Posted: 18 August 2017 at 4:37am | IP Logged | 4
|
post reply
|
|
That's what I heard too, and I'm sure it's true. However, it brings to mind the question--Why publish ANYTHING that's not connected to the movies?
I mean, it didn't really HURT them to promote FANTASTIC FOUR, right? It's not like that FF movie (if you want to call it that) was directly up against IRON MAN 3 that week or anything.
So then the thinking seems to be--ONLY do comics based on movies you are making or plan to make! I almost wouldn't mind that! We'd have a good solid ten or twelve monthly series based on (male) THOR, (Steve Rogers) CAPTAIN AMERICA, (high school student) SPIDER-MAN, etc. I really could live with that!
But cancelling FANTASTIC FOUR because it's not their movie makes as much sense as cancelling MS. MARVEL, SHE-HULK, billionaire SPIDER-MAN, female THOR, DEVIL DINOSAUR & MOON GIRL, crazy MOON KNIGHT in a white suit, Korean HULK, their weird mixed AVENGERS/X-MEN books, etc--most of their line!--because none of those are going to be movies either.
|