I didn't say it was.  I'm just taking my time.  Harris hasn't rolled out her policy agenda yet.  I want to see what it is.   

"Getting into the details of what’s wrong with the alternative to the racist
rapist is to invite the idea of voting for the racist rapist."

Ignoring the details is stupid.  And I haven't exaggerated anything.

Interestingly, the Harris campaign seems to be insisting that the mics not be muted because they believe Trump's inability to be heard during the Biden debate effectively tamed him and led him appearing more in self-control and thus more presidential, and they would much rather have Trump verbally out of control.

At this point, I'm puzzled that anyone who isn't a full-on truth-denying MAGA follower would say that their voting decision comes down to policy details.  Trump is impulsive, petulant, and vindictive... he's incapable of acknowledging error and often incapable of acknowledging facts that contradict what he wishes to be the truth.  The latter traits seem to rise to the level of pathology, meaning it's not just that he has a hard time accepting facts he doesn't like, but rather he actually convinces himself they are not true.  He also has a difficult time retaining and processing facts, and he's easily manipulated by flattery.  In short, he's someone who's fundamentally unfit for office, and particularly unfit to be in charge of military decisions. It's deeply frightening to contemplate him being in charge of nuclear codes.  The fact that a guy who isn't a pilot managed to sit in the pilot's chair and not crash the plane for four years doesn't somehow mean it's a safe idea to give him another shot at trying to fly the plane.

At this point, policy is irrelevant.  If Trump and Harris's policy positions were inverted I would still vote for Harris, because the most important thing is to have someone who is intellectually, emotionally, and psychiatrically competent in that position.

 

I think the Harris campaign is making a big mistake if they successfully push to have mics unmuted.  The more chaotic the situation, the more that works to Trump's advantage.  Allowing Trump to interrupt and talk over her will make him look strong and domineering.  And forcing Harris to try to talk over him will make her look shrewish to some people (double standard I know, but it's true).  I don't think her "Mr. Vice President, I am speaking" bit in the 2020 debates (when Pence was interrupting her) came off particularly well for her.  She needs to be able to calmly and effectively point out when Trump is lying and spouting BS, and that will be much harder to do if he is able to interrupt her and talk over her.

On top of that, he ran in 2016 on overturning the ACA without ever once saying what the plan was to replace it - and then was unsuccessful in overturning it for four full years without ever saying what the replacement would be.  So it's empty logic to wait for Harris to outline an explicit health care plan before deciding how to cast your vote, as you'd never know what Trump's alternative is.

MAGAts and all others.

Anytime that you hear someone from the Trump campaign team say,

"See You Next Tuesday", to Harris' team:

It's code for a derogatory term directed at Kamala.

Hence the, "...fuck over the country"......

*****************

At his own peril....