Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum MOBILE
Byrne Robotics | The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 6 Next >>
Topic: Unsalvageable heroes Post Reply | Post New Topic
Author
Message
Charles Valderrama
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4721
Posted: 07 January 2018 at 2:35pm | IP Logged | 1 post reply

Many responses here have hit the nail right on the head! Fanboy writers and their followers have been responsible for poorly received, unsalvageable characters.

Part of why I've enjoyed following JB's career is that he's taken characters many found lame, awful... laughable even... and has reinvigorated them.... found ways to write fun, compelling stories with them.

-C!
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Robert Bradley
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 20 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4829
Posted: 07 January 2018 at 4:20pm | IP Logged | 2 post reply

Don't even get me started on the treatment of Hank Pym.

But even when he's portrayed at his worst he's still an interesting and usable character.

I think the only characters that are really hard to salvage are characters who are representative of the time they were created and show how much society has changed since then.

For instance, It's hard to take a character like Mahkizmo or Firebrand who would need to be overhauled to be taken seriously or characters like the Red Guardian who represents a bygone political era.

I'm sure they could all be re-worked for a new audience, but would they still be the same characters?


Back to Top profile | search | www
 
William Costello
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 30 August 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 738
Posted: 08 January 2018 at 8:05pm | IP Logged | 3 post reply

Man Thing was recently revived as a limited series by MARVEL with R.LStine as the series author. In this version, Man Thing was quite "sentient" and, of all things, somewhat funny. More in tone with the R.L. Stine Goosebumps books than the traditional MARVEL treatment of Man Thing.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132303
Posted: 08 January 2018 at 8:23pm | IP Logged | 4 post reply

Man Thing was recently revived as a limited series by MARVEL with R.L. Stine as the series author. In this version, Man Thing was quite "sentient" and, of all things, somewhat funny. More in tone with the R.L. Stine Goosebumps books than the traditional MARVEL treatment of Man Thing.

•••

sigh

Back to Top profile | search
 
Rick Whiting
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 22 April 2004
Posts: 2188
Posted: 08 January 2018 at 10:03pm | IP Logged | 5 post reply

Man Thing was recently revived as a limited series by MARVEL with R.L. Stine as the series author. In this version, Man Thing was quite "sentient" and, of all things, somewhat funny. More in tone with the R.L. Stine Goosebumps books than the traditional MARVEL treatment of Man Thing.

_______________________________


I can't help wondering if that was current Marvel's way of stomping on Steve Gerber's grave since Gerber was very outspoken about Marvel hiring another writer to retell/reboot his original Omega The Unknown series instead of hiring Gerber and Mary Skrenes to write the series. He also pissed Tom Brevoort off over a SPider-Man Team-Up story from the 90's featuring Howard The Duck that unofficially crossed over with (I think) a Savage Dragon/Destroyer Duck comic in which the real Howard the Duck and Beverly left the Marvel Universe at the end of the story and was replaced by a clones. IIRC, Brevoort took real offense to the ending of that story and said that Gerber snuck that last scene in without him knowing about it since he didn't edit or even know what was in the Savage Dragon/Destroyer Duck comic.

Edited by Rick Whiting on 08 January 2018 at 10:56pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Eric Jansen
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 27 October 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 2292
Posted: 09 January 2018 at 12:20am | IP Logged | 6 post reply

They just released MAN-THING collections proudly touting Steve Gerber's name on the cover (even though other writers were involved).  Marvel is guilty of a lot of things, but I don't think this is one of them.  Unlike Howard, Gerber did not create Man-Thing and plenty of other writers have written him before and since Gerber.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Rod Collins
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 932
Posted: 09 January 2018 at 3:43am | IP Logged | 7 post reply

A mini-series by Gerber called "Infernal Man-Thing" came out in 2012, illustrated by Kevin Nowlan. I think it was an old project that had been gathering dust for twenty years or so, until Nowlan decided to complete it.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Neil Lindholm
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 12 January 2005
Location: China
Posts: 4940
Posted: 09 January 2018 at 4:04am | IP Logged | 8 post reply

Skateman. 
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132303
Posted: 09 January 2018 at 11:05am | IP Logged | 9 post reply

All that is really required to "redeem" a lame character is for the writers and artists to take them seriously. Unfortunately, in the past few decades we have seen far too many "creative" teams that started by not taking the characters seriously. Thus we get characters deliberately created to mock the whole concept of superhero comics. Not much to be done there.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Joe Hollon
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 08 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 13675
Posted: 09 January 2018 at 3:03pm | IP Logged | 10 post reply

The RL Stine Man-Thing comic was a total travesty.
Really have no idea what was going on there or why.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Robbie Parry
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 17 June 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 12186
Posted: 09 January 2018 at 3:09pm | IP Logged | 11 post reply

*Googles Man-Thing/R.L. Stine*

*Immediately regrets it*

EDIT: Why do that?

My favourite car is a Range Rover. Imagine if I went to work for Rover and said, "I want to make your car into a three-wheeled model. And I'll change this, too." Rover would tell me to piss off and find a job where I can do those things.

Making Man-Thing furry, sentient and communicative misses the point. Why didn't Stine create another character?

What's next, Spider-Man working as a moon cop and shooting laser webs from his eyes?


Edited by Robbie Parry on 09 January 2018 at 3:16pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Ed Love
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 05 October 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 2712
Posted: 09 January 2018 at 3:22pm | IP Logged | 12 post reply

Too often, being able to hold a series is equated to being a viable or successful character. The Atom has always struggled to maintain a series. I don't think this means that there is something inherently wrong with the character. As conceptualized, the Atom or Man-Thing might be limiting for ongoing monthly stories. But, in short doses - one-shots, graphic novels, mini-series, team-up books there can be great stories generated and their presence enriches the overall concept of the shared history to which they belong. This is why I hate it when the companies look at a character whose series has failed as being a failed character and ripe for cannon fodder in the next event storyline.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 

<< Prev Page of 6 Next >>
  Post Reply | Post New Topic |

Forum Jump

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login

You are currently viewing the MOBILE version of the site.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL SITE