Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum MOBILE
Byrne Robotics | The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 4 Next >>
Topic: Jack Kirby indirectly helps create the Doom Patrol? Locked Post Reply | Post New Topic
Author
Message
Robert Cosgrove
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 1710
Posted: 25 March 2006 at 12:53pm | IP Logged | 1  

"(I do find it interesting, tho, that whenever the notion of something at
Marvel being stolen from DC, it is Stan who gets the blame -- usually by
the same people who will, in the next breath, claim that Kirby did it all
and Stan was just a coattail rider.)"

Without commenting on the general validity of your point, in this
instance, the commentator was Arnold Drake, a professional writer,
probably inclined to attribute copying of ideas to editorial direction--Stan
was the editor, though it's more likely that Martin Goodman would be the
one to say, "let's put out a book like that." As a writer himself, and one
who sees himself as an idea man, Drake would also be likely to assign the
story and conceptual work to Stan, whether that was in fact the case or
not.

I think it unlikely that either Goodman or Stan copied the Doom Patrol (or
tried to); for one thing, the motive for such imitation would have to be
sales, and I don't think the Doom Patrol was ever much of a seller.

I think Drake has been fairly candid in saying that Doom Patrol, if not a
Marvel imitation, was an attempt to bring to DC some of the qualities he
believed were selling Marvel's books.

In fact, I agree with what appears to be almost everyone else on this
thread that the books were very different. Drake's stories, at least at first,
were more densely plotted, and although Drake attemted to equal Stan's
flashy dialog, he always sounded a bit like your 40ish bachelor uncle in a
tie-dye shirt and bellbottoms trying to scoop those hippie chicks, man.
And characters like Beast Boy always struck me as having a bit more of
Kanigher's sensibility than Lee's. Perhaps the biggest difference in the
books was the art; Bruno Premiani's sensibility was about as far from
Kirby's as one gets; part of the charm of his art was the feeling that he
was being a good professional but would rather be back drawing
Tomahawk.

As for guys in wheelchairs leading a group of crimefighters--I honestly
don't remember. Was Ironside before or after X-Men/Doom Patrol?
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne

Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132359
Posted: 25 March 2006 at 2:27pm | IP Logged | 2  

Long after.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike Norris
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4274
Posted: 25 March 2006 at 3:10pm | IP Logged | 3  

As I recall the story goes that Goodman seeing the success of JLA asked Stan to create a team book. Stan came up with FF. Which was a very different kind of team book than JLA. I've no idea how factual the story is.  
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Matt Hawes
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 16432
Posted: 25 March 2006 at 3:17pm | IP Logged | 4  

Martin Goodman was well-known as a publisher that followed trends. Stan Lee was getting tired of the game when Goodman asked him to give Marvel (before it was actually "Marvel") a superhero team like the JL of A. On his wife's suggestion, Stan Lee decided to write a superhero comic the way he wanted to, that he thought he would enjoy reading, himself.

So, while Goodman was wanting to follow what he saw as a new trend (superhero comics coming back in vogue), Stan Lee took that assignment, and with Jack Kirby's help, created a unique concept of the superhero team. Hardly a rip-off of the JLA, though without the JLA, there would have been no Fantastic Four.

Then again, without Superman, there would have been no comic book superheroes.

Without Gladiator, Doc Savage, and Greek mythology there wouldn't have been Superman.

And so on...

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Chad Carter
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 16 June 2005
Posts: 9584
Posted: 25 March 2006 at 3:39pm | IP Logged | 5  

 

Even though the Challengers of the Unknown are SF adventurers in the FF mode, Doom Patrol and the FF are certainly more similar in every way, right down to the cosmic storylines and the external melodrama of the supporting cast. DP is DC's response to Marvel's success, and credit should probably be given for their quick reaction, considering DP came out in 1963, a year after FF debuted. I mean, DC must have been shaken to the core by what Marvel was doing, and how they were selling.

