Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum MOBILE
Byrne Robotics | The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 5 Next >>
Topic: Question for JB: Regarding Ms Marvel and the X-Men Locked Post Reply | Post New Topic
Author
Message
Christopher Frost
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 24 October 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 484
Posted: 11 January 2017 at 10:31pm | IP Logged | 1  

I'm pretty sure that the two stories were drawn years after the series ended which is why the art looks they way it does. The Marvel Super Heroes anthology book, as noted above, was a dumping ground for inventory and other unused stories. Since Claremont was still a big name at the time I believe the editors pulled out the unused scripts and assigned someone to draw them for publication.
Back to Top profile | search
 
David Miller
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 3157
Posted: 11 January 2017 at 10:52pm | IP Logged | 2  

Further googling suggests the Claremont/Vosburg pages of "#25" were completed sometime in the Eighties for Marvel Fanfare*, which could explain the otherwise inexplicably prescient appearance of Byrne Brotherhood designs, characterization of Rogue, and script approach evocative of Kitty Pride & Wolverine.

*At least according to anonymous blog comments summoning vague memories of ancient fanzine interviews.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Brian Hague
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 14 November 2006
Posts: 8515
Posted: 12 January 2017 at 12:06am | IP Logged | 3  

That does make a bit more sense... 

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Matthew Wilkie
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 09 March 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1139
Posted: 12 January 2017 at 7:15am | IP Logged | 4  

Wait, who came up with the name Jason Wyngard? I guess I remember it 
being JB-- I'm sure that's why I thought this story must have been after or 
during the storyline created in X-Men. 

***

My recollection too with JB merging the names of the actor Peter Wyngarde and, the character he played, Jason King.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 134111
Posted: 12 January 2017 at 7:16am | IP Logged | 5  

NOW it makes sense!

And, yes, "Jason Wyngarde" was mine.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Dave Kopperman
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 27 December 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3657
Posted: 12 January 2017 at 9:16am | IP Logged | 6  

 Mark Haslett wrote:
...And Rogue was introduced as a girl in her teens? I'm not sure Michael Golden was in on that bit of information.


To be fair(?), I'm not certain Golden would have drawn her any differently had he known.  Witness this panel from X-Men annual something-or-other of Kitty and Illyana, both maybe 13-14 years old.  I can't seem to find the rest of the page, but I remember at the time thinking it was WAAAAAY oversxualized (and if I felt that way at the same age, it must have been pretty bad).

Edited: aha - a little more of the page, here: 


Edited by Dave Kopperman on 12 January 2017 at 9:25am
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 134111
Posted: 12 January 2017 at 9:44am | IP Logged | 7  

OW! I just got hit in the face with a brick (or two)!
Back to Top profile | search
 
Dave Kopperman
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 27 December 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3657
Posted: 12 January 2017 at 9:53am | IP Logged | 8  

Yeah, I'll bet. As Kitty's creator, that panel with the bomb pop is probably pretty egregious.  I'm certain all of that business is in the script, but Golden really pushed it.  The previous page (which I can't find but wonder if someone else can) was straight-up T&A.

Not to knock Golden, who had (has) an appealing style with a beautiful, clean line and strong compositional and storytelling sense, but his stuff has not aged well for me - maybe because I can see a strong influence he had on McFarlane.  Who I also liked fine at the time.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Ronald Joseph
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 18 April 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 1784
Posted: 12 January 2017 at 2:51pm | IP Logged | 9  

...And Rogue was introduced as a girl in her teens?

Rogue being a sixteen-year-old certainly makes this an awkward scene...

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Matt Hawes
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 16587
Posted: 12 January 2017 at 5:53pm | IP Logged | 10  

Ronald, how so? That wasn't a romantic scene, that was Wolverine making a sacrifice to save the life of a teammate who he has just earned respect for (Wolverine did not trust Rogue, who he just found out was inducted to the X-Men, when this story began).

Admittedly, it's been since 1983 or so that I last read that comic, but I don't see anything indecent in those panels. Is it that he calls her "darlin'"? Wolverine did that with all the ladies, and not as a lewd come on.

Edited to add: Do you think they were making out in that last panel? Really, I am trying to understand how you interpreted that scene as salacious in any way.


Edited by Matt Hawes on 12 January 2017 at 5:56pm
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Ronald Joseph
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 18 April 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 1784
Posted: 12 January 2017 at 7:16pm | IP Logged | 11  

Do you think they were making out in that last panel? Really, I am trying to understand how you interpreted that scene as salacious in any way.

Making out? No, not at all. But did he kiss her on the mouth? Absolutely.  

Earlier in that issue, Rogue leans in towards Logan in a very suggestive manner and tries to kiss him and this scene was a callback to that. The way Logan is holding her face in the second panel implies (to me, anyway) that he was going for the lips.

A kiss on the forehead would have done the job. But that whole scene reads as just a little "off" to me. . 
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Ronald Joseph
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 18 April 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 1784
Posted: 12 January 2017 at 7:19pm | IP Logged | 12  

I'll add: from an artist's standpoint, Paul Smith pulling the camera waaaaay back gives the scene a more intimate ("private") feel than a kiss on the forehead or cheek would need.

 

 
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 

<< Prev Page of 5 Next >>
  Post Reply | Post New Topic |

Forum Jump

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login

You are currently viewing the MOBILE version of the site.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL SITE