Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum MOBILE
Byrne Robotics | The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 256 Next >>
Topic: What are you reading now? Post Reply | Post New Topic
Author
Message
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133317
Posted: 17 July 2011 at 7:45pm | IP Logged | 1 post reply

What kinds of books do you guys gravitate to? Fantasy? Nonfiction? Novels? Given only the choice of one type of book, what would you choose without fail above all others?

••

Historical biography, especially about the Tudor period in England. American Civil War comes a very close second.

Not sure if this is really an answer to your question, as it is neither of the above, but I make a point of rereading CITY AT WORLD'S END, by Edmond Hamilton, at least once a year.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133317
Posted: 17 July 2011 at 7:49pm | IP Logged | 2 post reply

I'm halfway through ISAAC'S STORM by Erik Larson. Not the writer/artist but the best selling author of both this book and DEVIL IN THE WHITE CITY. ISAAC'S STORM tells the true story of the hurricane that devestated Galvaston, TX in September of 1900

••

I have read and reread THE DEVIL IN THE WHITE CITY several times, tho I was disappointed with Larsen's next effort, THUNDERSTRUCK. A failed attempt to rebottle the lightning of DEVIL, that simply strained too far to make its "connections". I had not heard about ISAAC'S STORM, but I did recently watch a show on the Weather Channel about the Galveston storm. Terrifying! Came close to making Katrina look like a harsh breeze. I may have to check out this book.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security

Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 35941
Posted: 17 July 2011 at 8:03pm | IP Logged | 3 post reply

It's fascinating and highly recommended. Like I said, it starts out slow
but builds momentum as it progresses. It probably also benefits from
being written well before DEVIL IN THE WHITE CITY. I believe it was
Larson's first book, published in 1999. Yeah, Katrina feels like a warm
breeze compared to the storm that literally attacked Galvaston in
1900.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security

Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 35941
Posted: 17 July 2011 at 8:05pm | IP Logged | 4 post reply

I recently bought THUNDERSTRUCK based on how much I loved
DEVIL IN THE WHITE CITY. Now I'm a bit dismayed that it's not as
good as that book or ISAAC'S STORM. Wish Larson hadn't tried so
hard to weave the story when it wasn't there. DEVIL, with 20/20
hindsight, was a fantasic parallel, but not something to be found in
every subject.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brett Wilson
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 07 April 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 318
Posted: 17 July 2011 at 8:17pm | IP Logged | 5 post reply

Anything dealing with history is interesting. I'll read about any military conflict. Read a book about the Falklands War recently.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Aaron Smith
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 06 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 10461
Posted: 22 July 2011 at 7:07pm | IP Logged | 6 post reply

PET SEMETARY by Stephen King.

I have mixed feelings about King's work. Some of his books are great but many are mediocre in my opinion. This is one of the better ones so far.

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Michael Arndt
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 26 April 2004
Posts: 8565
Posted: 22 July 2011 at 10:02pm | IP Logged | 7 post reply

Getting ready to read  On Her Majesty's Secret Service and Dr. No. Have never read a James Bond book before.

My favorite types of reading are history and biographies.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Phil Frances
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 08 August 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 345
Posted: 22 July 2011 at 10:22pm | IP Logged | 8 post reply

JB - regards the Tudor period, you might wish to try 'Wolf Hall', by Hilary Mantel -- here's the 'blurb' :

Winner of the Man Booker Prize 2009 'Lock Cromwell in a deep dungeon in the morning,' says Thomas More, 'and when you come back that night he'll be sitting on a plush cushion eating larks' tongues, and all the gaolers will owe him money.' England, the 1520s. Henry VIII is on the throne, but has no heir. Cardinal Wolsey is his chief advisor, charged with securing the divorce the pope refuses to grant. Into this atmosphere of distrust and need comes Thomas Cromwell, first as Wolsey's clerk, and later his successor. Cromwell is a wholly original man: the son of a brutal blacksmith, a political genius, a briber, a charmer, a bully, a man with a delicate and deadly expertise in manipulating people and events. Ruthless in pursuit of his own interests, he is as ambitious in his wider politics as he is for himself. His reforming agenda is carried out in the grip of a self-interested parliament and a king who fluctuates between romantic passions and murderous rages. From one of our finest living writers, Wolf Hall is that very rare thing: a truly great English novel, one that explores the intersection of individual psychology and wider politics. With a vast array of characters, and richly overflowing with incident, it peels back history to show us Tudor England as a half-made society, moulding itself with great passion and suffering and courage.

I found it entirely engrossing.


Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Steve D Swanson
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 04 May 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1374
Posted: 22 July 2011 at 10:31pm | IP Logged | 9 post reply

Heh, I'm also reading Isaac's Storm by Erik Larson.

Just finished Hounded by Kevin Hearne which was a very good urban fantasy set in Arizona. Only problem I had was that it was described as funny by a reviewer and I don't think I laughed once. Humor is hard to make work in a novel and usually translates to a bright, airy feel (which this had) but seldom ever provokes laughter. At least for me.

Last week I read The Devil in the White City which as I was reading it I found utterly engrossing but given some time and thought I'm a little less enamored of the book. Basically the two leads are thematically linked but their link in real life is very tenuous and I kept thinking there had to be some connection for the book to focus on those two men like it did. Basically, the killer just happens to be around Chicago at the time of the World's fair and would have done the same thing pretty much anywhere else he happened to be. Thematically, as a contrast between the two, it was brilliant but the man who shoots the mayor at the end of the fair seems like a better fit as a work of history. But that's probably just me (though there were times when reading it that I thought Larson had started with that concept and moved away when the story of the shooter proved not to be as interesting as he might have hoped).

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Eric Ladd
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 16 August 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 4505
Posted: 23 July 2011 at 4:31am | IP Logged | 10 post reply

True and False: Heresy and Common Sense for the Actor by David Mamet.
The House of Barrymore by Margot Peters.
I Hate Hamlet by Paul Rudnick.

I have an audition coming up and I kinda want the part. =)
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133317
Posted: 23 July 2011 at 4:36am | IP Logged | 11 post reply

Just started IN THE GARDEN OF BEASTS by Erik Larson, author of THE DEVIL THE WHITE CITY. It's about the American ambassador and his family who were sent to Berlin in 1933, just as Hitler was solidifying his power. Just a few chapters into it, and already engrossed.

Here Larson eschews the "parallel lives" approach that worked so well in CITY but failed so completely in THUNDERSTRUCK. Already GARDEN is a better book for this choice.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133317
Posted: 23 July 2011 at 4:40am | IP Logged | 12 post reply

Last week I read The Devil in the White City which as I was reading it I found utterly engrossing but given some time and thought I'm a little less enamored of the book. Basically the two leads are thematically linked but their link in real life is very tenuous and I kept thinking there had to be some connection for the book to focus on those two men like it did. Basically, the killer just happens to be around Chicago at the time of the World's fair and would have done the same thing pretty much anywhere else he happened to be. Thematically, as a contrast between the two, it was brilliant but the man who shoots the mayor at the end of the fair seems like a better fit as a work of history. But that's probably just me (though there were times when reading it that I thought Larson had started with that concept and moved away when the story of the shooter proved not to be as interesting as he might have hoped).

••

If Larson had not stated up front that the two men never met (so far as is known) you might have a point. But since he did, then your criticism basically boils down to "this is not the book / would have written" -- and speaking as an author, that is a school of commentary I find utterly unacceptable.

Read a book for what it IS, not what you think it should have been.

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 256 Next >>
  Post Reply | Post New Topic |

Forum Jump

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login

You are currently viewing the MOBILE version of the site.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL SITE