Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum MOBILE
Byrne Robotics | The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 2
Topic: Lame Characters Post Reply | Post New Topic
Author
Message
Peter Martin
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 17 March 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 16116
Posted: 21 April 2025 at 8:55pm | IP Logged | 1 post reply

A lot of superhero characters are potentially lame and it's a testament to good storytelling (and respect for the characters and medium) that most are pretty cool.

For the record, Puck was a good character. What is lame in that list is the contempt shown by the storytellers in the panels with Spider-Man and Paste-Pot-Pete.

There's nothing cool about a writer or artist looking down their nose at the characters they are working with.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 134207
Posted: 21 April 2025 at 9:06pm | IP Logged | 2 post reply

Sadly, as the market has shrunk, the ennui-engorged fanboys have increased their numbers, proportionally, and as some of them have even crossed over to the professional side, their influence has increased accordingly. Look at the kinds of stories that have pushed their way to the fore, where honor and nobility are to be scoffed at, and authority figures are deliberately diminished.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brennan Voboril
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 15 January 2011
Posts: 1812
Posted: 21 April 2025 at 10:56pm | IP Logged | 3 post reply

Could not agree more. As a child comics taught me so much about doing the right thing, honor, bravery, etc. Today’s books? 
Back to Top profile | search
 
James Woodcock
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 21 September 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 8071
Posted: 22 April 2025 at 5:35am | IP Logged | 4 post reply

Three things, to my mind, cemented lame characters and ‘there are no true
heroes.
Scourge, THE DARK KNIGHT and WATCHMEN.

After those three, characters were never the same.
There were occasions beforehand, but post those, there was a train that
just about everyone wanted to be on.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Kevin Brown
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 31 May 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 9120
Posted: 22 April 2025 at 5:25pm | IP Logged | 5 post reply

No Squirrel Girl?  I'm seriously shocked.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Paul Kimball
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 21 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2228
Posted: 25 April 2025 at 4:44am | IP Logged | 6 post reply

puck is an interesting character and as far as I know, unique.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Rodrigo castellanos
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 03 July 2012
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 1554
Posted: 27 April 2025 at 6:20am | IP Logged | 7 post reply

Look at the kinds of stories that have pushed their way to the fore, where honor and nobility are to be scoffed at, and authority figures are deliberately diminished.

Similar thing happened with American cinema in the '70s.

And it was an incredibly creative era that gave us a lot of classic films.

But then Spielberg and Co. went the other way in the '80s and heroes came back with a bang.

It's all about cycles. If comics couldn't appropriately respond to the "grim n' gritty" stuff (debatable) with a superior vision I'm afraid it's comics' fault.

Interestingly, film world has been dominated by the very same superheroes for the better part of the past two decades while comics haven't been up to the task.


Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Floyd
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 07 July 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 8802
Posted: 28 April 2025 at 3:56am | IP Logged | 8 post reply

I think sometimes you need lame or whacky (whack + wacky) characters, to make the weird/mediocre ones look more interesting:

Hero #1: "Oh, crap! Its Pinetaurus, the Baseball Minotaur!"

Hero #2 (less than thrilled): "This goon is going to be a problem. Why couldn't it be someone like Hindsight?"

Hero #1: "Really? I'd rather not have to capture a freak whose eyes are on his butt cheeks again!"











Edited by Brian Floyd on 28 April 2025 at 1:21pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Mark Haslett
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6801
Posted: 28 April 2025 at 6:44am | IP Logged | 9 post reply

Rodrigo: Similar thing happened with American cinema in the '70s.And it was an incredibly creative era that gave us a lot of classic films.

**

Categorical difference. Superhero comics and "American Cinema" are not 2 of the same kinds of things.

And even if we test the case for the fun of it, we find the most successful works of that era of American movies were not not "scoffing" at honor and nobility, but critiquing traditional portrayals of it and looking for new ways to see it. When authority figures were deliberately diminished, it was (at least faintly) a defense of honor and an attempt to expose hipocricy or institutional injustice.

Superhero comics became a weird kind of echo of an echo in that regard. "Watchmen" prototypically tears down the "facade" of heroism using a group of characters who were invented to be hypocrits. It was going through the motions, as if the failings of the Watchmen were emblematic-- only they were in no way emblematic. At best, they kind of resembled the heroes with feet of clay that were found in 1970's American cinema. They were trotted out and their "failings" were their downfall-- but it was a kind of Kabuki performance of false heroes-- a "critique" that had no actual target.

And, in many ways, that was some kind of high-point for comic writing in the last 40 years.

At any rate-- it's no defense of superhero comics to say American Cinema went through a similar cycle. Superhero comics are about one thing: Superheroes. Scoff at nobility in that context and the heart of the thing stops beating.

Edited by Mark Haslett on 28 April 2025 at 6:51am
Back to Top profile | search
 
Rodrigo castellanos
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 03 July 2012
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 1554
Posted: 28 April 2025 at 3:46pm | IP Logged | 10 post reply

Hrmm... if you think WATCHMEN was this lethal wound that superheroes couldn't possibly come back from ever, then I guess you don't think much of superheroes.

I, of course, think that's ridiculous. But I guess it's telling either way.


Since we're talking about similarities and differences between film and comics (which I find super interesting!), the WATCHMEN film came out mid (or maybe even pre) superhero movie boom and basically nothing happened.

People lined up even more so to watch the Avengers being heroic afterwards. It wasn't a lethal wound or anything of the sort. So, again, maybe comics should look at itself in the mirror.









Edited by Rodrigo castellanos on 28 April 2025 at 3:55pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Kevin Hagerman
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 15 April 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 18176
Posted: 28 April 2025 at 3:49pm | IP Logged | 11 post reply

Some characters are interesting in a "I can read minds" way, and that's fine.  Puck interested me in that he had that "I know a lot of things about a lot of things" mystique that drew me to the early days of Wolverine.  So Alpha Flight #17, their first face-to-face meeting, was really cool ("That WAS you that time in Maracaibo, wasn't it?").
Back to Top profile | search
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

<< Prev Page of 2
  Post Reply | Post New Topic |

Forum Jump

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login

You are currently viewing the MOBILE version of the site.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL SITE