Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum MOBILE
Byrne Robotics | The John Byrne Forum Page of 2 Next >>
Topic: Qestion for JB, the seven eight seven rule? Post Reply | Post New Topic
Author
Message
Rick Whiting
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 22 April 2004
Posts: 2198
Posted: 02 July 2024 at 2:08am | IP Logged | 1 post reply

Recently, Rob Liefeld offered some tips on how to write and draw successful comics and he talked about the "seven eight seven" rule. I was wondering is this really a rule and is Liefeld right? Here's a direct quote from Liefeld and I will post a link to the article.

"Here's the deal.. there is a tried and true when you get down to doing a monthly comic… Seven eight seven … what does that mean? Open your comics with seven pages of your character using their power introducing themselves to the reader, doing their cool whatever it is that they do. Then the middle eight pages, is when they go home, they have their school life, work life, getting screwed over, whatever, sublots, character action. girlfriend, wife, that's your middle eight… the last seven pages is the conflict, there's action, more using of the powers and the villain making his move to the end of the cliffhanger so they come back next month. That is my tip to you my friend, seven eight seven."


https://bleedingcool.com/comics/gerry-duggan-chip-zdarsky-pa y-rob-liefeld-to-teach-jonathan-hickman/
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132645
Posted: 02 July 2024 at 4:52am | IP Logged | 2 post reply

First I’ve heard of this “rule”.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mark Haslett
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6277
Posted: 02 July 2024 at 5:26am | IP Logged | 3 post reply

One thing for sure: When you go to Rob Liefeld for advice, you get Rob Liefeld's advice.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Craig Earl
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 13 July 2019
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1289
Posted: 02 July 2024 at 5:43am | IP Logged | 4 post reply

Surely, having a rule to stick by like 'seven eight seven' doesn't allow for an offbeat or original approach...
Back to Top profile | search
 
Eric Jansen
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 27 October 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 2323
Posted: 02 July 2024 at 7:20am | IP Logged | 5 post reply

This seems to be a variation on the "three-act play."  But it doesn't sound right.  And, of course, everything's "written for the trade" these days, so it's more likely that the first issue will be the set-up, the last issue will be the climax, and however-many-issues will be the middle act.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132645
Posted: 02 July 2024 at 12:14pm | IP Logged | 6 post reply

I’m reminded of a complaint I had when working with Chris, in the days before I took a stronger hand in the plotting. Often he’d concoct “three part” stories that were really two parts, with a vaguely unconnected part in between.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Peter Martin
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 17 March 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 15881
Posted: 02 July 2024 at 2:40pm | IP Logged | 7 post reply

I think the full title of the rule is: 787 with no feet showing.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Dave Kopperman
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 27 December 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3225
Posted: 02 July 2024 at 3:43pm | IP Logged | 8 post reply

I wonder if he just means that every comic should contain a scene set in Puerto Rico?

In all seriousness, this doesn't sound like bad advice for beginners at all - sometimes just having a structure in mind - even an arbitrary one - is a good way to work while you're learning the process.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132645
Posted: 02 July 2024 at 4:09pm | IP Logged | 9 post reply

When Shooter arrived at Marvel (as Archie Goodwin’s assistant), he called me up to introduce himself. Two things came out of that conversation: my eventual assignment to MARVEL TEAM-UP, and Shooter’s declaration that when it came to storytelling there were NO RULES, as long as the story was a good one.

This stands as profound contrast to the Shooter who was eventually ousted from Marvel, whose whole approach was to finds rules for EVERYTHING. (When Roger Stern and I pitched a series we called BOOGIEMAN, before asking us anything at all about what we had in mind, Shooter declared “You’ll have to spell it correctly.” Right out of the gate he found a RULE.)

Rules are, indeed, a good way for a newbie to build her/himself a foundation. A foundation from which many strange twists and turns can be built. But Liefeld’s 7-8-7 doesn’t sound like a learning tool. It sounds like something he thinks should be done EVERY TIME.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Josh Goldberg
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 25 October 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2067
Posted: 02 July 2024 at 5:10pm | IP Logged | 10 post reply

I was flipping through JB's FF Visonaries last night.  JB covered all these bases in his work, but without such a rigid rule regarding structure.
While re-reading JB's FF Annual #17, I was surprised to see that not one member of the fantastic Four even appeared in the first 17 pages of this 38-page story.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Peter Hicks
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 30 April 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1913
Posted: 02 July 2024 at 5:13pm | IP Logged | 11 post reply

Alan Moore said after his run on Swamp Thing that every story was a 3 act play.  In Act One, the villain starts his evil plan rolling, and Swamp Thing knows nothing about it.  In Act Two, they meet, they fight, and Swamp Thing loses.  In Act Three, Swamp Thing wins.  Rinse and repeat.  The plot pacing looks a little less obvious by inserting the occasional “Meanwhile…” page to hint at an upcoming villain.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132645
Posted: 03 July 2024 at 11:41am | IP Logged | 12 post reply

Flashing back again to those days with Claremont, especially on X-MEN, there was something he and I both found frustrating.

We would often use the three part model cited by Moore, with the first part being set up as a subplot. Then, in the first part proper, our heroes would get trounced by the bad guy(s), to rally and save the day next issue.

The first half would invariably lead to a clump of letters grumbling “the X-Men must not be as tough as I thought,” followed a month later with “the X-Men beat [whoever]! Guess he’s not so hot after all!”

Back to Top profile | search
 

Page of 2 Next >>
  Post Reply | Post New Topic |

Forum Jump

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login

You are currently viewing the MOBILE version of the site.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL SITE