I think the X-Men comparison is Marvel fanboy fellatio. Isn't the original X-Men sort of the teenage version of FF, anyway? Utilitarian uniforms, staunch leader, a brute, a majestic flying guy/younger pratical joker, a useless cheesecake hottie, and their own Doc Doom? Strengthening the FF/DP, and the Challs for that matter, is the catalyst of an accident or accidents that transform them. They "die" and return to help the world. The X-Men are genetic outcasts who have to choose between moral codes. Not a problem of DP, the Challs, or the FF.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Hawes
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 16432
Posted: 25 March 2006 at 3:45pm | IP Logged | 6  

 Chad wrote:
...DP came out in 1963, a year after FF debuted...

"The Fantastic Four" was first published in 1961.

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Matt Hawes
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 16432
Posted: 25 March 2006 at 3:47pm | IP Logged | 7  

 Chad wrote:
... Isn't the original X-Men sort of the teenage version of FF, anyway?...

Pretty much. Even the cover of "X-Men" #1 notes that the book is in "The Fantastic Four style."

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Chad Carter
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 16 June 2005
Posts: 9584
Posted: 25 March 2006 at 4:48pm | IP Logged | 8  

Chad wrote:
...DP came out in 1963, a year after FF debuted...

"The Fantastic Four" was first published in 1961

 

The END of 1961. November to be exact.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Jason Czeskleba
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 30 April 2004
Posts: 4548
Posted: 25 March 2006 at 5:03pm | IP Logged | 9  

 arnold drake wrote:
Over the years I learned that an awful lot of writers and artists were working surreptitiously between the two offices [Marvel and DC].


Another thing... WHO was working for both Marvel and DC in 1963?  Certainly no writers, as all Marvel's writing pretty much was done by Stan and Larry Lieber.  Artists?  I can't think of any off the top of my head.  Mike Esposito, Gene Colan, Joe Orlando, Frank Giacoia and Gil Kane all came later.  George Klein maybe, if we buy into the theory he inked FF #1, but that was the only Marvel work he did until he left DC circa 1968, right?  Am I missing anyone?  Is there anyone who could be a viable candidate for the supposed "DC Mole" Drake is theorizing about?


Edited by Jason Czeskleba on 25 March 2006 at 5:04pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Rob Hewitt
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 11 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10182
Posted: 25 March 2006 at 5:06pm | IP Logged | 10  

Either way, something strikes me wrong about mocking someone at a public event, even if they are not there, in front of that person's peers.  Especially someone who seems as nice as Stan.

Plus, besides the superficial resemblance, the X-men went their own way, and became far more popular later than before. It isn't like Doom Patrol would have had that success, if not  for those blasted X-men.



Edited by Rob Hewitt on 25 March 2006 at 5:08pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Mike Sawin
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 11 December 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 766
Posted: 25 March 2006 at 5:15pm | IP Logged | 11  

It's a funny thing about "creating" stuff.  When I was a little kid, I read a lot of comics from Disney, and a few issues of Spider-Man.  Then I didn't read comics at all until I was 14 or so.

In the interim, I thought it would be so fun  to write for comics, and I "created" a team of heroes lead by a guy who had mind powers that hurt him physically everytime he used them.  His condition had deteriorated so much that he was confined to a wheelchair.

The team was called "The Agents of Change" and their leader was ... so help me:  The Chairman.  Basically, these guys fought crime and righted wrongs and even traveled through time. 

Of course, I was about 11 years old at the time.  I had never read an X-men book, or Doom Patrol either.  I had heard of the Fantastic Four.  But I did watch a lot of TV.  So what did I "create"?

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Matt Hawes
Byrne Robotics Member


Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 16432
Posted: 25 March 2006 at 5:32pm | IP Logged | 12  

 Chad wrote:
...The END of 1961. November to be exact....

Which, going by how the dates were put on comics at that time, meant the book was probably actually published in August of 1961. Usually, the cover dates were about four months ahead of the actual month the book was published.

Back to Top profile | search | www
 

<< Prev Page of 4 Next >>
  Post Reply | Post New Topic |

Forum Jump

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login

You are currently viewing the MOBILE version of the site.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL SITE