Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum MOBILE
Byrne Robotics | The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 6 Next >>
Topic: Unsalvageable heroes Post Reply | Post New Topic
Author
Message
Robbie Parry
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 17 June 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 12186
Posted: 09 January 2018 at 3:29pm | IP Logged | 1 post reply

 Ed Love wrote:
As conceptualized, the Atom or Man-Thing might be limiting for ongoing monthly stories.

I agree about Man-Thing, but I always thought miniature/shrinking characters had virtually unlimited tales to tell. 

Just my view, of course, but if I look around my apartment, communal garden, street, city, etc., I see many hazards and challenges for a tiny character, whether it be trapping them in a park pond to face fish or being stuck in a washing machine. 
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132336
Posted: 09 January 2018 at 4:09pm | IP Logged | 2 post reply

Julie Schwartz once said that after they'd done the first six issues of THE ATOM they realized all the stories were told.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Joe Hollon
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 08 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 13675
Posted: 09 January 2018 at 5:36pm | IP Logged | 3 post reply

Making Man-Thing furry, sentient and communicative
misses the point. Why didn't Stine create another
character?

*******

It was mind blowing to me. He must have not known
anything about the character and they just let him make
up whatever he wanted. I kept thinking there was going
to be some alternate reality explanation or
something....nope.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Valmor J. Pedretti
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 14 October 2011
Location: Brazil
Posts: 786
Posted: 09 January 2018 at 6:02pm | IP Logged | 4 post reply

It's weird to me that when I was younger Cyclops would always be one of my favorite characters and my friends would mock me for it.

Everybody liked the "cool" ones. Logan, Gambit or even Bishop (ok, I loved Cable!).

Then after I stopped collecting, a friend told me what had happened to Cyclops and how he was pretty much a villain those days.

So glad I stopped. Still love the character for what I remember him to be.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132336
Posted: 09 January 2018 at 6:06pm | IP Logged | 5 post reply

When I was young, Cyclops WAS the cool X-Man! See how much damage can be done by a character being poorly handled!
Back to Top profile | search
 
Eric Sofer
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 31 January 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 4789
Posted: 10 January 2018 at 8:33am | IP Logged | 6 post reply

Of the original X-Men, I've often considered which ones could or couldn't support a solo feature.

Two keep coming to mind that wouldn't make it without some substantial changes. I don't think that Angel or Professor X would be very good on their own.

That doesn't mean that a solo feature wouldn't work with a feature about a man whose powers are flying and some vague bird-ish traits, or a telepath... or even a man in a wheelchair.

But Charles Xavier just seems to work only in a team setting - which isn't a bad thing.

Similarly, I don't think the Angel is a good solo character. We all know characters whose only power is flight (winged or not) who can hold a feature... but I don't think that Warren Worthington III is one of those. There are very defined aspects to his character, but I'm not sure they all add up to a regular strip holding a lot of attention... unless, of course, his character was radically modified. Archangel might be a good book.

Also, I noticed something at 90s Marvel (and DC to a lesser degree) that I saw in late 60s DC comics. Characters of every name, type, power, smell, etc. got either their own ongoing or limited series. A metric crap-ton of X-Men, supporting characters, villains, etc.

I think about series like "The Creeper", "Hawk and the Dove", "Metamorpho", "Secret Six", etc. that DC put out for public consumption. This big difference is that a lot (not all, granted) got a tryout in one of DCs two "audition" books - Showcase or Brave and the Bold. Marvel had a lot of "feature" books that were like this, but I don't remember a lot of those post-speculator-boom Marvel titles that had try outs... it seemed like the House of Idea just flung #1s at the wall to see what would stick. So I guess the "unsalvagable" idea is a little different for a publisher...
Back to Top profile | search
 
Robbie Parry
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 17 June 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 12186
Posted: 10 January 2018 at 12:56pm | IP Logged | 7 post reply

Julie Schwartz once said that after they'd done the first six issues of THE ATOM they realized all the stories were told.

***

I would always defer to talented writers where possible. I just feel there are many opportunities for small characters. Almost every household item I can think of can be a death-trap for the likes of the Atom (toasters, vacuum cleaners). There's the pet cat, too. And a small communal garden like the one outside my apartment block is a "jungle" to the likes of the Atom. 

But I don't, of course, have experience of writing superhero characters so could be wrong. 
Back to Top profile | search
 
Andrew W. Farago
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 19 July 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 4069
Posted: 10 January 2018 at 1:17pm | IP Logged | 8 post reply

Similarly, I don't think the Angel is a good solo character.

Gambit's maybe had four years' worth of comics spread out over a few different series, and Deadpool and Cable were in the right place at the right time, but the founding X-Men and the All-New, All-Different X-Men (apart from Wolverine, obviously) haven't had much luck as solo characters.

That being said, I could see Angel as a solo character easily enough. He's a founding member of the X-Men, he's a billionaire playboy, his family has connections to the Hellfire Club...there's a lot to work with there. Build up a supporting cast at his corporate headquarters or have him start up a non-profit that helps new mutants and you don't have to make his wings "carry" the whole book.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
David Schmidt
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 11 July 2017
Location: France
Posts: 441
Posted: 11 January 2018 at 7:36am | IP Logged | 9 post reply

We should do the same thread with vilains.
Look what they did to Magneto!

I must say that Cyclops was my favorite hero too as soon as I read my first X-Men book.

Then he married his lost love clone...


Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132336
Posted: 11 January 2018 at 10:06am | IP Logged | 10 post reply

I must say that Cyclops was my favorite hero too as soon as I read my first X-Men book.

Then he married his lost love clone...

••

There are advantages to being an old geezer like me! My first X-Men comic was the first issue, back in the Sixties. I had years of the real, unmucked Cyclops (even if the stories themselves were sometimes less than stellar).

When he really started to slide off the tracks, I think, was when Shooter insisted the character be drawn big and beefy, so he would "look like a hero!" (Ironically, this was all turned around by the time X-FACTOR came along, and Shooter decided "Slim" Summers was the way to go!)

Back to Top profile | search
 
Eric Sofer
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 31 January 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 4789
Posted: 11 January 2018 at 10:13am | IP Logged | 11 post reply

Andrew F., I considered all the factors about Angel that you presented, and I just couldn't see stories that would be interesting enough to maintain a readership. Again... that's as he started (or, let's say, as of GSXM #1. Change him around, and sure - the whole (anti-)point of this post is about characters being interesting with modifications.

That being said... I'm not a comic writer. Messrs. Byrne, Simonson, Stern, Waid, etc. could likely make a very tasty pie out of Warren and his adventures.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132336
Posted: 11 January 2018 at 10:57am | IP Logged | 12 post reply

Reminder: No quotes from Wikipedia. No exceptions.
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 6 Next >>
  Post Reply | Post New Topic |

Forum Jump

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login

You are currently viewing the MOBILE version of the site.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL SITE