Is a significant enough portion of the population making the change to impact the culture at large?  If so, then yes. I sometimes wonder why people oppose such changes.

Is is because they are against the reason for the change? If so then OK, people have conflicting opinions on the reasons behind any change.

Is it because they are just used to certain words and dislike the change? That one I understand less. Language always changes and I don't think we are any worse off linguistically because other words, now considered archaic, fell out of use or were replaced. Technology (such as the telegraph and SMS messaging) drastically changed how we write, and social movements have had similar impacts on language. At the time the changes may have been lamented but soon they become the norm and possibly then faded again for the next round of change.

Is it something else?

English as it currently is happens to be the language I speak, read and write but beyond that I don't have an undue emotional attachment to it. As long as it allows me to communicate with those I needed to it has done it's job as far as I am concerned, changes or not.

I’m not concerned about woman going away any time soon. I am, however, bothered by the word “Yeet!”

But anything anyone wants to call themselves, just let me know and it's all good. Might not always get it right, but there's no reason to deny people who they are.

AFAB mean "assigned female at birth".

I tend not to get too hung up on these things.  They work themselves out regardless of how much or little I care about them.  

You seem to be confused about the whole "people who menstruate" brouhaha, James. No one is advocating this as a replacement for the term woman.

Rowling was commenting about this article, which was discussing the accessibility of menstrual materials amidst the pandemic.

This was not a discussion about post-menopausal women. This was not a discussion about women in general. It was about people who need hygiene products, which include women, girls, trans men, and nonbinary people who go through menstruation. "People who menstruate" was meant to be inclusive of people who don't identify as women, yet still menstruate. Rowling chimed in and implied that the correct term for this was women, for which she got accused of transphobia.

Then she continued to double down by writing a long essay defending her views and including the bathroom debate and her concerns that male predators will pretend to be trans to get access to women's bathrooms. And then she deleted a tweet praising Stephen King and unfollowed him after he acknowledged that trans women are women.