Abortion has been overthrown, civil rights are in danger, and nobody knew how Trump thought or fought in 2016. 

He's weak, he's vulnerable, he can be beaten. 

I think Kamala will kick his ass.

And the losers, punks, and trolls who dismiss her as a lightweight really ought to put up some facts-- maybe post their resume alongside hers, you know? Let's see who's judging this woman. I'm pretty damn certain I won't get anyone taking this challenge.

Have a better candidate and they don't vote for Nader. I remember disliking both the top candidates in 2000. I nearly voted 3rd party. If voters aren't voting for your party/candidate the party needs to figure out why and adapt. I haven't seen either side adapt much lately. I have noticed more and more voters consider themselves Independent.

Learn from your mistakes.

I do not understand this mentality.  What's the point of voting for someone who has no chance of winning?  You might just as well not vote at all.  Your vote accomplishes nothing.  If you're fixated on the notion that a candidate has to perfectly fit your own views, then you might as well just write in your own name.

The point of voting is to make laws/policies happen which you favor.  Even if you dislike both major-party candidates, there is certainly one whose policies are closer to what you would like than the other.  Why not vote for that person and perhaps help make some difference in what happens?  I can sort of understand people who don't vote at all, either due to apathy or hopelessness.  But going to the trouble of voting and then throwing away your vote? That makes no sense. 

 

That one most likely is inaccurate.  People forget that Perot dropped out of the race in July 1992.  During the time Perot was not running, Clinton was consistently polling well ahead of Bush, with Clinton's percent in the low 50s and Bush's in the high 30s.  When Perot re-entered the campaign in September, Clinton dropped in the polls but Bush stayed where he'd been, in the high 30s.  So if anything, Perot seems to have hurt Clinton more than Bush.