| Posted: 07 December 2012 at 8:19pm | IP Logged | 6
|
|
|
I don't think Superman's morals have anything to do with him being boring. It's the "classic" 50's trappings, and the "nobody can defeat him" DC way of handling him that is boring.
He never seems to have common, every-day problems that would make him easy to relate to either. Ex: the print industry is dying thanks to the Internet, yet Superman doesn't have to worry about losing his job, being unemployed, or really have any money problems at all. He has no romance/woman problems, or any other common-man issues.
All of these impediments to being interesting, are not the character's fault, but the writers's and the DCU's way they always portray Superman.
Another example: No Superman villain should be able to defeat the entire Justice League. It makes the League unnecessary when Superman is more than capable of handling problems they can't. The whole dynamic with Superman's power-levels and abilities is ass-backwards. If Superman was at odds with the league, and they showed up to capture him, fans should be excited wondering how Superman could possibly evade the league, but instead they'd be wondering how could the League possibly defeat/capture Superman. That's what makes Superman boring.
|