not sold on the idea of a relaunch. It doesn't sound that bold of a new direction and they are keeping the same team they've had for the last year, all of which are good things in my opinion. The artist especially is one of the most talented newcomers I've seen in a while and he's growing by leaps and bounds: his proportions are superheroic but natural looking, his storytelling clear and precise and seems to be able to draw about anything thrown at him.
I hope they do return the Phantom a bit more to his pulpish roots and up the fantastic menaces. What they said about the allure of pulps is pretty dead on. While there should be a grounding in reality, the adventures and villains should be larger than life. A big part of the problem with the Phantom is that it has been largely the opposite for the last couple of decades. His jungle was fantasy, but his adventures were all mundane. To do the Phantom right, need to mix in equal parts of Edgar Rice Burroughs, Doc Savage and the Shadow.
The only line that really caused misgivings was about not being "family friendly" but they don't really explain what they mean by that. I don't think he should be cuddly, but you can do a straight-forward superhero story without it being campy OR grim and gritty. I hear a line like that and I fear they might be trying to go too far in the other direction. He should be mysterious, but not edgy and grim. He's always had a bit of the swashbuckler in him, one who loved his job.
-------------
|
Posted By: Dave Aikins
Date Posted: 08 November 2008 at 1:17pm
In other Moonstone news, I now have copies of the Avenger prose book, so I
guess that means it's out!
Hooray!
|
|