Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum MOBILE
Byrne Robotics | The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 11
Topic: Three Things I’d Change Post Reply | Post New Topic
Author
Message
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 134275
Posted: 11 October 2023 at 4:09pm | IP Logged | 1 post reply

Sekowski had a rep for being fast. He tended to turn in jobs well before deadline. Apparently, an editor (don't recall which or even if said editor was named in the story) said to him upon receiving some pages (PP), "Your stuff looks a little rushed. Your work would look so much better if you took a little extra time on it." So Sekowski, on his next job for that editor, finished his work in the same amount of time and sat on it until the day before deadline. Inspecting the new pages the editor allegedly said "That's so much better. See what you can do when you take your time?".

Does this story ring any bells with you. Chief? Or do you have - or know of - any similar tales?

•••

There are loads of stories likely that!

One of my favorites involves a Walt Simonson THOR cover, which showed the Thunder God having just had the crap beaten out of him. One of the Higher Ups (let’s not name names since this is second hand) declared Thor didn’t look “handsome” enough and ordered the cover redone. Mark Gruenwald, the editor on THOR, took the piece to John Romita, and got him to redraw the face—on overlay!

When the finished book came thru the office the Original Higher Up was out, so Gruenie peeled off the patch and got a Less Higher Up to sign off on it. When the published issue came in from the printer the OHU brought a copy into Mark’s office, declaring “See? Doesn’t that look better?”

Back to Top profile | search
 
Rebecca Jansen
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 12 February 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 4635
Posted: 11 October 2023 at 4:44pm | IP Logged | 2 post reply

I guess my feeling is if you've assigned/hired Walt Simonson for a title, or any other known professional with a track record, that's who the readership will be expecting/wanting to see. If you don't like Walt Simonson art then don't have Walt Simonson? Did the artistry/name of an editor ever sell a comic to many people? Well, for me I would find I liked Archie Goodwin and Denny O'Neil edited books... their name could get me to try something I might otherwise not. If there is a 'correction' that is crucially needed and the original artist can't find some way to do it... but you'd think that would be fairly rare. E.C. had Will Elder or Wally Wood who could accurately mimic other artists' styles... I wonder if Marie Severin might've been capable at that too (although I love spotting her work even just in ads at Marvel).

I thought Zeck's Deathlok was perfect... maybe that's the limited series he could've been doing instead of Secret Wars? His Captain America seemed to have a bit of a big chin but I bought it up until he left, and for a bit after... he did a great Scarecrow!
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Rodrigo castellanos
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 03 July 2012
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 1560
Posted: 14 October 2023 at 4:12am | IP Logged | 3 post reply

Apparently, an editor (don't recall which or even if said editor was named in the story) said to him upon receiving some pages (PP), "Your stuff looks a little rushed. Your work would look so much better if you took a little extra time on it."

I think almost everyone can relate to that.

In my job (advertising creative), it's a rule of thumb that even if you have the whole campaign figured out in the first few days after receiving the brief, you never, ever, show it "internally" (account team or whatever) until the very last moment.

Not only because of the "rushed" bias, but also because if you give them time, they WILL come up with changes or "suggestions" when idle. Don't give them that opportunity.


Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 134275
Posted: 14 October 2023 at 5:33pm | IP Logged | 4 post reply

Editors who think their job is to make (often arbitrary) changes are a bane in creative endeavors. Mark Gruenwald (not exactly innocent himself) told me of one Higher Up who instructed those under him “if you’ve already made 25 changes in one issue, go ahead and make that 26th.”

And then there was the editor at DC of whom another editor said “he’d change the spelling of his own name in the credits if he could think of a reason to do it.”

Back to Top profile | search
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

<< Prev Page of 11
  Post Reply | Post New Topic |

Forum Jump

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login

You are currently viewing the MOBILE version of the site.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL SITE